Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts
Showing posts with label activism. Show all posts

Monday, March 1, 2021

We Are All Enlisted

At our Tea Party meeting on Saturday, we were, as always, stirred up to action. The people who take a couple of hours out of a Saturday to learn about issues and find ways to take action are a particular breed to begin with. But we were also chastised for not doing enough. There was a Harris County election fraud issue we were presented with a couple of weeks ago (it's example 2 in this post), to pressure the Attorney General’s office to act on. Six hundred or more were given the information and the how-to for making that contact. Only 12 acted. (I was one, I believe, although mine so far was to contact only by email; I haven’t yet followed up by phone.) If we all see voter fraud as an important issue, then why don’t more of us take a simple action when it’s placed before us?

Texas State Capitol, 2018

 

What to Take Action On

One man said he accepted the chastisement, but then pointed out how, even at these meetings, there are so many things to take action on, we feel overwhelmed. Even in getting an answer to that comment, he got a list of six or seven important things to do. And he said, that’s his point. Life is full of these injustices and issues. How do we know where to spend our limited time?

The simple answer is, wherever you feel a passion, enough to learn the issue to speak intelligently on it, so you can share that with your circle of influence, and with your representatives.

I’ve been doing that for quite a number of years now. Decades. There’s not a lot of payoff. There are places I can see my work has been useful. But there are many more where I don’t feel I have the energy to do one more thing, and I hope others step up.

Here are some of the issues I’ve worked on over the years:

Defense of Marriage. I lobbied the state legislature in 2003, which worked, but was almost immediately overturned by the US Supreme Court. Continual work was eventually done in by the Supreme Court in Obergefell, and even the most effective advocates have gone silent. (See my Defense of Marriage collection.)

School Choice and Parental Rights. School failures consist of failure to teach what is needed and also teaching what is subversive to civilization. It is a basic God-given right for parents to see to the care and upbringing of their children. That’s why these two issues are closely related. We’re losing ground, because of teachers’ unions and international anti-family pressures. School choice is only a tiny effort to whittle away at the problem. I’m on a committee working on this issue for the current legislative session. We have yet to get a good school choice bill, despite promises from some of our best elected officials. This is in a state where the vast majority of parents would like school choice and probably 90% would say parents need to have the final say. I don’t know that public education is solvable. We need market solutions, with parents taking on the main decision-making for their own children. For a good overview of the parental rights problem, I recommend this video: “Overruled: Government Invasion of Your Parental Rights.” (H/T to Janice for passing this along to me.)

Abortion. There are always those who have been more activist than I am on this. I trusted them to do this important work while I work on other issues. But I have written on it, and lobbied for it, and worked for appropriate wording in the state platform. There is greater willingness from the public for abolishing abortion (with exception for life of the mother and, among some, in cases of rape). Meanwhile the minority opposition is more starkly contrasting—favoring abortion up until the moment of birth, or maybe beyond. We have passed a no dismemberment abortion bill, and a 20-week bill. Some states have passed heartbeat bills. But these all accept the assumption that we get to decide when it’s OK to kill a developing human baby. Even as we gain traction in the society on this issue, we make very little legal progress.

The Electric Grid. It became more than apparent a couple of weeks ago that we don’t do well without electricity. A freeze in Texas is going to be brief. But even from that 2-3 days without power, there were dozens of lives lost, and people are going to spend months dealing with the mess caused by frozen pipes. And everyone is casting blame. I’m more concerned about a longer and more extensive loss of power such as would come from a solar flare or an EMP strike. Loss of life, from starvation or disease mainly, could be beyond something we’ve seen since medieval plague times. We did finally this past week get a bill in the legislature that we think might address it. It’s relatively inexpensive and doable. But for reasons I don’t fully understand, there has been huge resistance (no pun intended) by the electric providers to get it done, even when the cost is not placed on them.

For the sake of brevity, but not for lack of importance, I’ll just add Religious Freedom and Healthcare Choice, without comment.

 

The Frustration

I do what I can on these issues, fitting my little bits of activism into and around a pretty full schedule of just living my life. I don’t know how to tell when an issue becomes so urgent that it requires setting everything else aside for a time until it is resolved—because some of these things don’t get resolved in a normal human lifetime.

