Three Books and Some Other Research Assignments

There are things related to COVID-19 that I’ve been trying to piece together, as a regular citizen without expertise, since the whole thing started. And I’ve been surprised at the things that get labeled conspiracy theories that later get borne out as true. That is happening.

My reading list has grown considerably this week. In one video Dr. Ryan Cole quoted Mark Twain, saying, “The man who doesn’t read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.” The information is out there to be had. And a thinking person can find it. Thinking leads to the right questions, which eventually lead to true answers.

cover image from Amazon

So mainly today I’m going to list the books to read and the videos to watch, with just a little about each one. And then you’re on your own.

·       The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy, Jr.

Kennedy was interviewed on Tucker Carlson Today, on November 15, 2021, an episode called “Coup de Vax.” He talks about a partnership between Fauci and Bill Gates, who came together with a plan to vaccinate essentially all of mankind. There’s a five-minute segment, mostly about Gates, that describes the type of corruption going on. And it’s a good illustration. Then we’ll go on to some of the dots that can be connected for Fauci’s personal culpability:

He began using his philanthropy to create a series of other quasi-governmental agencies: CEPI, GAVI, and a number of others. And then to gain control of the WHO.

He calls what he does philanthrocapitalism. It’s not about philanthropy; it’s about enriching the capitalist. What he does is, he buys—and he does this in a number of areas I show in the book. He does it with food. He did it with core curriculum. He buys large stakes in companies that could benefit from a change in governmental policies, a worldwide change in governmental policies. 

So he owns stakes, very very large stakes, in almost all the big pharmaceutical companies. Then he gives essentially about a billion dollars to WHO every year. But through Rotary International, through GAVI, through CEPI, and through the Gates Foundation—where the accumulation is even larger than the US, which is the second biggest. That gives him control over WHO’s policies. The analysts of WHO say there is nothing that goes through WHO that is unvetted first by the Gates Foundation.

And WHO controls the HIV money, and it funds the health agencies of most African countries. So they’re completely reliant on those annual checks from WHO. And what Gates and WHO do—or WHO on Gates’ behalf, because a lot of people at WHO do not want to do this—he is taking them away from their traditional occupations, which was economic development, hygiene, food supply, food production, and local democracy and local controls. So, WHO does very little of those things now, and they really focus—over 50% of their budget focuses on one of Gates’ vaccines only, the polio vaccine, which is a flawed vaccine. The polio vaccine, according to WHO’s own number, causes 70% of the polio on earth every year. So it’s not a successful vaccine.

But, what he does then is, he, through WHO—WHO will go in and say to an African country, “If you want your annual check from us, here’s what you’ve got to do. You have to show an 80% uptake of the DTP vaccine.” The DTP vaccine we don’t use in white countries, the United States. That’s the vaccine that was killing one out of every 300 kids. We got rid of it. Europeans got rid of it. But Gates gives 161 million African children that vaccine every year. And what he’ll say is, he’ll say—the WHO will say to this country, “You don’t get your HIV money; you don’t your systems money to run your health agency, unless you can show us you’ve vaccinated 80% of your kids”—that’s a hypothetical number, but it will be something like that—“with the DTP vaccine.” So those countries, then, are forced to buy that vaccine. And that vaccine, they have to purchase it ultimately from one of the companies that Gates is heavily invested in.

And Gates— He has a $33 billion corpus that he has put in the Gates Foundation, but it’s still his money. He’s still controlling it. And it’s now tax-deductible. It’s shielded from taxes. And he is now deploying it to change government policies in a way that it enriches companies that he’s elsewhere invested in.

And he does the same thing with food. He has switched many millions of Africans from subsistence that they’ve been doing successfully for, you know, 10,000 generations, to GMO crops, to heavily, you know, lots of chemical agriculture, carbon-based fertilizers—all have to be imported by his companies. He has huge investments in Monsanto, Cargill, and in the processed food companies that are then buying up those commodities cheap: Coca-Cola, McDonald’s, and Kraft Cheese. Those kinds of things.

So, the more you look at it, the more corrupt it gets.

