Here at the Spherical Model, we have an alternative to right
and left, which could help during these times when the terms right and left are
being used in absurdly inaccurate ways.
Fascism isn’t right;
it never was right by any traditional
uses of the term. Fascism is coercion
to follow the directives of the people in power. It is totalitarian—which, in
the Spherical Model is far south into statist tyranny.
The Political Sphere of the Spherical Model |
Nazism is fascist.
And specifically it means national socialism—coerced enforcement in which the
state decided what people can do with their lives and their money, and even
their thoughts. It is, by definition, far south into statist tyranny.
Neo-Nazism is a
fringe group of haters who think it’s a good idea to play like Hitler and
pretend they can coerce enforcement of statist tyranny—assuming, no doubt, that
the fringe will be the ones wielding the power. And this fringe today, like
Hitler of old Nazism, tends to be white supremacist. They actually believe the
greatest qualifier is not what they accomplish, what they think or invent, or
how they treat people—but something they have absolutely no control over: the
amount of melanin in their skin.
What is the Alt-Right,
then? It isn’t “right”; it is deep south into tyranny. It is essentially Neo-Nazism.
It has nothing to do with what could be construed as right or conservative. It
has nothing to do with believing “all men are created equal,” or that God has
endowed us with basic human rights including life, liberty, and property, which
are best protected by limited government as spelled out in the US Constitution.
The Alt-Right is white-supremacist—something conservatives in our country have never been and cannot be.
Ben Shapiro, in Monday’s podcast, spent a few minutes
defining Alt-Right for us (from 7:30-9:30 in the video):
What is the Alt-Right? The Alt-Right is marching in the
streets. And the Alt-Right is supposedly… There’s a lot of misperception.
People on the left are calling everyone on the right Alt-Right, and saying
everybody’s a Nazi. It’s absolute garbage, Ok. The Alt-Right is its own
movement. The Alt-Right is a group of white supremacists who believe,
essentially, that western civilization is an outgrowth of white race, and that
threats to white race are a threat to western civilization. That’s the basic
premise of the Alt-Right.
Ok, a lot of people think they’re Alt-Right now, because they
like memes, or because they believe in the god of Kek. Kek is the meme-ry that
you see on 4chan and Reddit. And a lot of people who think that if they post a
frog, that makes them a member of the Alt-Right. That’s not what the Alt-Right
is.
The Alt-Right has a basic root philosophy. What happened over
time is that the Alt-Right was mainstreamed by a group of people that decided
to broaden the definition to include people who liked frog memes. OK, they
decided to broaden the definition. And they used that broadened definition in
order to make the claim, basically, that they were a big movement that had a
lot of support.
And then you saw people like Donald Trump and Steve Bannon—yes,
the president of the United States; yes, his chief strategist—give legitimacy
to the Alt-Right and refuse to condemn them in the middle of the campaign,
which gave them added impetus. And now you see them marching openly in the
streets.
So, was Charlottesville Trump’s fault? No, of course
Charlottesville wasn’t Trump’s fault, any more than what happened in Dallas a
year ago was Barack Obama’s fault, when a guy who believes a lot of the slogans
of Black Lives Matter went out and shot a bunch of cops. You’re only
responsible for violence if you are rhetorically calling for violence. Trump
has never done that. What he is responsible for, in some degree, is
mainstreaming the Alt-Right, and not treating them as a cancer to be excised
from the conservative movement that they really are.
I had to look up that bit about Kek and meme-ry, because I’m
not a millennial. I read about it here, and it is summarized in this meme. It’s
not germane to the discussion from here on.
What happened last weekend in Charlottesville began with an Alt-Right
protest. The movement is so small that only a very few locals would have
participated; the thousand or so had to be brought together from all over the
country to make enough to get media attention. Their purported purpose was to
protest any movement toward removing Confederate war memorials.
Without media attention, this event—and, further, the
movement—would end “not with a bang, but a whimper.”[i]
Instead, the media has used this fringe movement to try to claim every
Republican, every Trump voter, is a raving, bigoted imbecile, in a misguided “leftist”
effort to unseat our duly elected president.