Let’s add to this, we’re living in times when the odds are stacked against the side of freedom, prosperity, and civilization.

I was listening to the Viva & Barnes Sunday Night Livestream, and they were discussing particularly the Pennsylvania case dismissed by the Supreme Court last week. Robert Barnes was skeptical of Justice Amy Coney Barrett from the outset, and now is saying something like, “I told you so,” since her vote would have been sufficient for cert (only 4 of 9 are needed to take on a case). But the Court is saying there isn’t a time they will take up a case on this issue. Justice Thomas, in his dissent, called them out on this.

Robert Barnes offers them these seasonal excuses when they're determined not to take a case [around 28 minutes—the fuller discussion starting around 18 minutes]:

It’s not ripe in spring,

It’s no standing in summer,

It’s laches by fall,

And it’s moot by winter.

There’s a rule that should apply to whether a case can be considered moot. If it’s capable of repetition, —in order to set down rules for future similar situations—and if it’s likely to evade Supreme Court review—because it will be beyond remedy by the time it reaches the Supreme Court. If those two things are present, then the case is not moot. For that reason, election disputes should never be considered moot, and historically for decades have not been. Justice Thomas was right in his dissent. The Democrat appointees and three of the Republican appointees, including two appointed by President Trump, were simply wrong and have done harm to our Constitutional Republic.

So, we have an expectation of justice. We have laws. We have rules. We have precedent. But we do not get justice.

We elect officials to represent our views and defend the Constitution of the United States, yet so often they fail to do so.

We pressure them—taking time from our lives to force them to do their job—and only sluggishly, and only on occasion do they even listen to us.

Frustration builds up.

That is why, when you get a chance to hear from the former President who was elected four years ago because he would stand up to this frustration, you listen.

President Trump spoke at CPAC yesterday, which was more highly anticipated that anything Biden has said since inauguration. The crowd was ready and willing to support him in whatever he said. It wasn’t, certifiably, his best speech. It wasn’t polished. It probably wasn’t cleaned up and shortened enough. But he did say we would carry on. He was still in the fight (politically speaking).


President Trump giving speech at CPAC 2021, February 28, 2021
screenshot from here

He would have nothing to do with starting any new party; why do that and divide the Republican Party, which he owns from the grassroots up at this point? He told us we’ll work on election reform at the local and state levels. We’ll win things back in 2022. And he hinted that he might run again in 2024. “Maybe I’ll beat them a third time,” is how he put it, since this crowd knows he won the vote in November. He did suggest going to his website and contributing. There’s speculation this is part of a move to build up a new and separate—and uncensored—communications alternative, which will be necessary to reach people.

I don’t see how we can last up to and through another election cycle with the totalitarian dictators making the moves they’re making now. It’s not like past eras of even a decade ago. We can’t stand for this.

But how do we stand against it?

Supporting a champion for our side has been useful the past several years. It has helped clarify things. But I think we can see that no single champion is going to be enough. We have to keep soldiering on, in the face of apparent overwhelming odds. I think, instead of assuming continuing to do that is insanity, we must assume that, as we do all we can, God will fight our battles for us.

 

All We Can Do[i]

It’s that question of “all we can do” that occupies my thoughts. I don’t know how to tell when my contribution is enough. But I do believe that, if I trust God to guide me, I must act when prompted. And that will be enough. If all of us act when we’re prompted to act, we will collectively be the champions we need. We won’t each cover all the causes that are worthy. But enough of us will cover each one that we’ll represent the pressure out here from a freedom-loving people.

Become a Heritage Action Sentinel

If you need some guidance on where to get info, I suggest—well, several things. But let’s start with this one: become a Heritage Action Sentinel. When you’re in this national group, you’re tied in to what’s happening each week in Washington. There’s a weekly half-hour call. You can listen on your phone, or live on Facebook. Or the recording. Or get the call notes in your email inbox. When it’s time to act, they let you know and help you with what to say to your elected officials. They also encourage state and local work on similar issues. You can of course contribute money, but none is required to be a Sentinel. 

