Sunday morning, while I was getting ready for church, I had
BYU Radio playing, and there was a short clip of a 2014 talk by Dieter F. Uchtdorf. I looked up the whole thing later, but here’s the transcript of the
clip I heard[i]:
It was less than a century ago that most astronomers assumed
that our Milky Way galaxy was the only galaxy in the universe.[ii]
They supposed all that lay beyond our galaxy was an immense nothingness, an
infinite void—empty, cold, and devoid of stars, light, and life.
 |
| screenshot from here |
As telescopes became more sophisticated—including telescopes
that could be launched into space—astronomers began to grasp a spectacular,
almost incomprehensible truth: the universe is mind-bogglingly bigger than
anyone had previously believed, and the heavens are filled with numberless
galaxies, unimaginably far away from us, each containing hundreds of billions
of stars.[iii]
In a very short period of time, our understanding of the
universe changed forever.
Today we can see some of these distant galaxies.[iv]
We know that they are there.
They have been there for a very long time.
But before mankind had instruments powerful enough to gather
celestial light and bring these galaxies into visibility, we did not believe
such a thing was possible.
The immensity of the universe didn’t suddenly change, but our
ability to see and understand this truth changed dramatically. And with that
greater light, mankind was introduced to glorious vistas we had never before
imagined.
He then introduces the main question of his talk:
It seems to be a trait of humanity to assume that we are
right even when we are wrong. And if that is the case, what hope is there for
any of us? Are we destined to drift aimlessly on an ocean of conflicting
information, stranded on a raft we have poorly pieced together from our own
biases?
Is it possible to find truth?
He then uses the earlier telescope
observation as a metaphor:
Scientists were struggling to understand the breadth of the
universe until instruments became sophisticated enough to gather in greater
light so they could understand a more complete truth.
The Apostle Paul taught a parallel principle regarding
spiritual knowledge. “The natural man receiveth not the things of the Spirit of
God,” he wrote to the Corinthians, “for they are foolishness unto him: neither
can he know them, because they are spiritually discerned" [1 Cor. 2:14]
In other words, if you want to recognize spiritual truth, you
have to use the right instruments. You can’t come to an understanding of
spiritual truth with instruments that are unable to detect it.
That got me thinking. Because I am able to perceive
spiritual things even when many in the world don’t—and further, claim that I
don’t.
I was thinking of another analogy. We had some books when
our children were young, called Magic Eye. There would
be a picture of apparently chaotic color. But if you stared at it long enough,
and relaxed your eyes a certain way, suddenly a three-dimensional image appeared.
It took some practice. For us,, in our family after we’d
figured out how to see the image on one page, we’d get quicker at seeing it on
the next.
Not everyone can manage to see the image. But it’s there,
whether a person perceives it or not. As an aside, there’s a half-decade-old lecture
by Jordan Peterson, called “Reality and the Sacred,” in which he discusses how
miraculous it is that we can perceive anything. Sight, for example, is so far
impossible for artificial intelligence; there’s too much complexity involved in
perceiving and understanding what we see.
Anyway, it’s hard to explain the process of seeing that
extra-dimensional picture exactly. You stare. You relax your eyes a bit, let
go. And it happens. That’s not very exact. And it’s not very helpful to those
who are struggling to see and cannot.
Those of us who have spiritual experiences, who can see the
metaphorical additional-dimension image, encourage the non-see-ers. There are
methods and steps that work for many of us:
· Suspend disbelief and be open to the possibility
of something beyond your five senses.
· Pray.
· Read spiritual texts that have record others’ spiritual
experiences and lead many to have spiritual experiences from reading them.
· Listen to the thoughts, ideas, impressions, or
feelings that come in answer to prayer, or as inspiration even in between
prayers.
· Act on these promptings.
· Record the promptings and results.
I’ve spent a fair amount of time listening to debates between
believers and atheists. The atheists are not persuasive to me, because they
dismiss my experience simply because they have not had those experiences. [Writing
on this theme is adding up. See here, here, here, and here, for example.]
