Back around the beginning of this century, Gordon B.
Hinckley, our beloved prophet at the time, wrote a book titled Standing for Something: 10 Neglected Virtues
That Will Heal Our Hearts and Homes. The “Standing for Something” part
refers to a saying: “If you don’t stand for something, you’ll fall for
anything.”
I own the book, but I got the image here |
The book is about our need to return from the secularization
of our culture. In the introduction he says,
People who carry in their hearts a strong conviction
concerning the living reality of the Almighty and their accountability to Him
for what they do with their lives are far less likely to become enmeshed in
problems that inevitably weaken society. The loss of this conviction, the
almost total secularizing of our public attitudes, has been largely responsible
for the terrible social illnesses now running rampant among us (p. xix).
I think there’s a connection between this loss of God and a
movement toward a whole long list of alternative “virtues” that don’t qualify
as ultimately good, because ultimate good is defined by God. In short, when
people stop relying on God, they fall for all kinds of substitutes.
People like to be able to think well of themselves. A traditional
way of measuring your own goodness has been through religion. And that has been
effective. Religious people tend to think about things bigger than themselves,
related to pleasing God and effecting good for the rest of the human family.
This leads to stronger intact families, celebrating life and protecting the
lives of others, honesty, respect of property ownership, service, sharing,
helping, kindness, and other things we typically think of as virtuous.
People who fail to believe in God still want to think well
of themselves, but they don’t have the same source of guidance. They may still
adhere to many of the behaviors in the above list. Or their secular religion
might come up with another whole list of “virtues.”
They might shun some of the traditional virtues—particularly
sexual purity. And then, in an effort to let those around them know that they
have reason to think well of themselves, they do outward behaviors to signal
their perceived virtue. They virtue signal. To themselves as much as to others.
And along with virtue-signaling, they might also shame
anyone who doesn’t join them in their “religious” behavior.
That’s where we
have problems. It’s hard to find common ground when one person is shaming
another—either direction. Sometimes these very people shove their beliefs down
the throats of everyone around them while shouting, “Stop shoving your beliefs
down our throats.” And they do this completely without self-awareness.
People might not be aware these days of some ancient history
patterns. We think we’ve grown beyond the pagan, or the superstitious. But some
of the virtues being signaled today are the same, with some wording differences
and technological updates, as ancient pagan practices.
We can categorize some of these anti-religion’s tenets.
Worship of
Environment and Animals above Human Life
I wrote this last year, after the US stepped away from the
Paris Accords:
Climatism (not climate-related science, but the thing you’re
not allowed to question) looks to me like a pagan religion. The sacrifices
being required of us in the essentially vain hope that such sacrifices will
appease the climate gods look eerily similar to throwing people into the
volcano. It might make people feel like they have some control over something
out of their power, but it doesn’t actually affect an eruption—and it’s really
bad for the ones who get thrown into the volcano.
Are there reasons to be concerned about clean atmosphere and
water? Of course. We’re better off with clean air and water. But the more
advanced technologically a country gets—much of that from fossil fuels—the better
air and water quality. In fact, we have made so much progress that way that
there was a sudden shift from worrying about carbon monoxide to worrying about
the very natural and positive carbon dioxide.
Should we be concerned because of climate models? Maybe, but
they’ve been so consistently wrong so far that changing our entire lifestyle
seems extreme.
And saving water is a good idea, especially if you’re in a
drought area, because getting enough potable water for a large population is a
challenge. But, the world is not running out of water. I saw a documentary in
the IMAX theater of a museum once that showed a very dry part of the US, and
talked about the worry of running out of water. I was puzzled, because they
didn’t say “here”; they said it as though the world is losing water.
But, if you were taught the water cycle in grade school,
then you know that water from the atmosphere comes down as rain, and makes its
way into groundwater or into streams and rivers that eventually flow into the
ocean. When something wet dries, that water goes into the atmosphere. And sun
shining on lakes and oceans causes water to evaporate into the atmosphere. That’s
how it gets there to come down as rain or snow. And the cycle goes on.
Water molecules are made up of two hydrogen atoms and an
oxygen atom. Those are elements. They don’t disappear. Even if you disconnect
the hydrogen and oxygen, you don’t lose them; they stay here as part of our
earth, and they can be reconnected. (“Sciencing” was used in the novel The Martian, about an astronaut trapped on Mars, explaining how
to “make” water.)
Example of virtue signaling found here |
Should we be concerned because of climate models? Maybe, but
they’ve been so consistently wrong so far that changing our entire lifestyle
seems extreme.
