This is the second part of Misdirection from the Larger Story. Part I is here.
The impeachment hearings are purportedly about our president’s
interest in corruption by Joe Biden and his son in Ukraine from when Joe Biden
was the Vice President—interest that is supposedly off limits, regardless of
accuracy, because Joe Biden is a presidential candidate.
But that corruption story is only a small piece of the
larger Ukraine picture—which, in turn, is a small piece in a larger worldwide
picture, which we'll get to today.
Focus on that small piece is not only fruitless, because
there was no wrongdoing by President Trump, but also because it misdirects us
from the larger stories. So I don’t want to get too distracted, but since
former Ambassador Marie Yovanovitch testified on Friday, I want to add just a
bit of her part.
If we recall what we know about her, upon her appointment as
Ambassador to Ukraine by the Obama administration, she held a meeting with the
new prosecutor general, Lutsenko. Despite her denial that she “handed him a
list,” multiple sources verify that she listed for Lutsenko those entities his
investigations should not touch—including anything related to a George Soros
NGO or Burisma. He pulled out a piece of paper to write the list, and she said,
no, he misunderstood. And he answered that, yes, he understood very clearly. It
was how Ukraine, in all its corruption, had always worked, but now he could see
that the US worked this way as well.
That’s the former ambassador Yovanovich, who testified for
five hours on Friday. She was removed from her ambassador post (but remains a
State Department employee) months earlier and had no knowledge of the July
phonecall at the center of the impeachment inquiry. When asked directly whether
she knew anything about the President making a bribe, she had to answer no. When
then asked whether she was aware of any illegal act by the President, she again
had to answer no.
She not only had no firsthand knowledge surrounding the question,
she knew nothing secondhand. But for five hours she was allowed to make the
case that the President was interfering with State Department ongoing programs.
That’s pertinent to what we want to talk about. Not her
opinions on these things, but that the State Department thinks its duty is to
disregard the President’s policies and to enact its own program—and he’s
interfering! How dare he! He must be stopped!
The bigger picture in Ukraine goes back some years, to when
the then-President of Ukraine decided to side with Russia rather than the
European Union. There has always been, and continues to be, a separation
between ethnic Russians and Ukrainians within Ukraine. This moment was a
catalyst for revolution. And such a moment was what the Obama administration’s State
Department was looking for.
It was their policy to support the revolutionaries. Any
revolutionaries. Glenn Beck lays it out in four steps:
·
Step One: US State Department identifies,
trains, and funds “Civil Society” groups to mobilize.
·
Step Two: When opportunity emerges US trained
activists go into action.
·
Step Three: The State Department, and their
proxies, actively support the opposition.
·
Step Four: Infiltrate the new government with
hand-picked “Civil Society” leaders.
So the revolution—at Step Two in the plan—was the ousting of
the previous president Victor Yanukovych. Assistant Secretary of State for Europe and
Eurasian Affairs, Victoria Nuland, traveled to Ukraine three separate times
during that uprising. Glenn Beck shows a photo of her from December 2013
handing out cookies to the revolutionary activists in the streets.
 |
| Glenn Beck lays out what he can prove about what he calls the Democrats' Hydra. screenshot from here |
In his Part III of the Ukrainian corruption series, called "The Democrats' Hydra," Glenn
Beck mentions a leaked phone conversation, which he has in his possession, in which Nuland was
discussing how to manipulate who would become the next
Ukrainian prime minister. And, surprise! Surprise! That man ended up getting
the job.
There’s more:
But even though they’d been publicly outed, manipulating the
affairs of a sovereign nation, they didn’t stop. They doubled down.
If you’ll recall, from November 2014, the Obama
administration and State Department colluded—probably the right word—to form,
connect with, and protect a George Soros-funded NGO inaccurately named the Anti-Corruption
Action Center. And Glenn Beck’s researchers found further coordination:
Newly released emails obtained by Freedom of Information Act
request, shows near weekly communication between Nuland and Soros. This [he’s
showing] is an email chain from June 1, 2016, and it shows Soros setting up
a call with Nuland for one of their scheduled updates.
Another email chain, between Nuland and George Soros’s Open
Society Foundation happens to include the whistleblower, Eric Ciaramella.
Interesting the many places he shows up.
If you look at the four steps, you can see that the plan was
to disrupt, foment chaos, and then overthrow an existing regime and put in a
replacement government with hand-picked leaders. Done and done.
What is the evidence? Glenn Beck holds up documentation—which
he has shared online to make sure it doesn’t disappear, written by George Soros
personally and signed by him. Glenn Beck explains:
He actually says “a self-appointed advocate of the new
Ukraine.” This is his comprehensive strategy for the new Ukraine. In this
paper, Soros identifies the institutions that need to be either set up or
targeted by his group and the US State Department.
The first one is the National Anti-Corruption Bureau, that
needed to be established. Well, they got this one done right away. Right away.
They got that done in the beginning. It’s also relevant to point out that this relationship
bore fruit for the Obama administration as they pressured the bureau to
investigate Manafort. They later hit a home run when they illegally released
information implicating Manafort in the Black Ledger. It doesn’t mean Manafort isn’t guilty of something; it just
means illegally released that information, which kicks the Russian
investigation into overdrive.
Now why did I say illegally release the
information? Because a Ukrainian court convicted the head of the
Anti-Corruption Bureau—you know, the first thing that Soros said they had to
do. They were convicted for doing it, and interfering in the US 2016 election.
It’s interesting that the establishment of the bureau was part of Soros’s plan,
and they were directly coordinating with the Obama administration. It is the
head of this organization that is caught on tape bragging about how he worked
to discredit Trump on behalf of Hillary Clinton. [In Episode I of this series, called "Ukraine Scandal Explained."]