I don’t know why they don’t get them and I do. Sometimes it
might be due to willful blindness on their part. Sometimes they’re decent
people just not looking at things in a way that allows them to see the extra
dimension that I see. But their not seeing something I’ve experiences doesn’t
convince me that I’m somehow mistaken. The evidence is in my favor.
 |
| image from Wikipedia |
Remember the children’s story Horton Hears a Who, by
Dr. Seuss? This elephant, with enormous ears and excellent hearing, and a kind
heart, hears the sounds of the people on a world that exists on a dust speck on
a clover. He knows they’re there, and so he protects them. But the non-hearers
all around him, while they could simply ignore him and let him do his thing,
are determined to stop him from believing he hears something. They threaten,
and connive, and work to destroy. Why? Does Horton’s belief (knowledge that
they can’t perceive) harm them?
In the end, Horton is able to convince the Whos down in
Whoville, the people on the speck, that they need to rally and make enough
noise to be heard. The final addition of one small child is enough to make them
heard by the ears of all the others in Horton’s world—similar to the
development of telescopes so we could see distant galaxies.
What if the Whos hadn’t been able to muster enough noise?
Would they have still been there? Yes, Horton knew it, whether the others knew
or not. (It’s fiction, I know, and therefore not actually real. I’m talking
within the realm of this story.)
The inability to perceive does not determine whether
something exists. This is particularly evident among believers in God and those
who don’t.
It is not limited to our day; this has happened many times
in history. But today, again, there is a vocal segment of nonbelievers that act
like those conniving bullies in the Horton story. If believers commit to live
better lives than they otherwise would—more honest, more committed to family,
more hardworking, getting rid of corruption and trying to remove evil
tendencies from their hearts—why should that garner the ire of nonbelievers?
Yet that’s what is going on when the attack companies like
Chick-fil-A, or Hobby Lobby, or small business owners like florist Baronelle Stutzman or baker Jack Phillips.
Then there’s this story about a Christian charter school in Maryland that was eliminated from the voucher program for holding biblical
views on sexuality.
There’s this story about Amazon discontinuing selling books by a Catholic psychologist, with a large body of work spreading over decades, because
of pressure from LGBT lobbyists.
This isn’t confined just to America. Canadians, a supposed
freedom of religion nation, just passed a law prohibiting public employees from
wearing religious symbols or clothing at work—no Christian crucifix, no Jewish yarmulke,
no Sikh turban.
Further in that same story, the Ontario Court of Appeals has
ruled that all doctors must give up their religious beliefs or get out of medicine:
Doctors must abort, euthanize, provide transgender
interventions or any other legal medical procedure—or find a doctor who will,
called an “effective referral.” In other words, Ontario forces doctors to take
human life or provide services he or she might consider mutilating, even if the
doctor considers it an egregious sin—either that, or be ghettoized into areas of
practice such as podiatry in which no such requests are likely to be made. And
if they don’t like that, as one judge put it, they can get out of medicine
altogether.
Elsewhere in the world, such as Syria, Christians are
persecuted to the brink of extinction, making everything I talk about here seem
minor. Still, I believe we need to address the relatively minor attacks while that is
what they are.
We mentioned Chick-fil-A above. They’ve been persecuted for years. Recently, during a gay pride parade in New York, a
Chick-fil-A restaurant was vandalized, and the vandals ironically accused
Chick-fil-A of being the haters.
There are sparks of goodness, still, because so many people
want to be good and are trying to figure that out for themselves. One man
tweeted this response to the Chick-fil-A attack: "I’m gay. I eat
Chick-Fil-A. I love Chick-Fil-A. They have different beliefs than I do. We can
agree to disagree on things. Doesn’t mean I hate them. Not seeing tolerance.
Not seeing love."
Another good story is that the near-century-old Bladensburg WWI Veterans Memorial, in the shape of a cross, is being allowed by the Supreme
Court to stand.
 |
| Bladensburg WWI Veterans Memorial image from here |
The odd question is why there would be so much hatred
against a religious symbol in a country that is founded and dedicated on Godly
principles—including, and maybe especially, the freedom to believe as we
choose.
Like those bullies in the Horton story, I’d like them to stop
with their screed long enough to explain why they are so desperate to stamp out
the possibility that other people perceive something they have not.
[ii] See
Marcia Bartusiak, The Day We Found the Universe (2009), xii.
[iii]
See Moses 1:33,35 in The Pearl of Great Price, and note that this was
revealed in June 1830, nearly a century before Edwin Hubble announced his
discovery of distant galaxies.
[iv] See,
for example, the Hubble Heritage Image Gallery at
heritage.stsci.edu/gallery/gallery.html.