But his deal with Tony Fauci—you know, which I go into in detail, what the result, the outcome for that bargain on the lives and health of millions and millions of Africans and South Asians has been absolutely catastrophic.

On a related note, there was this story today about Gates, doing what Kennedy described above, in the area of media:

·       “Bill Gates has given $319 million to bankroll select media outlets and change the public narrative—and the internet has receipts” by Sarah Taylor for The Blaze, November 18, 2021. 

 

cover image from Amazon

The next book on the list came up on Glenn Beck’s show November 17:

·         Faucian Bargain: The Most Powerful and Dangerous Bureaucrat in American History, by Steve Deace and Todd Erzen

Glenn Beck did another major explanation of corruption, called "Crimes and Cover-Up: Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie." It took three chalkboards. I was a full two hours. So far it’s still available on YouTube, and will continue to be available on BlazeTV (with subscription).

Many of the details are things I have come across before. He traces the history of SARS back to 2002. Anthony Fauci, before that, was attempting to come up with a vaccine for HIV, but he was doing it with an early version of mRNA, which didn’t qualify as a vaccine, by definition (the definition recently changed to accommodate the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines) and wasn’t effective. But he has been determined to come up with this new vaccine technology and have it be required for everyone in the world to take.

If you go through the history, you’ll see the connections between Dr. Baric of, I think, North Carolina University, and Dr. Shi Zhengli—the one called “the bat lady”—from China. Add in Peter Daszak, of EcoHealth, who managed funding from NIH to the Wuhan lab during the time government funding was disallowed for gain-of-function research. Dr. Fauci is involved in all of that. And recent emails show that he recognized the problems with the probable lab-leak revealing their secret funding.

There’s a careful timeline, with backup materials Beck says to go through yourself. So I downloaded those. It includes a three-page PDF list of sources. At the bottom it thanks DRASTIC research “for their tireless pursuit of the truth,” and then links to their in-depth work. I followed the link to here.

Concerning Fauci they have this segment:

Fauci approved a grant of $600,000 to the WIV [Wuhan Institute of Virology] for bat coronavirus research.  Fauci has sworn to Congress that this was not for “gain-of-function” research.  Fauci was relying on a very narrow definition of the term, in which the purpose of the research was to produce more potent viruses.

There is no doubt that the type of genetic engineering conducted at the WIV and other research institutions could have produced potent viruses, even if its purpose was simply to examine the effects of such manipulation. Fauci and others involved in the grant, such as Peter Daszak, have a clear interest in the virus not to have been produced as a result of this research.

It will take some time to go through all of this material. But if Beck’s summary is accurate—and I believe it is, because so much coincides with what I’m seeing elsewhere and have been collecting from multiple sources for well over a year—then we can see in real time the kind of worldwide corruption that we thought we left behind in the last century: the needless deaths of millions of people because of the selfish designs of tyrants who claim they care about “the collective” while disposing of anyone they don’t care about. And they don’t care about anyone who questions them, disagrees with them, or simply can’t grant them more power.

Glenn Beck presenting a chalkboard discussion "Crimes and Cover-Up:
Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie."
screenshot from here

When he reviews the three chalkboards, he points out that, on that first one, titled “The Vaccine Arms Race,” the main players, Dr. Ralph Baric, Dr. Shi Zhengli—“the bat lady” of China—and Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance are there from the beginning and throughout. But at the point he’s not ascribing ill intent. As he says,

These people actually believe that they should check all animals for all viruses. And they should find a vaccine for all of them, so we’ll always be prepared. OK, I think that’s insane. Very dangerous. But then again, I’ve been to the movie theater before.

But then there’s the big lie. There’s the connection to Anthony Fauci. He managed to pay for gain-of-function research—rather, he used our taxpayer dollars to pay for it, by funneling grant money through EcoHealth, during the years using government funding for it was not allowed. And then there’s this connection with Moderna, from 2015 on, and some very suspicious timing issues, and missing information.

On the second chalkboard, titled “The Pandemic Begins,” is where things start to look sleazy, with public-private partnerships popping up in places that benefit whoever Fauci decides they should benefit.