Trump fights back, but gracelessly. That is probably a good
summary of the man. Sometimes he says things that are true, and sometimes he
does things that are right for freedom. But he seldom says or does things gracefully. We knew that well before the election.
Just as we knew president Obama was a black socialist SJW
(social justice warrior) who would try to impose control over free people where
he could, and would have a knee-jerk reaction against police and non-blacks and
actual conservatives at every opportunity. The solution is to argue truthfully
and wait out the length of his administration.
There are people, however, who refuse to do that with Trump
in the White House. And they are easily stirred up.
Stirred up people went to Charlottesville to give
voice in opposition to the white-supremacist fringe. Some of this opposition were
well-meaning, but among them was a violent group calling themselves Antifa,
which is short for “anti-fascist.” Their beliefs are a disgusting soup of SJW fanaticism
and radical communism. Ironically, Antifa’s methodology tends toward violent
imposition of their particular beliefs.
What was the definition of fascist, again? Fascism is
coercion to follow the directives of the people in power. Antifa is fascist,
not anti-fascist. They’re labeling any ideas they oppose as fascist, but they
are using fascist methods to enforce their views.
Which is why the Spherical Model is so much clearer about
these things. The Alt-Right is southern hemisphere statist tyranny. Antifa is
southern hemisphere statist tyranny. They are not opposites; they are different
flavors of the same thing—a small-stage replay of Germany and Russia in WWII.
Back to Charlottesville.
Fascism and Socialism are similar stripes in the same zone of statist tyranny. |
So, you allow a white-supremacist rally, lawfully exercising
free speech, however distasteful. But you don’t also allow, in the same
proximity, a violent fascist group that disagrees with that speech. At the very
least, you keep these protest groups miles and miles apart, with a strong
police force defending the lines they shall not cross.
That didn’t happen on Saturday. Both sides got violent. It
looks like Antifa instigated the first violence. Then one lone wolf from among
the Alt-Right upped the violence, using a vehicle as a deadly weapon, killing
one woman and injuring several others.
Anyone, of any belief tribe, who uses violence to enforce
their beliefs must be punished to the full extent of the law. That should
happen for the killer, and also for any other violent demonstrators.
There is no civilization where hatred rules. The Alt-Right has
no chance of either building or maintaining a civilization based on “my
greatest contribution is my skin color.” Antifa has no chance of either
building or maintaining a civilization based on “you must believe what I
believe, or I’ll force you to.”
Both are ugly, savage, and tyrannical. Oscillating between
one or another stripe of southern statist tyranny just ensures more tyranny,
poverty, and savagery.
The way to freedom, prosperity, and civilization are known.
We need people to choose the behaviors that get us there.
One heartening thing I saw was a story about a black man,
Daryl Davis, who has spent decades befriending white supremacists. His question
is, “How can you hate me when you don’t know me?” So he gives them a chance to
know him, and they—on their own—give up their old beliefs.
I don’t know how he finds them. He’s a brave man. But I
think he’s right: the way to get people to stop hating one another is to give
them a chance to be treated like a friend by someone they have called an enemy.
It sounds like a suggestion made in the Sermon on the Mount.
Hey, these articles are great! I think you're an excellent writer. I'm curious if you're a fan of Thomas Sowell or Milton Friedmand, they're certainly my heroes and you seem to be saying a lot of things they would agree with.
ReplyDeleteI have my own blog (https://thewingedmessenger.wordpress.com/) where I've tried to start covering politics/economics.
I like your analogy of north and south. I was once arguing with someone that socialism was bad and free markets worked well and they frustratingly urged me not to become a fascist (as if my ideas are leading in that direction). I might say I'm far right in terms of wanting small government and individual freedom, but as you say, fascism is more closely associated with socialism than capitalism and really it's to do with tyranny.
I'm a big fan of both Thomas Sowell and Milton Friedan. Also Walter Williams. Economists have a lot to offer. I do think the spherical model is a better, more informed way to understand ideas than the right-left extremes. I'll be checking out your blog.
ReplyDelete