 |
| cover image from here |
The book is 480 pages, thoroughly footnoted. I’m reading it in
Kindle, so my page numbers are based on 934 pages. This section I’m quoting
starts on p. 79 of Kindle:
Leading doctors and scientists, including some of the nation’s
most highly published and experienced physicians and front-line COVID specialists
like [Peter] McCullough, [Pierre] Kory, Ryan Cole, David Brownstein, and [Harvey]
Risch believe that Dr. Fauci’s suppression of early treatment and off-patent
remedies was responsible for up to 80 percent of the deaths attributed to
COVID. All five doctors independently told me the same thing. The relentless
malpractice of deliberately withholding early effective COVID treatments, of
forcing the use of toxic remdesivir, may have unnecessarily killed up to
500,000 Americans in hospitals.
Dr. Kory says so plainly: “Dr. Fauci’s suppression of early
treatments will go down in history as having caused the death of a half a
million Americans in the ICU.”
These things aren’t new to us here. I’ve been quoting many
of these doctors since early in the pandemic. But having all the facts laid out
in a book, with references, is still kind of stunning. Piecing it together
myself, it was hard to believe what I was seeing. Now it’s clear I wasn’t
imagining any of it.
Half a million is a lot of deaths. The vast majority were elderly—at
or beyond life expectancy, when something at some point was going to take them.
But it didn’t have to be a painful illness they could have been treated for but
weren’t, and which they were forced to go through alone. Even the very aged
with co-morbidities, when treated early, got better—usually without
hospitalization at all.
We were never “killing Grandma” by going without a mask or
vaccine; Fauci was killing Grandma by withholding treatments.
The book lays out why the doctors blame mainly Dr. Fauci,
and it’s convincing. For instance, the efforts of the front-line doctors who
developed treatment protocols got no financing or support from any government
anywhere in the world. What they got was hostility, censoring, and censuring—“much
of it orchestrated by Dr. Fauci and the US health agencies.”
Kennedy recounts the unusual absence of treatment protocols
from US universities:
The large universities that rely on hundreds of millions in annual
funding from NIH were also antagonistic. “We didn’t have a single academic
institution come up with a single protocol,” said Dr. McCullough. “They didn’t
even try. Harvard, Johns Hopkins, Duke, you name it. Not a single medical
center set up even a tent to try to treat patients and prevent hospitalization
and death. There wasn’t an ounce of original research coming out of America
available to fight COVID—other than vaccines.” All of these universities are
deeply dependent on billions of dollars that they receive from NIH. As we shall
see, these institutions live in terror of offending Anthony Fauci and that fear
paralyzed them in the midst of the pandemic.
“Dr. Fauci refused to promote any of these interventions,”
says Kory. “It’s not just that he made no effort to find effective off-the-shelf
cures—he aggressively suppressed them.”
Instead of supporting McCullough’s work, NIH and the other
federal regulators began actively censoring information on this range of effective
remedies. Doctors who attempted merely to open discussion about the potential
benefits of early treatments for COVID found themselves heavily and
inexplicably censored (pp. 78-79).
What kinds of things did Dr. Fauci suppress? There was this
FDA example:
FDA sent a letter of warning that N-acetyle-L-cysteine (NAC)
cannot be lawfully marketed as a dietary supplement, after decades of free
access on health food shelves, and suppressive IV vitamin C, which the Chinese
were using with extreme effectiveness.
Countries in the world that follow US recommendations had
the same types of problems as the US. But other countries, more off the radar,
used ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine, and other remedies in early treatment
plans, and had much better success. We actually had a first world-country
disadvantage.
Despite the censorship, some doctors treated—successfully. Most
experienced zero hospitalizations or deaths among a wide variety of patients
with age and co-morbidities. Early treatment made the difference.
Dr. McCullough is quoted as saying this of Fauci and those who
helped him obstruct:
“You need, in short, to do the opposite of everything they
did. It’s difficult to identify anything they did that was right” (p. 69).
The doctors’ estimates that 80% of deaths could have been
prevented with early treatment—rather than the standard protocol of sending the
patient home with directions to wait until they got sick enough for the
hospital—is probably low. Probably all but the very most fragile could have
been saved with early treatment.
Dr. Ryan Cole tells an example—one of his first, his own
brother. Dr. Cole had come across Dr. McCullough’s protocol early on, so he was
ready—
—when his overweight brother called Dr. Cole from a neighboring
state on his way to the ER with a positive PCR test, labored breathing, blood oxygen
at 86, and chest discomfort that he rated nine out of ten. “He has Type 1
diabetes,” explains Dr. Cole. Dr. Cole redirected his sibling to a local
pharmacy and called in an ivermectin prescription. Within six hours, my brother’s
chest pain was down to two out of ten due to the interferon effect of
ivermectin, and within 24 hours after taking ivermectin, his oxygen was 98, and
he then fully recovered” (p. 80).
