Words are my tools. And my playthings. A big part of my life.
I appreciate a good word, a good phrase, a good sentence. I try to write
powerful words, but mostly fall short. Still, sometimes I read some older
pieces and think, that was well written. Good for me—and the inspiration that
was with me at that moment of writing.
So, because of my interest in words, I’m interested in
freedom of speech, and I pay attention when words and ideas are oppressed or suppressed.
image from here |
A week or so ago a friend posted on Facebook a piece called,
“Why I’m Teaching My Kids to be ‘Politically Correct.’” My Facebook friend is a young mom,
non-religious and not very political (but probably leaning liberal and/or
libertarian). I know her to be a good person, trying to live a decent life and
contributing well to her family and society. Knowing that, I read this piece
trying to see what appealed to my friend, to learn from that.
There’s this paragraph near the beginning, that I can almost
agree with:
As a writer, I think constantly about how words are being
used, and from where I’m sitting, political correctness has gotten conflated in
recent years with common decency, kindness, and consideration. On one hand,
anyone who dares to acknowledge people who say they’ve been hurt, or who
suggests that demonizing an entire group of people is a bad idea, is
automatically derided for being “politically correct.” And on the other hand,
people will say any awful thing that floats into their mind, claiming that they
are “just being honest,” and then when challenged, they will cry about
political correctness. (For the record, speaking your mind isn’t a virtue if
what’s on your mind is bigoted, obnoxious, or insulting. It’s just rude.)
The problem is, indeed, that political correctness has been
conflated with “common decency, kindness, and consideration.” That’s what has
given political correctness power—because we decent, kind, considerate people
don’t want to be misunderstood or mislabeled as bigoted and hateful. But in
reality political correctness isn’t about politeness or consideration for
others; it has the purpose of shutting down voices that don’t align with the
viewpoint being enforced.
The author of the piece decides to keep the incorrectly
conflated definition of political correctness, and insists she will teach her
children to be politically correct—because words do have power to hurt, and we
should at least make an effort not to offend or be rude. Her complaint is that
so many people are sick and tired of political correctness being shoved down
their throats that they eschew any controls, even self-control, over what they say:
The war on political correctness has become a scapegoat for
people to regress to a less open and tolerant era, as evidenced by the amount
of blatant racism, sexism, prejudice, and hatred being spewed in the name of
not being PC. The idea that marginalized or historically oppressed groups
should be given any kind of consideration is met with eye-rolling and open
disdain. In the past year, I’ve been stunned to witness educated adults
behaving like petulant children, gleefully claiming they’re taking down “the
establishment” by throwing out the baby of human decency with the “politically
correct” bathwater.
I agree with her that spewing hate in a misguided rebellion
against political correctness is pretty ugly. And she’s probably right that there’s a
rebellion going on in a PC reaction. That probably explains
much of Donald Trump’s popularity. He does speak things that are not PC, and
people who have had enough of that oppression cheer.
However, people are mistaken if they think he does it for
the sake of free speech. If you watch how he reacts to people who speak out
against him, or disagree with him, you’ll see the very tactics the PC police
use: humiliation, coercion, and economic and social pressure. He’s not
anti-PC; he’s pro-Trump’s version of what is allowed to be
said. He’s into manipulating people by controlling their words as much as
anyone else shutting us down for the sin of digressing from PC script.
For someone like me, careful about words, and naturally
gentle and kind, yet "painfully honest" (yes, I've been called that), any version of political correctness is a danger; it mislabels
me without exploring who I am in my heart.
I’ve lived long enough to watch PC vocabulary change. In my childhood,
the N-word was never used; that would have been considered offensive well
before I was born. But at that time, in the place where I lived, which had
never allowed slavery and never had Jim Crow laws, the word for the race of
people descended from various tribes in Africa and identifiable by darker skin and other characteristics was Negro, which comes from the Latin for black. It was just a term, not intended to be derogatory.
Then the term colored
became more common (as used by the NAACP). Then we were told that was
derogatory and we should use the term Afro-American.
Then we were told the preferred term was black.
Every time we accommodated, the term was changed and we were accused of being
offensive.
Not that long ago we were told that black was derogatory and we should use the term African-American.
As a word person, that term doesn’t make sense; it applies
not to race but to place of origin. A Saturday Night Live skit once played on
this, because the very blond Charlize Theron is from South Africa, so she is literally African-American. There are major portions of Africa
today populated by Arab-type peoples, or Europeans who moved to Africa many
centuries ago. Meanwhile, there are people of the black race all over the world
who are not American, so you have to know enough about country of origin to
refer to their race in any way, even when country-of-origin isn’t salient
information. Imagine the awkwardness of talking about the racial aspects of
Tay-Saks disease, which affects African-Americans of a certain skin color, and
African-French of a certain skin color, and African-Britons of a certain skin
color, and Egyptians of a non-Arab lineage, and Angolans of a certain skin
color….
It appears to me that there are people seeking to feel
offended, and no matter how many times we go along with their requests for yet another politically correct name change, they will come up with something new so they can claim we are
offending them.