The real disturbing part is on the third chalkboard, title “Censorship & Cover-Up,” where he goes through a number of those Fauci emails that were recently released. There’s this part:

Two of the three men directing this propaganda campaign—and, make no mistake, as you will see, that’s exactly what it is. They were supposed to be part of Trump’s administration. Look at all of these facts. Is there any other way to describe it other than Fauci and the President’s science advisor colluding behind the President’s back, withholding information from him. Fauci has already been brought in front of Congress, and Rand Paul caught him in a bold-faced lie. Fauci will testify again. But it’s probably time to bring in the former president’s science advisor as well. Just a few, a couple questions, like, “Did you withhold information from the President? Did you ever lie to him?” That’s what will get it started.

Once you’ve watched Glenn Beck’s special, follow it up with Steve Deace’s panel discussion with Dr. Ryan Cole and Daniel Horowitz, titled “Crimes or Cover-Up? Answering the Forbidden Questions of COVID-19,” on The Blaze. 

 

cover image from Amazon

A third book not on my list is Dr. Scott Atlas’s book about COVID-19:

·         A Plague Upon Our House: My Fight at the Trump White House to Stop COVID from Destroying America, Dr. Scott W. Atlas, MD

I learned about it from his conversation with Tucker Carlson from November 17. Dr. Atlas was brought in to advise President Trump in late summer 2020. What he faced there was a “troika” of doctors: Birx, Fauci, and Redfield. All had worked together from back in the days of trying to develop an HIV vaccine. All are bureaucrats rather than doctors who see patients.

What surprised Dr. Atlas was how they never referred to any data during their meetings. He would bring in multiple studies for every meeting. They didn’t refute any of them. They simply ignored all data.

I’ve sensed that Dr. Redfield would like to have been more open to discussion, because he has been, somewhat, since his retirement. But that doesn’t excuse the utter lack of working with data during those task force meetings. The other two are probably beyond excuse. Dr. Atlas also couldn’t understand their lack of critical thinking.

So, after this sort of bombardment of info this week—all from independent sources, rather than what we now tend to call “legacy media”—maybe we’ll just list a few of the questions that come up when you look at what’s happening and do some critical thinking:

·       Why did we quarantine healthy people, instead of the most vulnerable, unlike all past disease outbreaks?

·       Why did “15 days to flatten the curve,” to avoid overwhelming the hospitals turn into 18 months (and counting) of “eradicate the disease” without any explanation for moving the goalposts?

·       Why is natural immunity ignored or dismissed, as if it doesn’t exist—when what doesn’t exist is any study showing it doesn’t exist?

·       Why is a vaccine being pushed for everyone, regardless of their risk factors, age, or natural immunity?

·       Why are vaccine injuries ignored?

·       Why was the definition of vaccine changed to remove the term “immunity”?

·       Why is the vaccine still being pushed (and attempted to be mandated) when it does no more than lessen virulence, and weakens in even that effectiveness within months?

·       Why have cheap, effective, safe drugs been banned?

·       Why have doctors been threatened for treating patients with treatments that work?

·       Why is damage to the economy and to other parts of public health ignored, with focus all on one single illness?

·       What has the censorship been intended to accomplish?

·       Why has the virus origin still not been found? Or that the probable origin location not acknowledged?

·       Who is to blame for the unnecessary deaths?

·       Why have so many people been willing to submit to edicts from elite doctors who do not provide their reasoning backed by data?

·       When will we stop the harmful lockdowns, shutdowns, and masks and get back to some sort of normal life?

·       When will the story of collusion and cover-up become common knowledge?

 

One last rather important question: When we are among those who have learned the truth, what do we do with it?

Three More Updates on the Neverending Election Saga

We’re going to cover three pieces of news, all related to that election that happened three months ago, and yet are newly relevant:

·         There was a cabal that successfully affected the election.

·         The proof of voter fraud, both of the traditional corrupt type and the newer corrupt digital type, is now available.

·         Courts are finally beginning to consider the evidence in voter fraud lawsuits, and a 2/3 majority are ruled in favor of Trump or Republicans.

 

The TIME Story

image from here

That news about the cabal isn’t from some conspiracy theory source; it is from TIME Magazine, documenting what happened, as told by those who did it, because they’re so proud of what they accomplished.