Dr. Cole adds this:
“If you are under 70 years of age and have no severe
preexisting illness, you can hardly die [from SARS-CoV-2 infection]. So, there
is no fatality rate that can be reduced…. And for people who are elderly and
have preexisting illness,” he adds, “as we know from Dr. Peter McCullough and
his colleagues’ work, there are miraculously effective medicines to treat this
virus so that the fatality rates go down another 70 to 80 percent, which means
there is no ground for emergency use whatsoever. That’s a huge threat to the
vaccine cartel and to remdesivir” (p. 81)
Motivations for murder tend to be money and power. Fauci’s
incentive might have been money—big money for a vaccine everybody in the world
is supposed to take multiple times, or maybe for the new remdesivir, which was
as ineffective (or worse) as it was expensive. But he is already the most highly
paid bureaucrat in America, at a bit under half a million a year. Maybe that
wasn’t enough to satisfy him. But it ought to be enough to keep him from
resorting to mass murder. He was already 80 when the pandemic started. He could
have retired years ago and spent some of the money he’d accumulated on that more-than-comfortable
salary.
I’m guessing power is the greater motivator for Fauci. This
is an attitude he displays when he declares, “I am the science,” while offering
no data, just his say so, simultaneously threatening anyone who doesn’t fall in
line. It’s an ugly attribute. But it’s ugliest in someone who uses his power to
control the lives of hundreds of millions of people, and considers his personal
agenda more important than the lives of 500,000+ who could still be living
among us if he hadn’t prevented their treatment.
We’re supposed to avoid judgment (Matthew
7:1), or maybe better put as “judge righteous judgment” (John
7:24). I wonder exactly how God judges someone who purposely causes the unnecessary
deaths of so many people. Even when you consider mercy, it doesn’t look good
for an unrepentant mass murderer and self-imposed tyrant.
Fauci isn’t the only guilty person. He might be the ringleader.
Or maybe he does the bidding of someone more hidden in the shadows. But the
colleagues, the bureaucrats, the functionaries who followed him, blindly or
openly—those who knew they were causing deaths but that didn’t matter to them,
because they wanted funding, or their job, or whatever lure he used to bind
them to this evil, they are guilty as well.
Half a million deaths to your toll is massive. It’s not in
the same league as six million Jews plus 8 million others killed by the Nazis,
or 62 million by the USSR, 76 million by Mao’s regime in China, or even 2.2
million by the Khmer Rouge. But those were all by regime-wielding tyrants.
Fauci is what you would normally think of as a pencil-pushing doctor. Plus,
they all had years, maybe decades, to commit that many murders. He’s had only
an intense couple of years.
|
Regime |
Span of years |
Estimated deaths of own people (non-military
deaths) |
|
National Socialist German Workers’ Party
(NAZI) |
1939-1945 |
14.2 million:[i]
* 6 million Jews
* 5.7 million non-Jewish Soviets
* 2.5 million Polish, Serbs, others |
|
Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) |
1917-1987 |
62 million[ii] |
|
Chinese Communists under Mao |
1949-1987 |
76 million |
|
Khmer Rouge (Cambodian socialists under Pol
Pot, patterned on Mao) |
1975-1979 |
2.2 million (1/3 population)[iii] |
How he got the power to shut down an economy, silence
opposition, prevent treatment, and get people to willingly enforce his edicts
on one another is harder to explain.
The damage done by the vaccine is evil for another day, but
we ought to mention, despite the essential end of the pandemic through Omicron,
which reaches practically the whole population whether you’ve been vaccinated
or not, and maybe even if you’ve already recovered from COVID-19 in some other
form—despite all that, they’re recommending it for six-month-olds, who have essential
zero risk of death from the illness. The more we see how wrong they have been all along, the more they double down
on the lie.
There’s something Jordan Peterson says about the dilemma a
person had when faced with gestapo at the door while they were hiding Jews in
the attic; should you lie? Peterson points out that you wouldn’t be in that
dilemma if you and a lot of other people hadn’t waited until that moment to
wonder about telling the truth.
The point is, once you know vaccines do not prevent
infection—or spreading to others—you don’t give in to the pressure to take it.
And that helps prevent you from being pressured into risking your children’s
health with it, on down to your little baby.
The people attempting to invent a vaccine that would help in the pandemic may not have done wrong. But once they had to change the very definition of vaccine to allow this shot to be called one—even though it doesn’t prevent the illness and might not even lessen severity—they became complicit. Anyone who pressured others to take it, once its failings were already known and the VAERS data showed ever higher adverse reactions including death—when it’s still under emergency use authorization that shouldn’t have been granted, since there are effective treatments—is breaking the Nuremberg Code. This code was developed to prevent the world from ever again experimenting on human beings against their will.
 |
| Medical Case prosecutor details illegal experiments, during the Nuremberg proceedings. screenshot from video at the Holocaust Encyclopedia |
For some, the
vaccines might not have harmed, and maybe even helped prevent severe illness for those with comorbidities who would not get early treatment. But wherever there is
risk, there has to be choice.
We said, “Never again!” We need to add, “Not on my watch!”
Because the evil doesn’t lose its power until people stand up to it. It’s
already unbelievably bad when the evildoers are sanguine about killing off half
a million of our friends and family. But it will get worse unless we take away
evil’s power by standing strong now.
[i] United
States Holocaust Museum's online Holocaust Encyclopedia: https://www.ushmm.org/wlc/en/article.php?ModuleId=10008193.
[ii] Walter E. Williams, "Socialism's Death Count," August 7, 2012. He references
Rudolph J. Rummel's book and website Death by Government.
[iii] Socialism Sucks Facebook post April 2013.
No comments:
Post a Comment