Become a Precinct Chair or Party Volunteer

Another way is to be a precinct chair or volunteer for the Republican Party. I’m not all about party loyalty; I’m about loyalty to our Constitution. Right now there’s none of that to be found in the Democrat Party (although you may find it among individual Democrats). Whatever part of it you could get in the Libertarian Party, you can get among Republicans, so that’s just a better place for your efforts, I think.

Right now, in my general vicinity (the area covering my church congregation, for example) there are five precinct chair vacancies. That means no one in the 2-3,000 people living in that precinct has stepped up to do the basics of running elections and attending a quarterly meeting to do party business. I’d say, if you become aware of this need in your area, and you’ve been looking for a way to take action, this assignment is for you. Look up your county party website and find out how to sign up. (Harris County info is here.) 

 

New precinct chairs being sworn in at our meeting January 25, 2021

If you have an active precinct chair, let them know you’re available to help. That might mean doing some block walking to identify like-minded people in your precinct, and helping get them connected to good information ahead of any future elections. Maybe it will be working on a committee, like outreach, or vetting candidates for local elections.

Join Clubs and Groups

There are clubs to help get people informed and activated. My local Cypress Texas Tea Party is one. We meet the fourth Saturday of the month at a barbecue place. I’ve been attending since 2010, very shortly after it began. Last month we had standing room only. This month was a more normal full room. There are groups for women, for college students, for Hispanics. Find a group of like-minded people meeting in your area. This will get you informed and connected—so the promptings to act will show up as you’re needed.

Become an Election Worker

You could step up to work elections. Presiding judge, alternate judge, and clerk are all paid positions. Poll watchers are unpaid but also essential. If you do the numbers, we need either a presiding or alternate judge plus one clerk and one poll watcher per polling place; in our county, that’s around 800 workers and 1200 poll watchers on election day. Plus there are the people who do the ballot counting—and the observing of the ballot counting. It takes a brigade to run a free and fair election.

Alan Vera, who has been our soldier in command in the election integrity fight, told us at a recent meeting, his sons have served deployments, a year at a time in Afghanistan and Iraq, to preserve our freedoms. Alan is a retired Army Ranger (and, really, they never retire). And I believe he said his father and grandfather had also served. So look at your life, he said, and see if maybe you can deploy for just a day.

 

These are not peace times. There is a war ongoing against our Constitution—and with it our freedoms of life, liberty, property—and our culture. We are all enlisted[ii].



[i] In the Book of Mormon, in 2 Nephi 25:23,  we read, “for we know that it is by grace that we are saved, after all we can do.”

[ii] This is the title of a hymn, text anonymous, music by William B. Bradbury

Monday, January 23, 2017

March and Meaning

The media told us there was a historic event across the country and around the world this past Saturday. Women came out, in extraordinary numbers, to march about….   I’m not sure.

As a strong woman friend, who didn’t attend, said on Facebook, “The whole point of a protest is to educate those who don't know anything about what it is about. I was left completely clueless.”
A confusing poster from the Women's March
found on a friend's Facebook,
original source unknown


I know a few women who participated. Young, educated, successful women. Women who have made their career choices, or are staying home with beautiful children while their husband pursues career goals that support the whole family. That’s anecdotal, I know. I just don’t happen to know any downtrodden, marginalized women who participated. But I assume in crowds that big, there were some.

But I’m confused about their message. Women around the world were protesting the election of a US President they don’t like? When the alternative was a catastrophically bad choice? That seems unlikely.

So, if we broaden out the purpose(s) for this solidarity march, maybe it’s about pushing a progressive (tyrannist), social justice (fascist) agenda that happens to be led by people who identify as female for now.

To anonymously quote one of my Facebook friends who attended in her city:

My earlier post only mentioned it was a reaction to a misogynistic president (which it definitely was), but it also was a pro-immigrant, pro-racial equality, pro-LGBTQIA rights, pro-environment, and pro-healthcare accessibility demonstration as well. Everyone marched for their own reasons, but it did expand beyond just feminism yesterday.
She linked to this Reuters article, which claims the activists were “outraged by Trump's campaign rhetoric and behavior they found to be especially misogynistic.” This is the very next day after the inauguration, and the event was in planning stages for some time, so it is not about either his rhetoric or behavior as president. Their timing, therefore, is a bit off; the campaign is over.

