Concerning News

These are concerning stories I’m watching. Mostly just waiting to see what happens next. I’m not going to write a full piece here today about each of them, just some headings and links, with the occasional quote and comment, and maybe a final summary.

 

UN Pact for the Future

On Sunday the United Nations took just five minutes to vote to take over the world. This was the UN Pact for the Future. They called it a consensus, but at least seven nations were opposed, because it did not include amendments they wanted. These included Russia, Iran, North Korea, Belarus, Syria and Nicaragua. Argentina’s President Milei spoke against the pact and excoriated the UN (see below), but Argentina isn’t on the opposition list. The vote was silent; if a nation didn’t speak in opposition in a given moment, their “silence” was considered consent.

While this pact is similar to other UN documents—lofty goals without much accountability—there is an underlying intent with this one to move the UN from an international cooperative body to an international governing body. And it intends to use businesses to assert pressure for them.

·       “World leaders adopt pivotal UN Pact for the Future” UN News, September 22, 2024. 

·       The UN document 

from p 44 of the Pact for the Future

·       “Argentina's 'chainsaw' president tells the UN to shove its 'socialist' 'Pact for the Future'” Joseph Mackinnon, The Blaze, September 26, 2024.   Argentina’s President Milei spoke against the Pact at the UN. He described it as “an attempt to build a totalitarian system of conformity across the business sector.” He said that Argentina would have nothing to do with centralizing world government and taking away sovereignty and human rights. This phrase also caught my eye: the UN “has transformed into a multi-headed leviathan that seeks to decide not only what each nation-state should do but also how all the citizens of the world should live.” I highlighted the phrase, which refers to the Revelation 13 sea beast—the worldwide cabal, the powers of darkness spreading across the nations of the earth. I don’t think the UN contains all of that beast; but I do think that beast includes the UN as presently constituted.

Argentina's President Javier Milei speaks at
the UN General Assembly, image from here

·       “The Most Important Event That No One is Talking About!” The Happy Lady, September 27, 2024.  The Happy Lady podcast is Latter-day Saint interest, with a lot of connecting dots in things in the news; she sees “pay attention numbers” all over the place, and she definitely thinks the Second Coming is soon. Between her and Christian Fire Poppy (who looks at signs in the heavens, and uses Stellarium.com as an astronomy resource far better than I have figured out how to do on my own) and Allie Duzett (who looks at the energy of the planets, a sort of different way of approaching astrology), I see more than my share of odd connections being made—enough to feel like the crazy guy in A Beautiful Mind. Nevertheless, I often find them interesting. The Happy Lady had this in her description box for this video: “America was just given into bondage by our administration as the world system of the beast was officially put into place while world leaders cheered. We're headed into a month of Hebrew feasts, worldwide prophetic revelation, jubilees, judgments, prophecy fulfillment, darkness, while celebrating the Light of the World and preparing for our Savior's return.” So President Milei (above) wasn’t the only one calling the UN the beast from Revelation 13.

·       “The U.S. Must Oppose the U.N. Pact for the Future” Brett Schaefer, The Heritage Foundation, September 16, 2024.  This was ahead of the vote by several days. Unfortunately, the current US administration is gung-ho in favor of worldwide centralized governance.

 

War in Israel

War is escalating in Israel. Last week there was the innovative targeted attack via pagers (see below), and then walkie-talkies. This week Israel attacked headquarters of Hezbollah. Headquarters were hidden beneath neighborhoods in Lebanon. Israel gave warning to residents to evacuate—as they usually do. It appears a major Hezbollah leader was killed in the attack, Hassan Nasrallah. While I wouldn’t call this Armageddon just yet, escalation has continued steadily for nearly a year now, since the October 7, 2023, attack by Hamas, supported by Hezbollah, Iran, and other anti-Israel sources. In other words, Armageddon is more likely to result from this continuation than from an interim peace before some future war.

air strike in town of Habbouch in southern Lebanon,
AP image from here

·       “Israeli strikes kill 492 in Lebanon’s deadliest day of conflict since 2006” by Melanie Lidman, Bassem Mroue, and Bassam Hatoum, for AP, September 24, 2024. 

·       “Israel Did Not Intercept Hezbollah Pagers That Exploded—It Made Them” The Daily Wire, September 19, 2023. 

exploded pager, AFP via Getty Images, found here

·       “IDF announces name of military offensive against Hezbollah: Northern Arrows” The Times of Israel, September 23, 2024.  I don’t know whether we’ll figure out some symbolic meaning for this name; for now I’m just noting that there is a name.