The TIME piece is called “The Secret History of the Shadow Campaign That Saved the 2020 Election,” by Molly Ball, with reporting by Leslie Dickstein, Mariah Espada and Simmone Shah.  It appeared online February 4^th, and the print version is set to appear February 15^th. As the piece describes it,

This is the inside story of the conspiracy to save the 2020 election, based on access to the group’s inner workings, never-before-seen documents and interviews with dozens of those involved from across the political spectrum.

By “save,” they mean prevent Trump from winning. And by “across the political spectrum,” they mean leftist/progressive Democrats along with some anarchists, with a few never-Trumpers added in. They  also say,

[T]he participants want the secret history of the 2020 election told, even though it sounds like a paranoid fever dream—a well-funded cabal of powerful people, ranging across industries and ideologies, working together behind the scenes to influence perceptions, change rules and laws, steer media coverage and control the flow of information.

It runs close to 7,000 words, so a review here can’t cover everything. But we can highlight what they’re so proud of. While I’ve summarized, I’ve taken the info pretty much directly from the story; I’ve highlighted my comments to differentiate them:

Overview of What They Did

·         There was an informal alliance between left-wing activists and business titans.

o   It stretched to Congress, Silicon Valley, and the nation’s statehouses.

·         They got states to change voting systems and laws [to remove rules meant to prevent fraudulent votes].

·         They helped secure hundreds of millions in public and private funding used to promote the voting changes, particularly mail-in voting.

·         They recruited armies of poll workers.

·         They got millions of people to vote by mail for the first time.

·         They successfully pressured social media companies to take a harder line against disinformation [i.e., opposing views] and used data-driven strategies to fight viral smears [i.e., opposing views, again].

Who Are They?

·         The architect of the cabal is Mike Podhorzer, senior adviser to the president of the AFL-CIO.

o   He brought together a group of liberal strategists in the early 2000s, which led to the creation of the Analyst Institute, a secretive firm that applies scientific methods to political campaigns.

o   He was also involved in the founding of the progressive data company Catalist.

·         Among the participants were the US Chamber of Commerce and the AFL-CIO; and Maurice Mitchell, national director of the Working Families Party. They also partnered with the Movement for Black Lives and the Working Families Party.

·         Other actors included The Fight Back Table, a coalition of “resistance” organizations.

o   Many leaders of the summer’s racial-justice protests were a key part of the liberal alliance.

o   They did scenario-planning around the potential for a contested election, gathering liberal activists at the local and national level into what they called the Democracy Defense Coalition.

·         On March 3^rd, Podhorzer drafted a three-page confidential memo titled “Threats to the 2020 Election.” [By threats to the election, or to democracy itself, they always mean a Trump win.] The memo laid out four categories of challenges:

o   Attacks on voters [i.e., voters who commit fraud].

o   Attacks on election administration [i.e., election officials who commit fraud].

o   Attacks on Trump’s political opponents.

o   “Efforts to reverse the results of the election.”

The Activities

·         Podhorzer began coordinating in October 2019. He began hosting weekly 2½-hour Zoom meetings in April 2020, talking about which ads were working, what messaging to use, and legal strategy, aiding communication among various leftist groups who normally didn’t communicate.

·         Taking advantage of COVID-19 as a crisis, in March the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights led 150 organizations to pressure Congress to steer COVID-19 relief to election administration, including postcards encouraging mail-in voting and other alternatives.

o   Private philanthropy joined in this COVID-19 response effort on elections. The Chan Zuckerberg Initiative chipped in $300 million.

o   Amber McReynolds, a former Denver election official who heads the nonpartisan National Vote at Home Institute, which advised 37 secretaries of state plus DC on such things as which vendors to use and where to locate drop boxes.

o   McReynolds also provided press materials used to convince the public on the importance of absentee ballots for shortening lines at polling places and preventing an election crisis [ meaning a Trump win].

·         The Voter Participation Center, instead of doing get-out-the-vote canvassing, focused on getting people to vote by mail and overcoming resistance, particularly by black communities that didn’t trust mail-in voting.

o    In August and September, it sent ballot applications to 15 million people in key states, 4.6 million of whom returned them.