Another clever person made a comparison to NFL football following yesterday’s games:

I refuse to accept the results of the AFC & NFC Championship games. Tomorrow I’ll be protesting, picketing, looting, rioting, and forming support groups. Contact me privately for details.
#NotMySuperBowl     NFLMemes on Facebook
So, there’s the timing problem. Then, it is difficult to believe people are outraged about distasteful, disgusting things the now-president has said or done in the past when they show up costumed as their own genitalia. Signs they carry are some combination of vile, offensive, profane, or just stupid.

Video here, if you care to see; I’d rather not reproduce those images on my blog. But here's a photo of the leftover detritus.
The leftover detritus
photo credit Ben Ferguson


Then there’s the irony related to solidarity.

This Occupy-Wall-Street-sponsored, Planned-Parenthood-funded march attempted to exclude pro-life women.

A piece on Lifesite News, by Kelsey Kurtinitis, two days ahead of the march, starts out, “I am a woman, and yet the Women’s March on Washington does not represent me.” Later in the piece Kurtinitis explains,

According to their mission statement, they aim to “join in diversity” while sending “a bold message to our new government on their first day in office, and to the world that women’s rights are human rights.”…
All of these well-intentioned statements might have at least maintained consistency if they had not then immediately violated their very own mission statement.
Yesterday, the Women’s March organization made headlines by removing New Wave Feminists, a pro-life women’s group, as an official event sponsor. The Women’s March released a statement to defend their decision, apologizing for “the error” of having previously listed an “anti-choice” group as a partner. They also made it clear that they only wish to march on behalf of those who share the pro-abortion mindset.
So, women who “choose” life for children are not “woman” enough to qualify for the Women’s March. Hmm. Given pressure, organizers backtracked and decided to grudgingly allow participation from women who believe in giving birth to babies rather than killing them in the womb. For some reason that doesn’t win me over.

There has been some pushback. Some women explain why they didn’t join the march, while others respond with why they were wrong not to join. Some claim the definition of feminism has been hijacked, and others say the definition means anything and everything.

Conservative Review had a piece last September about the failure of modern feminism:

Like most progressive movements, modern feminism purports to laud equality, tolerance, and freedom of expression as its primary goals. The truth, however, is that feminism promotes two unappealing visions of equality, neither of which could be considered “tolerant.”
Some feminists have attempted to reach equality by disarming and devaluing men. For these women, equality demands that the status and intrinsic worth of men be lowered for the sake of female liberation, independence, and “leveling the playing field.” This is the “fight the patriarchy” and “the future is female” group.
An alternative and more radical form of modern feminism asserts that equality demands total transcendence of sexual and all other differences—complete uniformity in role, in pay, and, consequently, in perceived value. This view not only attacks men, but any person whose beliefs or values challenge the progressive feminist agenda. I call this camp the “feminist fascists.”
I have good friends who are willing to use the term feminism, and then define it themselves. They usually mean they want equal pay for equal work—usually unaware that women already have this, because they hear soundbites rather than look at data. [Pew Research points out that nearly all pay differences can be traced to women’s choices.] Sometimes they mean they want women to have the opportunity to pursue whatever work they want to do, as long as they are capable—again, unaware that women are more likely to graduate from high school, more likely to go to college [52% since 2010, according to UN statistics], and are more likely to be hired over a man to avoid accusations of sexism.

These sisters mean well. I don’t really have a quarrel with them. But I’ve been around long enough to know how the word has been used for many decades to mean anti-female. Women don’t gain more rights as women by denying their womanhood and acting like uncivilized men.

So I don’t ever describe myself as a feminist. And it never occurred to me to join in this meaningless march.


What did I do instead? I attended a funeral to celebrate the life of a beautiful, energetic, humanity-serving woman I had the privilege to know during the last few of her 78 years. Then I spoke at our local Tea Party meeting, outlining our legislative priorities during the session that just got underway here in Texas. (No one at the meeting talked about the march, or even mentioned the inauguration; we’re on to doing what we need to do next.) Then I went and played some music with friends. And then I went home to share a quiet evening watching a movie with Mr. Spherical Model, because sometimes being a woman living a very full life is  not only enough, it's exhausting.