By the way, convicted in a court of law for interfering in a
US election. But our media has absolutely no interest.
This looks like it’s about Ukraine. But it’s bigger than
that. George Soros has a long history of creating chaos, often economic
collapse, in order to take out a regime and start anew. He’s done that pattern.
Why was Obama, along with the Clinton-run State Department, and currently
the embedded Deep State plan not only supporting Soros’s plans, but taking them
on as their own?
Power.
Alec Ross, an appointee to the State Department as a senior
advisor on innovation to Secretary of State Hillary Clinton, spoke to embassy
insiders at the Ukrainian Embassy, revealing some truths they wouldn’t normally
say openly—at least not to the rest of us. He has three things on the screen
behind him showing "infrastructure, mass media, and communication," with the word "INTERNET" underneath. He says,
Ross: And the force and effect of all three of these
paradigm shifts taking place at once creates a moment of remarkably disruptive
change. And, for those of us that work in foreign policy, the change that I
would argue is actually most significant goes to this issue: power.
 |
| Alec Ross at the Ukrainian Embassy in 2011. screenshot from here |
People like George Soros have money enough, and experience
enough. What he has left to crave is power, which he relishes. There’s a clip Glenn
Beck shows from a piece he did on Fox, called “The Puppetmaster.” This is Soros
in his own words:
Soros: When you try to, say, improve society, you
affect different people and their different interests differently. And they’re
not actually commensurate. So you very often have all kinds of unintended
adverse consequences. So I had to experiment. And it was a learning process.
The first part was this subversive activity, disrupting an oppressive regime.
That was a lot of fun, and that’s what actually got me hooked on this whole
enterprise.
 |
| George Soros clip from "The Puppetmaster" on Fox News screenshot from here |
Collapsing entire countries is fun for him. Compare this to
a time, during the Arab Spring, when Gaddafi was beaten and dragged to death in the streets, and Hillary Clinton says, “We came. We saw. He died.” Followed by
raucous laughter. Oh what fun it is to wield power! She’s practically giddy.
Did the State Department have a hand in causing the Arab Spring?
We said things were bigger than Ukraine; Ukraine was just an
example story of the larger global picture.
Here’s what Alec Ross said about their efforts—in that
four-step plan we mentioned above:
Ross: Some of the things that I spoke about when I
came to the department—things like leaderless revolution or virtual
organizations—might have been really edgy or a little off-center, but after
Tunisia and Egypt, nobody is questioning the abstraction of leaderless
revolutions, and after Wikileaks, certainly everybody understands the power of
virtual, globally distributed organizations.
And which step was taking place when the Ambassador to Libya
was in Benghazi in 2012, probably arranging arm sales to Syria? Was it really an "spontaneous, indigenous, popular uprising," or was it yet another trained-by-us, timed-by-us fomented uprising for the purpose of power mongering?
Let me remind you of one more thing: power mongers use chaos
as an opportunity to gain power. I wrote this on the Spherical Model website in
the article “The Political World is Round”:
People tend to be
afraid of the chaos of anarchy. Lenin saw this. One way to gain totalitarian
power is to create chaos and then promise to solve the problems of chaos
(crime, poverty, lack of safety on all levels) by offering government
solutions, until the revolutionaries have managed to get themselves installed
as dictators. This was the purpose of Trotsky’s idea of perpetual revolution:
Place power in our hands, and we will see that you are fed and housed and
protected—that is, if the dictator was so minded once the power was achieved.
Everywhere that communism has been tried, it took hold because people gave in
to this desire for government to provide protection and food and shelter. It
works on a people who do not trust their own ability to provide, and it works
especially well when chaos reigns to make it difficult for people to provide
for themselves. Revolutionaries therefore cause anarchy so that they can
implement their own totalitarian tyranny.
Anywhere that you
see revolutionaries using terrorism, they are creating chaos for the purpose of
seeking their own power—always. Their claim of doing it for the people and
their rights is always a lie—even to themselves.
Here’s one more quote from Alec Ross, so that you see how
this relates to Yovanovitch’s testimony on Friday:
 |
| Alec Ross quote screenshot from here |
Ross: Instead of trying to create a new bureau, what
we wanted to do was build a long-term institutional capacity. I leave feeling
that the work has been fully institutionalized and that the programs will live
on.”
The proof is long, detailed, and complex. But the trail is
there. We’re seeing what was hidden, because that July 25th phonecall
set off alarms among the entrenched Deep State; they had to stop investigations,
because they would be discovered. And then, because of their explosive
reaction, we’re actually seeing what they planned to keep hidden.
That’s a good thing. But only if we Americans take action to
root out the corruption.
Let me use a phrase a few of you will recognize: secret
combinations. [See Ether 8:18-25.] These are what bring the downfall of any civilization that
does not root them out.
Our former president and secretary of state were in a secret
combination with George Soros. There are others with them: Alec Ross, Victoria
Nuland, Marie Yovanovitch, Eric Ciaramella, Adam Schiff, Nancy Pelosi—and many
names we don’t know. They are imbedded in our State Department, our CIA, our
National Security. They will not give up power easily, because power is what
they crave most. And once they get it, they wield it tyrannically.
How do we root them out? As a single citizen here, typing at
my computer, I don’t know. But I know it’s important for me to know what’s
going on, and let that inform my vote, and my voice as I speak with others.
If there are enough of us who do that, God will make up for our limitations and
help us save this, the greatest experiment in freedom, prosperity, and
civilization the world has ever known.
No comments:
Post a Comment