·       “Israel-Hezbollah live updates: Israel says strike in Beirut targeted Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah” NBC News, September 27, 2024. 

·       “Israel Targets Leader Of Hezbollah In Strike On Terror Group’s HQ” Ryan Saavedra, The Daily Wire, September 27, 2024. 

 

 

Assassination Attempts on Donald Trump

Initial Findings Report p. 1

This week a J13 (i.e., July 13, 2024) Initial Findings Report came out, of the investigation into the Secret Service and other government security lapses. I believe this comes from the Senate investigation so far. There are two versions: short and long. There also continues to be more information about the September 15 assassination attempt:

·       Initial Findings Report (2 pages) 

·       Full report (133 pages)  

·       “Man charged in apparent Trump plot wrote 'This was an assassination attempt,' court filing shows” by Marlene Lenthang, Jesse Kirsch, and Maria Piñero, for NBC News, September 23, 2024. 

 

 

J6 and Other Plots

Two pieces of information came out this week. One is a record showing that President Trump made a direct order to the military to use National Guard or active duty military—whatever it would take to maintain safety when so many people would be at the capitol.

Trump post about this news,
image is screenshot from here

·       “Bombshell transcripts: Trump urged use of troops to protect Capitol on Jan. 6 , but was rebuffed” John Solomon, Just the News, September 23, 2024.  Since the prosecution of Donald Trump for inciting violence on J6 requires a guilty mind, the prosecutors have hidden this information, which shows Trump’s priority was safety at the capitol; he wanted no violence. It should mean the charges are dropped.

The other piece of information relates to the media-forgotten story about the pipe bomber at the DNC on J6. After four years, officials still have not identified the person who planted the bomb. The security footage they released was grainy—in a way that current technology is not—and would not provide enough clarity, they said. This week Revolver News released testimony from a whistleblower—an investigator from a different government organization—who saw the actual security footage, which was clear, included both camera angles, and might possibly have provided identifiers (markings on clothing, facial recognition). He saw this at the DNC, not provided by the FBI. It appears FBI officials do not want the person identified. I (and plenty of others—see Dan Bongino) speculate that this was a plot to make it look like the soon-to-be-sworn-in VP Kamala Harris had an assassination attempt against her, but when adequate rioting broke out at the capitol building, they decided to push that insurrection narrative instead. We still don’t have an explanation for why Harris was at the DNC that historic day, when she was about to be named the first woman VP (and first Asian VP, and first black VP). We know she was at the DNC; her security entourage/vehicles are there. But she now claims she was afraid for her life at the capitol, with other senators supposedly under attack.

·       "BREAKING: Government Source Confirms FBI Dirty Tricks with Key Jan 6 Pipe Bomb Footage as Cover-Up Unravels” Revolver, September 25, 2024. 

Original footage, in video included in this Revolver story

One more Trump lawfare-related bonus item. Robert Gouveia had a conversation with Joe Sweeney, a former CIA lawyer specializing in classified document protection in legal cases, about his book Dangerous Injustice: How Democrats Weaponized DOJ to Protect Biden and Persecute Trump.  He details the many things wrong with the case against President Trump and the raid at Mar-a-Lago.

·       “Ex-CIA Lawyer Reveals TRUTH about Trump Raid and MORE” Joe Sweeney is on with Robert Gouveia, September 27, 2024. 

 

P Diddy Arrest

I do not know much about this performer. I would not recognize any of his music and would have to have any photo of him labeled to recognize him. However, this looks a lot like the Jeffrey Epstein case, in which a very rich person is surrounded by elites, and rumors abound that he has video of them in compromising situations, for blackmail or control purposes. While I heard it brought up on a number of podcasts, a quick online search for stories is bare of the conspiracy angle.

·       “Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs arrest and indictment: A timeline of key events” AP, September 18, 2024.

·       “The Reason P. Diddy's Famous Friends Have Likely Remained Silent Following His Arrest, According To A PR Expert” Erick Swann, CinemaBlend, September 28, 2024. 

