Trying to Make Sense of What Makes No Sense

This past Friday the second person I knew died of COVID-19. She was someone I had only met a few times. But one of them was two days before her positive COVID test. Before the COVID shutdown I played in a jam session every Tuesday night, and then in a monthly group elsewhere on Saturdays. She was the newly elected president of the monthly group. We hadn’t been playing together in person for either group since the 2020 shutdown (with the exception pictured below). But with things looking very good in July, several of us tried meeting in a home on a couple of Tuesday nights (the church where we used to meet was no longer available). Some wore masks. Most were probably vaccinated. I’m at the younger end, so many are high risk just because of age. But not the friend who died. I'm pretty sure she was younger than I am.

Some of us got to play, outdoors, at this year's Katy Folklife Festival

Her illness was after just our second jam session, and we haven’t met since. No one else at the music jam either spread it or got it. I sat probably closest to her; I shared my music with her for a couple of pieces. I remain fine.

She was vaccinated.

She went into ICU on August 2^nd. In our monthly newsletter a week ago, she had given us an update. It sounded like she was improving, albeit way too slowly, so she was asking for a temporary reprieve from her president duties until she could get back on her feet. And she mentioned how they kept telling her, “Imagine how bad off you’d be if you hadn’t been vaccinated.” She was a bit overweight, but not seriously so; I’m unaware of any other possible co-morbidities.

I found myself angry about it. How could this happen to her—unless they didn’t give her known treatments?

 

This Makes No Sense

Most deaths—and most hospitalizations—are preventable with early treatment. And those early treatments ought to be available for the many vaccinated “breakthrough” cases too.

There’s something so strange about insisting on everyone being vaccinated—with a “vaccine” they had to redefine the word to include, a “vaccine” that doesn’t give immunity but simply creates an increase of some antibodies. Something so ineffective that you’re expected to still wear a mask afterward—and you’re still supposed to be deathly afraid of the unvaccinated you might walk past—despite the inability of people who are not sick to spread the illness to anyone, let alone to the vaccinated. Why?

And what about the unvaccinated who have natural immunity? Latest studies put their immunity as 27 times  more powerful than the vaccinated (this number keeps going up; in August it was thought to be 6 times more). Yet you’re supposed to be afraid of these naturally immune? And insist that they get a vaccine for the safety of the greater society? That makes no sense.

So much about this pandemic doesn’t make any sense.

There has never been a vaccine before for people with natural immunity. You don’t give mumps vaccine to people who had mumps, or chicken pox vaccine to kids who had chicken pox. And you never gave small pox vaccines to people who survived small pox. The idea was to give them something close enough to small pox but less deadly, cow pox for example, so their body’s immune system would fight off small pox. The annual flu shot may look like an exception, but the flu virus changes seasonally into a whole new flu virus. The vaccine is developed to combat the new virus as it appears in one hemisphere of the world, so the new vaccine will be ready for use when it appears in the other hemisphere.

This coronavirus vaccine is aimed at the original form of the virus, which has disappeared from the public, and the vaccine fails more consistently with each new variant. Meanwhile people who have had the disease and therefore have natural immunity are being forced to get the vaccine—to qualify for employment, travel, and other rights of society. That makes no sense.

We have never before required vaccinations for the safety of someone other than the person getting the vaccine. That’s true for adults or children. But why are we vaccinating children, who hardly ever got the virus in its original form and now only get the illness in variant form, usually very mild cases, rarely requiring hospitalization and almost never die from it? (And if given effective treatment, maybe they never die?) Chance of death or injury from the vaccine far outweighs chance of death or injury from the virus. So, are we making that risk choice for them to satisfy the fear of some adult?

Dr. Scott Atlas says, “To me it is unconscionable that a society uses its children as shields for adults. So we’re going to inject our children with an experimental drug that they don’t have a significant benefit from to shield ourselves.” 

Also, we’ve never before required a “vaccine” for something that is highly treatable—and often so mild that treatment isn’t even necessary.

 

More About Treatments

Monoclonal antibodies have gotten headlines lately. Florida instituted clinics all over the place to make them available.

So Biden comes out and declares that they must be rationed; states like Florida and Texas shouldn’t get all they want. Presumably because these states don’t have vaccination mandates and are therefore on the naughty list. But if you look at Florida, their vaccination rates for the elderly are very high, and their overall vaccination rates are above the national average. It’s the lack of mandate that offends the president.