Another aspect of ancient pagan religions is to honor
animals above humans. No other species would sacrifice its entire species out
of guilt that its existence fails to always positively impact some other
species. Species are designed to perpetuate themselves. It isn’t virtuous to
feel guilty for being human; it’s unnatural and ungrateful.
So, if you’ve been virtue signaling in one of the following
ways, you might want to ask yourself how you know what you do is virtuous. And
then, if you can’t explain it so clearly, logically, and unemotionally to a
nonbeliever that you convert with persuasion, maybe you’d better stop the shaming
as well:
·
Feeling panicked about global warming.
·
Driving a Prius or other electric status vehicle.
·
Pushing for alternative energy sources—except not
nuclear.
·
Eating vegetarian or vegan, not just for your
health, but because you believe your species has no right to eat other species.
Sexual Depravity and
Human Sacrifice
Related to valuing other species above humans also shows up
as human sacrifice in pagan, savage societies. Certainly we ought to be beyond
that. And yet that is a pretty good description of abortion.
Some ancient societies do away with the old and infirm. That
is what euthanasia is.
Savage societies typically fail to honor monogamy. This
leads to a lot of social failures we’ve known about for a long time, as
described by Vico and Unwin. (I’ve written a fuller discussion here.)
A side issue related to failing on monogamy is the spread of
what have always been considered deviant behaviors: homosexuality and gender
confusion. Finding better ways to treat people with these issues has to be a
more humane approach. But tolerating and embracing deviancy isn’t enlightened;
it’s very old and very pagan.
So, if you’ve been approving of the following things in an
attempt to virtue signal, you might also want to ask yourself how you know what you
do is virtuous. And again, if you can’t explain your reasoning so clearly,
logically, and unemotionally to a nonbeliever that you convert with persuasion,
maybe you’d better stop the shaming as well:
·
Alternative sexual lifestyles
·
Promiscuity
·
Homosexuality
·
Same-sex “marriage”
·
Transgenderism
·
Sexual freedom (promiscuity) for minors
·
Abortion
o Favoring
government funding and approval
o Refusing
any limits to abortion
·
Divorce for any reason
·
Benefits to couples whether married or not
·
Pro-masculinity for women
·
Anti-masculinity for men
Ruler as God
Another tactic of ancient potentates—kings, emperors, pharaohs,
etc.—was to replace the people’s religion, setting themselves up as god
incarnate, or perhaps an idol that they create as the object of the ruler's new religion. Then the people had to be loyal to him or be prosecuted (and usually
executed) for heresy. The people were instructed to bow down to their
god/ruler, pay him whatever assessment he charged, and then he, their
god/ruler, would look on them favorably.
I don’t know if the ancient king who set up a fiery furnace
for Shadrach, Meshach, and Abednego offered amenities that some “subjects”
expect of their government today. Life was brutal, so maybe just less imposed
brutality was enough to buy their subjects’ worship. But today, in exchange for
“worship” of the government/ruler, people speak as though government is doing the
divvying out of good things so that the “subjects” can be absolved from needing
to give.
So it becomes something virtue-signalers do when they “take
care of the poor and less fortunate” by having government confiscate wealth
from some to give to others. And they feel charitable doing this—even though it
was coerced, and therefore not charitable giving by them or anyone else.
And anyone who even mentions that government interference
actually makes things worse (look at welfare recipients since the War on Poverty began in the 1960s) is
shamed as cold and hateful—even if that person is personally giving a tithe and
more in actual charity and the virtue-signaling shamer has given nothing.
As we say here at the Spherical Model pretty often,
If the government wants to implement something beyond the
proper role of government, not only will government fail to achieve the stated
goals; it will likely do exactly opposite of the stated goal.
So, if you’ve been approving of the following things in an
attempt to virtue signal—you’re getting the idea—ask yourself how you know what
you do is virtuous. And once again, if you can’t explain your reasoning so
clearly, logically, and unemotionally to a nonbeliever that you convert with persuasion,
maybe you’d better stop the shaming as well:
·
Socialism
·
Anti-capitalism
·
More government regulation
·
Infringing on First Amendment rights: religion,
speech, assembly,
·
Gun control
·
Welfare unrelated to work or ways to get off
welfare
·
Ignore or reimagine the Constitution
·
Public school monopoly of education
·
Socialized medicine
The list could go on. The point is that our disagreements go
deep—as deep as religious beliefs. If we are ever to have peace, we need to
learn to respect people with different beliefs, stop assigning them epithets—racist,
homophobic, transphobic, hateful, bigoted, science denier, etc.—simply for not
following a new, unpersuasive list of virtues.
And if we want more civilization and less savagery, we need
a religious people who recognize virtue in honoring God, life, family, truth,and property.
No comments:
Post a Comment