 

Hurricane Helene

Water on Guy Ford Road bridge in Sugar Grove, North Carolina,
image from Jonathan Drake/Reuters, from here

This storm hit landfall near Tampa, Florida, as a category 4 hurricane. As the storm moved north and inland, six states have declared emergencies: Florida, Alabama, Georgia, South Carolina, North Carolina, and Virginia. Warnings went out to 60 million people in 12 states. Many people remain without power, water, or cell service.

·       “September 26, 2024 news on Hurricane Helene” CNN Weather, September 26, 2024. Other stories from subsequent days also appear on this page. 

·       “‘It’s shocking’: Asheville devastated after historic floods from Helene” Angeli Gabriel, Fox Weather, September 28, 2024. This story showing damage from up to 30 inches of rain in North Carolina exemplifies the type of damage the storm has wrought over a large area. This story includes video. 

 

Conclusions

It was a big news week. And these stories may seem random. Maybe they are. But maybe we can look at them as signs of the times. The UN story and the various stories related to the Deep State in the US relate to the Revelation 13 sea beast, helped along by the other beast—the false speaker or propaganda beast. The P Diddy story may be part of that sea beast. Maybe not, but it definitely exemplifies evil.

Then there’s war in Israel, which might be a precursor to Armageddon. We’ll wait and see, and hope for mercy.

And the seas surge beyond their bounds, with catastrophes spreading across many states. Just a normal hurricane season? Maybe. Or maybe it’s an example of the bad stuff—the tribulations—of the last days. At some point, if I’m understanding scriptures accurately (a very iffy if), then other plagues or catastrophes will come that will be aimed mainly at the wicked, rather than anyone in the way. That means the ones we’re seeing now are a wake-up call: repent now; there’s not much time left. In scripture, blessing prophecies are always certain, but warning prophecies can be averted by repentance. And, at the very least, there is protection for the repentant.

The woman in the sky constellation, with asteroids, on the day of Hurricane Helene,
screenshot from here

There are interesting signs in the heavens. Christian Fire Poppy showed what was in the skies when the hurricane hit Florida.  As is typical, the signs in the heavens—often aptly named asteroids or comes or other heavenly bodies—show up around the constellation Virgo, or woman in the sky described in Revelation 12. We’re also about to see the coinciding of Rosh Hashanah, an annular eclipse, and probably more I’m not remembering in about a week. That also happens to be the weekend of the Worldwide General Conference of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints. I’ll definitely be watching to hear from our 100-year-old prophet and other wise leaders, in case they have something to tell us on how to navigate these crazy times we’re in.

So, it’s just another week of concerning news, typical of the very last days foretold in prophecy.

Rhetorically Speaking

Rhetoric is, in essence, the skillful use of language. I’ve taught rhetoric; it was called basic writing. I use rhetoric here. It is using language for clarity and possibly also for persuasion, sometimes for beauty. Usually rhetoric is considered written speech, although a pre-written speech that is then spoken aloud might also be called rhetoric. By definition, it does not normally mean just speech.

If you didn’t know the definition, you would think rhetoric is a hateful thing. It’s lies. It’s malinformation, or something. It can be dangerous, or hateful, or racist, or anything that some ideology might be—and if it isn’t your ideology, then it must be terribly bad.

Ironically, those who are doing the blame game, accusing others of using dangerous rhetoric, are using that type of “rhetoric” for those negative purposes. And it’s almost always spoken remarks, not necessarily prepared or pre-written, although tweets and memes are definitely part of the mix.

While we’re defining words, let’s look at the word stochastic. This is a word I only became familiar with in the past year or so. I looked up the meaning in my 40-year-old dictionary; it comes at a page turn, so I won’t show a photo:

Sto-chas-tic

1.      Of, pertaining to, or arising from chance; involving probability; random.

2.      Math. Designating a process having an infinite progression of jointly distributed random variables.

It wasn’t in use in the 1828 Webster’s Dictionary. Current online dictionaries define it essentially the same way as above. And Wikipedia lists various fields in which it is used—all with the meaning of randomness or many variables.

But it began to be used quite recently in the phrase “stochastic terrorism.” Random terrorism? Meaning random targets? Causing random terror, rather than planned? No, not really. It has meant, “Your rhetoric (spoken language) is causing people to be violent, to become domestic terrorists.” That’s quite a stretch for the usage of the word. It’s also quite a stretch to think that rhetoric (spoken language) causes violence.

And, even more ironically, it is used to accuse—not those saying the violent things, but those being accused by them.