·         Democrat lawyers fought pre-election lawsuits contesting law changes and rule changes. [Note: many lawsuits were dismissed for lack of standing, because damage had not yet been suffered by plaintiffs. However, later lawsuits were dismissed for laches—being filed too late for remedy, because problems should have been contested before the election.]

The Media Campaign

·         Laura Quinn, progressive operative who co-founded Catalist, piloted a nameless, secret project that tracked disinformation [i.e., opposing viewpoints] online and tried to figure out how to combat it.

o   Her solution was to pressure platforms to remove content or accounts that spread disinformation [i.e., opposing viewpoints] and by more aggressively policing it in the first place.

·         In November 2019, nine progressive leaders met with Mark Zuckerberg in his home, pressuring him to act against election-related “falsehoods.”

o   They weaponized current rules, expanding beyond actual crimes, such as inciting violence, to include the “dangers” of “false” ideas [i.e., opposing viewpoints, again].

o   Among those present was Vanita Gupta, president and CEO of the Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights, who also pressured Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey and others.

·         They had a media message campaign to convince voters:

o   That mail-in voting wasn’t susceptible to fraud.

o   That failure to finish the count on election night was to be expected.

o   The Voting Rights Lab and IntoAction created state-specific memes and graphics, spread by email, text, Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and TikTok, urging that every vote be counted [they mean every vote, not merely every legal vote]. Together, they were viewed more than 1 billion times.

o   By late October over 70% of Americans did not expect to get election results on election night.

Hair-Trigger Timed Riots

·         Activists prepared to reprise the summer’s demonstrations if Trump claimed to win the election.

o   This included 150 liberal groups: the Women’s March, the Sierra Club, Color of Change, Democrats.com, the Democratic Socialists of America, all joined the “Protect the Results” coalition.

o   The group’s now defunct website had a map listing 400 planned postelection demonstrations, to be activated via text message as early as November 4^th. [I highlighted this, because it shows their control over mob violence, which they intended to launch as needed. Meanwhile, they’re impeaching Trump for violence at the capitol that he did not cause.]

o   The summer’s racial-justice protests had sent a signal to business owners about the potential for economy-disrupting civil disorder, which led to the US Chamber of Commerce’s connection about a week before the election. [Notice the similarity to mafia protectionist racketeers: “It would be sad if something happened to your place; we’ll protect you—in exchange for a little something.”]

·         Podhorzer held an 11:00 PM Zoom call election night. He knew that polls had underestimated Trump’s support but promised that election-day voting would be overcome with mail-in votes.

o   Those on the call carefully prepared timing of planned protests.

o   Protect the Results announced that it would “not be activating the entire national mobilization network today, but remains ready to activate if necessary.”

o   Twitter continued to allow upset progressives to converse about how to stop the Trump “coup” [i.e., win of the count at that early point, or challenge of the irregularities]. They wanted violence.

o   Protect the Results altered protests into a weekend of celebration. “Counter their disinfo with our confidence & get ready to celebrate.”

Post-Election Day

·         Biden victory was declared by the media on November 7^th. After that came:

o   Winning the count.

o   Winning the certification.

o   Winning the Electoral College.

o   Winning the transition.

·         At 10 PM on Election Night, poll watchers arrived at the TCF Center in Detroit. Within 45 minutes progressive reinforcements arrived and were added to email chain for updated instructions.

o   Reinforcements included racial-justice activists from Detroit Will Breathe and Fems for Dems, working alongside local elected officials.

o   The media strategy messaged “the people’s right to decide, demanding their voices be heard and calling attention to the racial implications of disenfranchising Black Detroiters.”

·         When President Trump invited GOP state house leaders to the White House to talk, Protect Democracy’s local contacts researched pressure points to keep the lawmakers’ from being persuaded to act on fraud and irregularities.

o   Activists scanned flight schedules and flocked to the airports on both ends of Michigan lawmaker Shirkey’s journey to DC. Michigan was key to preventing other states from failing to certify questioned election results.

o   A street artist projected the state lawmakers’ images onto the outside of the Trump Hotel building on Pennsylvania Avenue, along with the words “THE WORLD IS WATCHING.”

o   Activists flooded the livestream of the canvassing board meeting, using the Twitter hashtag #AllEyesOnMI.