So, for my personal language style guide, I have settled on black—without meaning any offense. And
that seems to be returning as the preferred term, if you can trust such groups
as Black Lives Matter or the New Black Panthers.
Would it be nice if we didn’t have to refer to race at all?
Yes. But since members of tribes insist on asserting their tribal pride and
power, it comes up. And any idea can only be expressed if there are words to
use.
Meanwhile, PC continues to be a bludgeon used against people
with views differing from a particular “progressive” ideology.
I recently read a piece called “Thought Reform in America,” by Thomas
Lifson, comparing America’s political correctness with oppressive regimes of
the past:
Political correctness has attained a level of institutional
power today in the United States that it can justifiably be compared with the
totalitarian brainwashing efforts seen in Mao Tse-tung’s Great Proletarian
Cultural Revolution (also known as "fundamental transformation"). The
salient social mechanisms shared by the two efforts at thought reform are public
shame and self-criticism.
He offers this anecdote:
Decades ago, when China first opened up, I met a prominent
Chinese scientist finally able to travel to the USA, who had been denounced,
tortured, and imprisoned during the Cultural Revolution for his crimes of
having a PhD from an American university and being dedicated to scientific
truth instead of political doctrine. I
will never forget the broken man talking about he had been made to confess his
crimes in front of a howling mob.
I thought about this sort of pressure when Governor Mike
Pence was chosen as the running mate on the Republican presidential ticket. He’s
generally a decent person, and has served his state relatively well. But
remember when Indiana came under attack for passing a RFRA law to protect religious freedom in the
wake of the Supreme Court’s overreaching same-sex marriage ruling. The PC
police—in the form of media and loud voices combined with threats, claimed the
state should be shamed and shunned and boycotted.
This episode included a newsperson seeking out a Christian
family-owned pizza shop and asking them the hypothetical question of whether
they were willing to cater a same-sex wedding. The honest owners—who pretty
much never catered weddings anyway, as a pizza shop—answered no, and were shut
down by the PC enforcers.
In that atmosphere, revealing why religious people needed
the protective law, Governor Pence caved to the pressure, and basically
apologized for the state’s mistake.
Sometimes it helps to reveal absurdity using absurdity.
Blogger Matt Walsh did that this week, talking about the silly, over-the-top PC
position that gender doesn’t exist. The satirical piece is entitled “Dear
Transphobic Ultrasound Technician, How Dare You Assign A Gender To Our Baby!”
As he explains to the politically incorrect technician:
You’re obviously a simpleton, so let me break this down a
little further. You cannot tell anything about a person based on their physical
and biological makeup. Anatomy doesn’t matter. DNA doesn’t matter. Bone
structure doesn’t matter. The reproductive system doesn’t matter. Nothing
matters. You can’t tell what a person is just based on what that person is. You
can’t even tell if it’s a person just because it’s a person. You can’t tell
anything about anyone based on anything.
If we are to win out against the oppression of our ideas, we
need to do it clearly, and boldly. Without rancor. Being kind and polite in
general, so that the claim that we are uncivilized for disagreeing makes no
sense.
It is not particularly brave for me to express these things,
here, in safe obscurity, where so far I face little effort to shut me down. But at least I speak. So, with no
intention of hurting the feelings of various groups, here are a few things that
I believe are true but could be subject to the suppression called political
correctness:
·
The most common occurrence of racism in America
today is black racism against whites and other non-blacks.
·
The systemic reason for blacks suffering poverty,
crime, and other social negatives is the breakdown of the family—with 70%+
children born out of wedlock, and fathers missing from homes.
·
The Democrat party is and has always been about
limiting the rights and opportunities of blacks—but they’re willing to oppress
others as well.
·
Almost all the terrorists in today’s world are
radical Islamists. Islam has a problem: either they must find a way to oust
radicals from their religion so we can all identify them and thwart them—or
they must leave that religion as unrecoverable, so that we can identify and
thwart the terrorists. The very idea of imposing radical Islam on the world is incompatible
with civilization and will bring only tyranny, poverty, and savagery. We need a
way to identify and stop anyone trying to impose tyranny on us.
·
Marriage is between a man and a woman,
permanently covenanting to form a family in which children can be raised by
their father and mother. No other sexual relationship has the benefits to
society that marriage does. Pretending other relationships are equivalent to
marriage harms marriage and degrades the family, leading to the decay of
civilization into savagery.
·
Sex outside of marriage is always wrong—and harmful
both to the individuals and to civilization.
·
Abortion is a choice against life. It is
generally a selfish choice made to
get rid of the natural consequences of the choice
to have sex outside of a married partnership.
·
Socialism is a form of tyranny; it takes by
force from people who create wealth and redistribute their property to those
who have not created wealth. It discourages work and innovation and leads to
poverty. Best outcomes happen when a free market is combined with voluntary
charitable giving.
·
The American Constitution is a model for limited
government to protect our rights, and if followed by a self-governing people, it
leads to almost unimaginable freedom, prosperity, and civilization. It will lead
to these positive outcomes wherever in the world its concepts are adhered to.
The way to freedom, prosperity,and civilization are known. We
need the freedom to speak up and teach those ways.
No comments:
Post a Comment