Spoiler alert: I do not believe in stochastic terrorism. And I do not believe in blaming rhetoric (or spoken language) for someone’s evil acts.

Can language lead people to do evil? Certainly. But to blame someone for inciting such evil, or such violence, the language would have to be direct, such as: “Join our cause. If you believe as we do, take action. We are planning an attack at midnight this Thursday. Meet with us at the gas station on the corner at 9:00 PM that night to get your assignments and weaponry. You might be killed, but not before you take out plenty of others.”

I wouldn’t really call that rhetoric. I would call that incitement. The person doing the speaking, though, wouldn’t be criminally guilty for the speaking—but for the planning and carrying out (or facilitating others in the carrying out) of the violence. Someone speaking those words, on a soapbox in a park, but being ignored as a crank by every passerby would not be guilty for speaking the words. The incitement charge would have to be from connecting with other human beings and persuading them—as part of an evil cabal—to carry out evil acts.

The ones currently complaining about dangerous, hateful rhetoric—and sometimes calling those things stochastic terrorism—are doing what we call projection. They are doing the things they are accusing their enemies of. And this is in tandem with two (known) assassination attempts on Donald Trump, the main target of their hateful speech.

The assassin from September 15, Ryan Routh (who is still alive and in custody; more below), put out a tweet using the phrase “democracy is on the ballot.” Dan Bongino shared a supercut (video collection of short clips) done, I think, by Bulldog Media, on his program September 17. I used screenshots to make a collage or two.

This first one has the anti-Trump media using that same “democracy is on the ballot” phrase—so maybe you could assume the assassin got it from somewhere.

There were several more clips; I missed a couple that specifically used the phrase “stochastic terrorism,” not in response to the things being said by all these sources, but by Donald Trump—for things he didn’t actually say, such as “white supremacists are good people,” or threatening a “bloodbath” if he didn’t win the election, rather than what he actually said, which was a warning for the beleaguered auto industry if Biden (now Harris) were to continue the administration’s harmful policies. Anyway, here’s another set, in which the speakers call Trump a threat to democracy or some such accusation (ironically from people supporting a candidate who was placed on the ballot, rather than being voted on), and even go so far as to say he has to be eliminated:

Dan Bongino also showed a list. It looked much like one I first saw on a Peak Prosperity video after the September 15 assassination attempt. But I find there is no overlap. Eventually I found the source to be the Trump/Vance campaign website news. The list is long, so I used five screenshots. You might note that this is all “hateful rhetoric” coming at, not from, the MAGA side. The list coming from the MAGA side so far seems to be limited to the Charlottesville lie, the J6 lie, and the bloodbath lie. If there were a shocking amount of hateful statements coming from the MAGA side, wouldn't they list the actual ones, rather than those easily debunked lies?

J.D. Vance had this response (passed along by The Blaze):

from this article on The Blaze

Still, like I said, these spoken words, as vile as they are, as unacceptable in a civilized society as they are, do not cause violence. Additionally, as if we have to say it, speech itself is not violence. We have free speech, which includes allowing vile, ugly things to be said. We have many non-violent ways to respond to that kind of speech—preferably always including speaking more truth.

Along those lines, Guy Benson has had a good response to some of these rhetorical attacks, in an article, here. He included photos of a couple of tweets:

There are more such tweets—in the category of victim blaming:

This was also included in the Guy Benson article

composite image from this Newsweek article

Fortunately, we have a “news” organization skilled in the use of rhetoric—in the form of humor, satire, parody. Thank you, Babylon Bee, for possibly keeping us sane:

from The Babylon Bee

 

from The Babylon Bee

 

Since I do not believe rhetoric—as bad as these hateful words have been—caused either of the assassins to do what they’ve done, why did they do those things?

Hatred and evil are real. Also, we are fighting against powers of darkness. Fortunately, light always wins out over darkness.

OK. But that’s rather vague. I have suspicions of some specifics. I am gathering from others more skilled in such investigations. But we can, at this point, put forth some theories, mainly to show what should be investigated, to then provide the proof we think can and should be found.

I do not believe either of these assassins just woke up one day and decided on their own to assassinate President Trump. I think—and evidence is tending toward this belief—that someone, possibly Deep State actors, possibly within some government agency (or possibly an enemy government, although our own looks more likely) targeted these susceptible individuals and convinced them that their acts, while illegal, would be seen as heroic, because Trump in the presidency would definitely mean “the end of our democracy,” because he is “literally Hitler,” etc.