I have a friend here in Texas recovering from COVID-19 now. She printed out Dr. Peter McCullough’s protocol to take with her to the urgent care center. They were impressed. They hadn’t heard of Dr. McCullough (whose protocol, published spring 2020, is the most downloaded medical article from the New England Journal of Medicine in history, so that’s odd), but they agreed with his recommendations and said they aligned with how they were treating. They put in a request for monoclonal antibodies for my friend, but she was turned down because her BMI wasn’t high enough. I think that means they’re saving them for people with co-morbidities such as obesity. She is at a healthy weight, in her 50s, eats a nutritious diet, and is otherwise healthy. She did have a couple of days in the hospital with some odd symptoms, but her oxygen levels remained high. And now we hope it’s just a matter of getting fully recovered.

The Houston Methodist hospital system website had this—so it may have been that way even before the Biden limits:

from the Houston Methodist website on monoclonal antibody treatment

The website also added that a common side effect is an allergic reaction, so that probably disqualifies me yet again.

Do you know where monoclonal antibodies come from? From people who had the disease and therefore have natural antibodies. The antibodies in their blood can be used. This treatment has been used for COVID-19 for more than a year now. President Trump was given this treatment when he had COVID-19 last fall. But the blood of people who have had the vaccine can’t be used. I’ve heard two things: they don’t have enough antibodies to be useful for this purpose; and/or the spike protein mRNA in the vaccine is a dangerous additive to an otherwise safe treatment—like using a blood transfusion from someone with AIDS or hepatitis: bad idea.

An interesting treatment for long-haul COVID-19 is giving us a possibly more thorough understanding of the disease.

Dr. Mobeen Syed talked with Dr. Tina Peers, a British doctor, who saw a pattern, made some mental connections, and started a clinic. It appears that treatment for MCAS (mast cell activation syndrome) works also for COVID-19. Doctors are surmising that those who get these long cases possibly already have MCAS, or maybe the disease triggers MCAS in certain patients.

MCAS as a condition has only been well recognized for maybe a decade and a half. Most doctors get about a minute of training in their years of medical school related to mast cells, and that relates to another, rare condition, and they’re told they’ll probably never see a case. So they don’t look for it. But MCAS is not that rare; some estimates are that about 17% of the population have it, with it being more prevalent in women.

Dr. Peers made the connection in an effort to help her very ill daughter. Her daughter’s issues were many, and diverse, and hard to treat and identify. But when Dr. Peers finally learned about MCAS, she had a sort of aha moment, and that wide array of symptoms tied together.

Dr. Peers’ specialty was in women’s reproductive health, but she found that a great many women would come in with these long histories of symptoms that hadn’t been successfully treated or well managed. After seeing enough of them, she recognizes them clinically, even without testing—which is possible, but not easily available in her country. Specimens have to be kept chilled from the time they’re taken, and on through the centrifuge process; a lab has to be very particular to make certain of that care, including during shipping to the testing lab.

I may ask my doctor about it at my next appointment. My 30-year-old diagnosis (among other things) of chronic fatigue, which means chronic undiagnosed illness, might actually get a meaningful label. Meanwhile, it looks like I’ve been doing a lot of right things all along—certain supplements that strengthen the immune system and lower inflammation, and a low-histamine diet. I looked up Dr. Peers online and found the low histamine diet she refers to. It will look daunting to someone who hasn’t done an elimination diet for food allergies before, but for me it’s pretty similar to my everyday diet.

As related to COVID-19, it appears that what is happening is a histamine overresponse. So you can treat with antihistamines, trying what works best among a list of H1 blockers and H2 blockers. I’m still hunting for a full accurate list, but montelukast (the generic of Singulair) was mentioned by name, and also levocerterizine (Xyzal, which is OTC), promethazine, cetirizine, and there are others.

When I wrote “Have a Plan” in August, I mentioned Dr. Shankara Chetty, in rural South Africa, who has a protocol for treating COVID-19 in a country where facilities, medicines, and treatments were limited. He found that patients often had a turning point around day 8, if they were going to get bad. Up until then, he was treating with ivermectin or hydroxychloroquine when he could get them. At this point he would add an antihistamine, and anti-inflammatories, possibly a steroid if that became necessary. He has treated over 5,000 COVID-19 patients and had zero patients need a hospital, and zero deaths. He observed symptoms and  was treating for what looked like a histamine overreaction, and it appears he was right.

Dr. Mobeen Syed has a protocol for long-haul COVID-19, and his also seems to coincide with what Dr. Peers was sharing with him. The MCAS connection is just a new way of describing what is happening, and it offers a broader approach to treatment.

For easy access:

·       Here is Dr. Mobeen Syed’s interview with Dr. Tina Peers. 

·       Here is the low-histamine diet and other info on MCAS treatment, which also works for long-haul COVID-19. 

·       Here is another Dr. Mobeen Syed interview, this one with Dr. Lawrence Afrin, who is the leading doctor on MCAS worldwide., who has also noticed the connection to treating lang-haul COVID-19. 