·         According to the TIME story, all progressive activists were told to scrupulously stand down on January 6^th. That meant any mayhem would be blamed on Trump supporters.

o   Business leaders denounced the Jan. 6^th attack and vilified the lawmakers who refused to certify Biden’s victory.

And Now

·         Podhorzer and his allies are still holding their Zoom strategy sessions, gauging voters’ views and developing new messages. Media and social media censorship continue.

·         Trump is in Florida, about to face his second impeachment trial, deplatformed from his Twitter and Facebook accounts.

The piece ends with this:

Democracy won in the end. The will of the people prevailed. But it’s crazy, in retrospect, that this is what it took to put on an election in the United States of America.

The “will of the people” does not mean what you think it means; it means the will of these people. And this is where we’d better define terms, in order to translate.

Democracy, at the time Tocqueville wrote Democracy in America, in the 1820s, wasn’t referring to a form of government, but to an egalitarianism—no elite ruling over the plebians. Anyone was equal to anyone else, and was just as entitled to rise to the top of his business or other sector of influence.

When these people refer to democracy today, it is clearly not that; they mean forcing the plebians (us deplorables) to submit to the ruling elites in government, media, academia, and business.

We know it isn’t even rule by the majority, which they claim they favor, because they want to ensure than only the elites’ choices are made, regardless of the voting will of the people. But they do put a fair amount of effort into persuading the plebians to go along with the elites’ choices—by preventing any opposing viewpoints from getting through.

What they claim to have done was save America from “an autocratically inclined President,” ironically failing to see the fascistic, totalitarian thought control and corruption they use to do it. Also ironically failing to notice that Trump’s actions throughout his four years were decidedly not autocratic or authoritarian. But it helps their narrative to paint him as Hitler, without letting little things like facts get in the way.

They claim their efforts were “dedicated not to winning the vote but to ensuring it would be free and fair, credible and uncorrupted.” But their admissions actually show that they were about “winning the vote” at all costs, particularly at the cost of free and fair elections—and at the cost of trust in the election process going forward. Ironically, they blame Trump for the lack of trust they could have solved simply by being trustworthy.

Joshua Philipp, on his January 7^th Crossroads episode, talked about this weird story: 

You have conspiracy here. And what do you call it when groups working together for more than a year in a conspiracy to change the outcome of an election, have been found to have coordinated on it—again, what do you call that? That’s a coup. That’s sedition. It’s what they’re accusing Trump of doing right now.

Something about a cabal, a secret conspiracy, a secret pact, and totalitarian censorship just doesn’t give off the “credible and uncorrupted” vibe they say it does. They are so out of touch that they think their collusion admission is noble.

Rather, it corroborates what Trump voters already knew, but non-cabal-participating Biden voters did not. Maybe you should tell them.

Here are a couple of good legal discussions of this TIME story:

·         “Time Magazine Releases Information About the Secret 2020 Election Shadow Campaign” Robert H. Gruler, Feb. 5, 2021. 

·         “The Times Elections Exposé is STUNNING” Viva Frei Vlawg, Feb. 6, 2021. 

 

Absolute Proof

Already I’m writing too long. I hate when that happens. One of the big news stories of the week was the excellent documentary put out by Mike Lindell, called Absolute Proof. It is a little under two hours.

title screenshot of Absolute Proof

It has been banned from YouTube and Vimeo, but not before getting 10 million views. And it continues to spread better than any previous collection of voter fraud evidence. You should be able to get it directly at MichaelJLindell.com.

The first portion goes over the more-or-less traditional election fraud, which is mainly what the cabal of the TIME story was involved in. There’s plenty of that. The following screenshots show the known fraudulent votes totals of those types in the six battleground states. Notice that each state far exceeds the margin of victory.