The “hateful rhetoric,” as listed above, would be part of the milieu, the background noise, that led to the belief that Trump was evil and ought to be stopped. But it had to be something more direct that incited these individuals to take the actions they did.

This article is from Just the News;
the original poll results are here

shared as a Facebook story,
source appears to be @mostly.peaceful.memes

 

The July 13 Assassin

Let’s start with the questions for the July 13 shooter, Crooks. There are many people thinking through the questions. I’ll be referring mainly to information from two. First, Dan Bongino, who spent 12 years as a Secret Service agent, assigned to protect presidents and other government officials, their families, or state visitors from other nations. He knows what should have happened, so he’s uniquely qualified to ask why protection didn’t happen.

The other main source is Chris Martenson of Peak Prosperity. His channel isn’t always about such things, but he has a particular method of asking questions, eliminating extraneous theories when the evidence shows a different direction, and drawing conclusions when there’s enough evidence to do so.

I’m taking from multiple videos of both of them and may not always be able to point you to exact ones. Robert Gouveia also provided a lot of good examination of the evidence during the first couple of weeks when we were getting information. And certainly there were others. The longer I take to write this up, the more information comes out. So I don't expect the facts as we know them now to remain static. So this is a current snapshot of what I think we know.

Crooks was seen and identified as a suspicious person hours ahead of the shooting, and multiple times by multiple officers. But no officer ever went and encountered him. He had a scope—totally inappropriate in a crowd of people—unless you’re a shooter. He was able to use a drone (although the USSS had declined to use any, or said they couldn’t for some reason that is clearly not true). Both of these things could have led to the suspicion that Crooks was planning an attack—on the crowd or on the principal protectee.

Somehow Crooks was able to smuggle in a rifle. Maybe he had hidden it earlier; we don’t know. But it was his father’s rifle; the dad says his son had borrowed it that morning to go to the shooting range, which was a normal activity. So Crooks couldn’t have hidden it days before, only hours, at best.

And he was able to climb up onto the roof, with the rifle, and stand up and run across the building to get into place (that run is on video). This should have been heard by any officers stationed inside the building. He is seen by multiple people who were attending outside the event—unable to get into the venue, because of crowd size, but were able to hear from outside nearby. These witnesses called the assassin to the attention of various officers, and made video of the shooter on the roof.

Somehow, the officers stationed inside the building where they would have seen that roof happened to leave their posts at the critical time; we still don’t know why. Communications about the suspicious person, early on, and the critical information that he was on the roof just ahead of the shooting didn’t get to the detail protecting Trump, who would have kept him off the stage until the danger was dealt with. That didn’t happen.

The closer rooftop sniper team was located in such a way that they couldn’t see the shooter on the roof, because of a tree blocking their view. The second sniper team took out the shooter. Both teams were placed in such a way that they overlapped coverage area, rather than spreading out to cover more area. We still don’t know who made that decision and why.

The Secret Service cleaned off the roof (crime scene, where the assassin was shot and killed) on day three, which they don’t do. Someone local gets hired to do that—after all evidence has been gathered. Photos of the crime scene—I see why they might not be made available to the public, but they should have been available to any investigators, including congressional investigators. It was cleaned up very quickly. And we’re told to trust them.

Then, just days later, without telling investigators, the body was released and cremated. No further examination can be done. No one else can verify the official report. No one can do any additional toxicology testing. We’re just supposed to trust the official story.

The shooter was of an age that makes it essentially impossible that he didn’t have an online profile; he would have had to decide at age 12-14 that he would never use social media. That seems unlikely. But he seems to have been scrubbed from the internet.

We’re told he (or his computer?) was connected to three offshore accounts, and that he used various foreign encrypted communication apps. There could be reasonable explanations. But the simplest explanation is that he was paid in offshore accounts for doing the deed (whether he survived to receive it or his parents would), and that the recruiter also scrubbed his online profile ahead of time to keep investigators from finding connections. There were other connections, however, such as a visit from someone with a Washington, DC, phone that showed up in his vicinity shortly before the incident and then returned to a government agency building directly afterward. Who made this visit? Someone must know. There could be a reasonable explanation; the refusal to tell us what that might be leads to more speculation.

image shown in a Robert Gouveia video from July 23, 2024

We didn't mention the finding of a bomb or bomb materials in the perpetrator's vehicle, put together in a way that would have required some skill and practice—not to mention questions about getting the materials to put such a thing together.

