I’ve been planning, since the end of the Supreme Court
session at the end of June, to look again at SCOTUS voting patterns. The first
such post is April 13, 2012. We were looking at data prior to the ruling on
Obamacare, to see if there was a clue about what to expect. What we found was
that, while there is a liberal bloc and a conservative bloc, the early
decisions of the 2011 session showed a fair amount of congeniality on the
Court. (A session starts in the fall and
ends in June of the following year. So those rulings in spring 2012 were part
of the 2011 session.)
The 2012 session, now complete, includes all the cases, not
just the early ones of the session. So building the data base is a fair amount
more work than last time (79 cases, compared to 14). So I set aside a day for
it, built the data base, saved it (multiple times while working, plus a final
time before closing the file for dinnertime)—and then, because of my technical
challenges, the file disappeared. No amount of searching so far has yielded
anything but the original few.
Such is life. Maybe I’ll be able to redo the work for Monday’s
post.
In the meantime, a little movie preview.
This fall the classic science fiction book Ender’s Game comes to the big screen. I’ve
been aware of this story for a long time. The novel, I think, was published in
1991, but it was a short story in a collection before that, where I first
encountered it. Orson Scott Card was a graduate student at the university I
attended more than a decade before this novel, but even then he was a name on
campus, because so few English majors go on to make it big. The story is
powerful. I don’t recommend it to young readers, but it can be good for more
mature teen readers. It’s clean, but there is some raw violence and a lot of
psychological struggle.
A couple of years ago I read three of the sequels: Speaker for the Dead, Children of the Mind, and Xenocide, and I’ve occasionally mentioned
them. Ideas come up in his writing related to civilization; some have become
among my favorite quotes. So Orson Scott Card comes up April 28, 2011; May 31,2011; June 6, 2011; October 14, 2011; and a year later October 15, 2012.
There have been rumors about an Ender’s Game movie almost since it came out, but the author wasn’t
willing to lose control to Hollywood. He’s a screenwriter himself as well. So
when I heard earlier this year that the movie was really going to happen, I was
hopeful it would do the story justice. I’m still a little apprehensive about it
(the trailer makes it look like Ender is aware of things he doesn’t know in the
book). But Harrison Ford plays the commander, so that’s a possible plus. And
then you add in Ben Kingsley and Viola Davis.
Card also authored a nonfiction book for fiction writers
called Characters and Viewpoint.
It was clearer and more useful than anything on the subject I came across in
college. I have a lot of respect for him as a writer.
I think he’s a writing teacher in North Carolina. I haven’t
been following closely for a while, but he used to do a regular column for the
local newspaper, and it often got picked up by The Mormon Times, an online news and opinion publication. I would
often see his articles linked, and several over the years have been worth
saving in a file.
His writing is only occasionally political. He’s a Democrat,
but I’m puzzled by that, because he feels strongly about the Constitution, and
I think he warned us, both times, against the disaster that would follow an
Obama election. Once in a while he has written about traditional marriage, as I
do. [My Defense of Marriage collection is here]. In 2009 Card joined the board of the National Organization for Marriage, an organization I appreciate. I get their
newsletters, and follow their efforts in the courts, as well as with local
organizations in many states.
The other day I came across a story about a boycott of the
movie—because of Card’s controversial view. Presumably that “controversial”
view is the majority opinion that marriage should continue to be defined as it
has for all of the millennia up until
now, by all civilizations until the decadent ones we are beginning to
experience. Because he has opinions in favor of family, and in favor of children
being raised by their own two parents in a committed real marriage, these people
who believe they know better than us all think he should be shut down and
silenced as a human being, because they deem his opinion unacceptable.
If the rest of us boycotted every movie in any way
associated with anyone who has differences of opinions with us on things
totally unrelated to their movies, we would simply never see movies. We
conservatives tend to value actual tolerance much more than the “we order you
to be tolerant” crowd, apparently.
Anyway, if you think there’s a chance the movie coming from
this excellent classic book might be worth seeing, maybe you should not pay
heed to SkipEndersGame.com (hyperlink purposely omitted). Check it out with
some friends and family (preview before sharing with children, please).
No comments:
Post a Comment