Arizona

Arizona voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Michigan

Michigan voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Nevada

Nevada voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Pennsylvania

Pennsylvania voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Wisconsin

Wisconsin voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Georgia

Georgia voter fraud and irregularities
screenshot from here

Those of us who have been paying attention have seen this evidence. It has also been catalogued by the Navarro Report, the Epoch Times documentary, and various other places we’ve referred to before. In normal times, this evidence would have prevented those six states from certifying until the questions could be cleared up and the actual outcome known, if it is possible to know. But these are not normal times.

Later in the documentary there is additional proof, of the more technical type of voter fraud. The other sources have mentioned this as well. People keep claiming it’s a conspiracy theory, and that, “you haven’t provided a shred of evidence.”

OK. Challenge taken. Lindell brings in the experts to lay it out.

They demonstrate that they have every instance of information exchange catalogued. They can show what IP address (what individual computer) made what contact to an election system, even down to the precinct level, what changes were made, whether they were attempted only or whether they succeeded in making the change.

And they have mapped each individual incidence of that interference on a global map. An outsized amount comes from China, but there are plenty of other locations involved.

map showing real time election interference from global locations
screenshot from here

They explain pretty carefully how they got the information, and how they know it is accurate. It would very likely hold up in a court of law.

Mike Lindell says that, now that the evidence is out—where he believes even the nine Supreme Court Justices have by now had a chance to view it, as well as the general public—the obvious need to clean up our elections is something we can unite behind. (I think he's overly optimistic, but I like that in a person.)

He doesn’t call for Biden’s ouster and Trump’s reinstatement. He is simply about putting the evidence out there, in the hands of the public.

Of course, then he’s censored. I suggest you view it directly from his site. And download it as a historical record.

 

The Court Cases

I was listening to a Jordan Peterson podcast of his conversation with Douglas Murray, recorded in January. During their far-ranging discussion, they talked about the US Presidential election, from their Canadian and British outside views. Jordan Peterson said that the biggest evidence that Trump was wrong about election fraud was the mass of cases thrown out of court. So many of them—all thrown out. That's what the media has told them.

If you’re paying attention here in America, you might know that those cases that were thrown out were on lack of standing or some other technicality—without looking at the evidence. That has been frustrating. But, failure to look at evidence does not equal lack of evidence. (See Lindell’s movie, referenced above.)

Justice tends to be slow and not always satisfying. But there has been some progress.

Citizen journalist John Droz, Jr., described as a physicist and environmental advocate from North Carolina, has been tracking the 2020 Presidential Election lawsuits, on his publicly available spreadsheet, updated as of February 6^th. 

According to an Epoch Times story, 

Of the 81 cases, 11 were withdrawn or consolidated and 23 were dismissed for lack of standing or on other grounds. Both the cohort of 11 and of 23 should not be considered “wins or losses for either side,” Droz says, because they “have nothing to do with the merits of the case.”

This leaves 47 cases. Of those 47, 22 have been finalized after the court heard arguments, considered evidence, and then issued a ruling.

Of those 22, Trump or Republicans won 15 and lost 7, according to the analysis.

This leaves 25 lawsuits that have yet to be finally disposed of.

Winning two out of three isn’t a bad start. I’m guessing that’s not what you’re hearing in the uncensored news.

Included in those 25 remaining lawsuits, the Supreme Court on Friday announced they had scheduled hearing several of the highest profile cases on February 19^th. These are Sidney Powell’s Michigan case, Linn Wood’s Georgia case, and Rep. Mike Kelly’s Pennsylvania case,  plus a couple of others. (Read this Epoch Times piece on them.) 

These specific cases all allege illegalities that affected the outcome, such as expanding mail-in ballots against state law, failure to provide adequate security measures around mail ballots, issues with machine vote tabulation, and denial of meaningful access to poll watchers. I don’t know whether the “machine vote tabulation” part will include the evidence shown in Mike Lindell’s video. Regardless, the Court is not likely to actually hear the cases before October 2021. That means not until the next session, which ends around June 2022.

 

Conclusions

So, what have we learned today? Things we knew, but now with more certainty:

·         Truth comes out.

·         Justice is not swift.

·         If the enemies of the Constitution are accusing our side of something, they’re doing it.