Chris Martenson was giving near daily updates in July, as more info kept coming out. But additional information has been slow in coming. There are still questions, although they evolve any time there’s added info. But some of these questions--and the speculations they lead to--ought to be unnecessary, because they should have been answered nearly immediately back in July.

This week Josh Hawley came out with the Senate investigations current report, and Chuck Grassley also put out a letter.  Both talk about the stonewalling and refusal to answer the essential questions. Chris Martenson took the opportunity to cover these and give an update on what we know and what we still don't know.

This first image is from Senator Hawley's report:

from Senator Josh Hawley's report, screenshot from here

Martenson then puts together one of his summary lists. This one takes two slides to cover what we know about the shooter, local law enforcement, Secret Service, and FBI:

Screenshot from here

Screenshot from here

Dan Bongino is also careful to say what additional questions should be asked, rather than making accusations. But it looks, at the very least, to be a LIHOP situation (let it happen on purpose). It could be worse—a plan carried out by government Deep State actors. We don’t know. And the officials’ refusal to answer questions and allow a full investigation makes on-purpose look more likely.

If this was just a series of mistakes and extremely bad luck, we would see changes to prevent this kind of thing from happening again. But that is not what we see.

 

The September 15 Assassin

On Sunday, September 15, at the golf course four miles from Mar-a-Lago, Trump made an unplanned trip to play golf. The Secret Service was a couple of holes ahead, looking for danger. It happened that an agent spotted a gun barrel protruding from a chain link fence, spotted the assassin, who was wearing a pink shirt, and shot at him. The would-be assassin fled in a car (the car had stolen plates, but I think I heard he had borrowed it from his daughter in North Carolina).

Ryan Routh, attempted assassin of Donald Trump on September 15,
image from here

If the perpetrator had worn a ghillie suit or something less noticeable, or if the gun hadn't been protruding through the fence, the assassin could have gotten off a shot at close range. 

A nearby citizen saw the person run out of the bushes and take off in the car, and followed to get a photo of the car and the license, which they called in to police. The police were quickly able to apprehend the man, Ryan Routh, who is now in custody.

So, even though security should have been boosted, just two months later there is another near assassination. The location was a known vulnerability on that course; photographers frequently use that very spot to get paparazzi photos, because it’s so near the 6^th hole.

The assassin, we learned, had been in the spot for 12 hours, waiting for his opportunity. He was outside the fence, but along a busy road where he could have been spotted. This means there was not a sweep of the location prior to allowing the protectee to arrive.

The gun was first reported as an AK-47-style weapon with a scope. And AK-47 can’t have a scope. It was later learned what specifically it was. It was a type of weapon illegal in all 50 states. It would have needed to be obtained on the black market at sizable expense. Also, the assassin had a record of arrest for possession of a weapon of mass destruction; he would not have been able to buy any type of gun legally.

Routh lives in Hawaii. He had a failed roofing business. There is video of him in Ukraine two years ago, trying to volunteer to fight or otherwise help in that cause. He was then 56 with no military experience; they rejected him. But he then went on to try recruiting volunteer military, at something like $1200/month/person. He didn’t have money or income; he has a court-appointed attorney.

So there are money questions. How did he afford the trip to Ukraine. Although probably no one took the very low offer to be a volunteer soldier, he was saying he had $14,400/year for each recruit. Ten such recruits would have cost $144,000 a year—more than he made, apparently.

Then, how did he afford the trip to Florida from Hawaii. Even if he was visiting someone in North Carolina, he came at a time when the trip to the golf course wasn’t planned. Locals may have noticed that, anytime there’s a motorcade in that area, it might be because Trump was going golfing. But Routh wasn’t a native. And Trump has a very busy schedule. He was across the country just the day before. How did Routh just happen to show up in Florida on a day when Trump decided last minute to go golfing, and station himself in the location on that course best suited to get within a short-range shot of Trump, many hours ahead of any tell-tale motorcade?

It’s also odd that this man has had multiple encounters with the media. He’s shown on camera in Ukraine. And there are a couple of other instances. Why does this person get picked for media stories multiple times when most human beings never have such encounters?