·       Here is Dr. Mobeen Syed’s protocol for long-haul COVID-19, in collaboration with Dr. Tina Peers and others, with the FLCCC. 

 

More to Think About

Joshua Philipp of Crossroads, for EpochTV, interviewed Gary Miliefsky, a founding member of the Department of Homeland Security and publisher of Cyber Defense Magazine. The far-ranging conversation covered several vaccine oddities.

Joshua Philipp (left) interviews Gary Miliefsky on Crossroads
screenshot from here

Miliefsky talked about the way the vaccines work, and the mRNA “platform” they are created on. He used the analogy of a football team. Your body’s immune system is one team, and the virus is the opponent. The vaccine retrains your team members to be specialists against that particular opponent—and no other. Soon all 11 players on the field are fighting off this same opponent. But as soon as you play another team, you’re in trouble.

Another analogy—this time from the cyber world. He suggested it was like anti-virus software that targets a particular bug, like the WannaCry virus that affected hospitals in England, for example. The vaccine is like virus software that targets this specific WannaCry virus—and none other. So your anti-viral software goes along targeting only this one thing, and reporting that all is well—while it’s letting in any other virus, trojan horse, or malware that comes along. And your computer gets sluggish, and slow, and stops working. But, hey, it’s fighting off that WannCry virus, so all is well, right?

He says you could get, say, a cold or flu after taking the virus, but your immune system is prepped to target coronavirus. There is less of your immune “team” left to fight off these other things. Your natural immune system is compromised; it’s weaker overall because of the vaccine.

And, I’ll add, the outcome is that it doesn’t even fight off the coronavirus very well. High cost/low return.

Miliefsky went through some info about Bill Gates. Miliefsky is a cyber security expert, so computers are his world. And he used to admire Bill Gates; it seemed like everyone did. And then he found out Bill Gates’s dad was a founder of Planned Parenthood and was a eugenicist. And Bill Gates, when he and wife Melinda started a foundation, it was called the Population Reduction Foundation; but when they saw that name didn’t go over well, they renamed it the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation. Miliefsky says,

So population reduction, he describes it all the time. “There’s just too many people on earth. We have to save the planet. And we’re doing a great job with vaccines, healthcare reproductive services, and contraceptives.” And that’s a quote-end quote from Bill Gates to millions of people. You can find it on YouTube.

So when they say there’s another pandemic coming, I’m just going to look for Event 202.

He was referring to whatever will be the next step after Event 201, (I mentioned it here) which he said was still viewable online. He’s right; it’s still there. This is the pandemic response scenario run-through done in New York in October 2019—immediately before the outbreak in Wuhan, China, of an eerily similar reality. (This is in addition to a similar pandemic response plan agreed to in the September 2019 GPMB conference a month or so earlier, which was part of The New Normal Plan.)

Anyway, having someone run this who is both highly inventive and believes in severely shrinking the population (killing off billions of people) is alarming.

And Gates is involved in the development of vaccine technology. That’s troubling. 

from Bill Gates Twitter feed, December 19, 2019

Another oddity of the vaccine is the inclusion of graphite, or graphene, some metallic-like substance. Miliefsky postulates that its purpose is to make a person trackable, or scannable.

screenshot from here

And he shows the evidence. About patentable gene sequencing, he points out that Bill Gates, or rather Microsoft Technology Licensing, LLC, owns patent # WO2020060606 for a cryptocurrency system using body activity data. (He shows a picture of the patent on the screen. I looked it up and found it here.) He describes the patent as saying, the more people take the vaccine, the more you can scan them, because of the graphite, graphene, or metallic substance in them. And this could be used in a way similar to bar scanning your groceries, and could be applied to cryptocurrency. They scan a person doing work, and then apply payment through cryptocurrency, based on the work he was scanned doing. He says,

This patent is associated with mRNA patents. So you’ve got one patent on creating cryptocurrency based on people’s work product tied to a vaccine. And then you’ve got patents on vaccines that are created using messenger RNA. And the Supreme Court ruled, if a vaccine is patented, will the DNA of a human be patentable? No. But will the synthetic DNA, the DNA modified, the new DNA as a result of modified mRNA be patentable? The answer is yes.

Miliefsky doesn’t mention this, but this does appear to be where people draw conspiracy conclusions: WO = world order / 2020 is the year of the pandemic / 060606 = 666. Coincidence? Again, I have no way of knowing for certain. I just keep getting more questions.

But I’m concerned that, whoever is making decisions, they aren’t all that interested in fighting this virus, keeping people alive, or getting them well. Whoever is making decisions wants more people to take more vaccines, regardless of safety or efficacy. And they’re willing to let hundreds of thousands of people die to get that to happen.

Something that strange leads us to look for a logical explanation. But I don’t have an explanation, other than there’s a lot of human-caused evil in the world today.