The Behavior Panel went over his Ukraine videos, where he’s trying to answer the question to Ukraine officials, “What are you doing here?” He explains himself, and the panel agreed, he is a true believer. He thinks that he has identified the most worthy cause and is trying to take action. He seems to have delusions of himself as a hero.

If there were a type of person susceptible to being persuaded to carry out an assassination “to save democracy” from “literally Hitler,” he would be such a person.

We don’t know yet whether that happened, but we don’t know it didn’t. Dan Bongino thinks that he was intended to be another suicide-by-cop, but he bailed and fled, and he submitted passively was caught. So, depending on who interrogates him, there’s a chance we could learn something.

The money is an issue. Chris Martenson also brought this up.

Chris Martenson goes through questions about Routh's money,
screenshot from here

Routh had a very expensive illegal weapon. He prepared with ceramic tiles as body armor (I think he had them in backpacks hanging from the fence, which would have deflected bullets). He had the ability to fly around the world. Yet he had no funds of his own. He was on government radar, both for the odd media appearances and the arrest record. Somehow he knew where to be and when.

Those are a lot of coincidences for a guy who just woke up and decided suddenly to drive to the golf course near Trump’s home and shoot him when he got to the nearest hole.

shared as a Facebook story,
source appears to be @snowflake_news

I don’t think either of these assassins was a lone wolf who just decided to be a Trump assassin. I think they were recruited and incited to take these heinous actions.

One thing government officials have not been doing is using actual rhetoric—clear written or spoken words—to tell us the truth.

 

 

 

Preserving the Constitution Includes Knowing What’s In It

This coming Tuesday is Constitution Day, the 237^th anniversary of the signing of the US Constitution on September 17, 1787. I love our Constitution and try to celebrate it every year. This year in particular it seems urgent to do so. I’m getting offers for ebooks and online courses for educating people on our Constitution, more than usual. And I think it’s because our country, which is based on the law of our Constitution, is on the ballot—up and down the ballot, but particularly in the presidential race.

"Scene at the Signing of the Constitution of the United States" by Howard Chandler Christy
image found on Wikipedia

Back almost a decade ago, I didn’t originally jump on the Trump train, because I didn’t believe he valued our Constitution—until, as President, he more strictly abided by it than we’d seen in decades. I still think he—and everyone around him—needs monitoring; we need to be vigilant in our insistence on abiding by the Constitution, every letter of it. But I believe Donald Trump is someone God can use to defend our inspired Constitution.

On the other hand, his opponent, our current VP (who obviously isn’t running the country, either before or after the coup that has technically dethroned the mentally incapacitated Biden) is the daughter of a socialist/communist professor, who had the most extreme leftist (anti-Constitution) voting record as a one-term senator, who rose to prominence in California by having affairs with political influencers, who champions baby killing as the most important “right” to “protect,” and who lies incessantly—when she can remember what she’s saying at all.

I watched the September 10 presidential debate on Robert Gouveia's
livestream with commentary. Screenshot from here.

Rather than go through this past Tuesday’s debate (there are plenty of people doing that quite thoroughly, including the necessarily ubiquitous fact checking), I will share just a couple of information sources:

·       “Everything You Need to Know About Kamala in Her Own Words in One Place,”  Breitbart’s collection of video clips, by category, September 12, 2024.

·       “Kamala Harris FINALLY put some policy positions on her website. JD Vance offered his thoughts.” This is NotTheBee’s collection of responses from JD Vance to the “policies” that have finally appeared on Kamala Harris’s campaign website (cut and pasted, quite literally, it turns out, from the Biden campaign). This was from just before the debate, September 10, 2024, rather than in response to it. 

One more small point, and then we’ll get back to the Constitution.

I’m affected by sound. The sound of voices. Women tend not to be as likely to have mellifluous voices as men. We lost James Earl Jones this week, whose voice was iconic in its richness. And Viva Frei interviewed Matt Christiansen, one of the content providers affected by the Russia 3.0 attack this past week. I hadn’t heard of Christiansen before, and I haven’t explored his content. But his voice is lovely to listen to.

Megyn Kelly does fine in the female voice category; it's resonant and not too high or low. Others, like Rosanne Barr, are rather grating but interesting; her voice contains both place and personality. I don’t have a great speaking voice either; allergies and age are part of it. Oh well.

Kamala Harris is in an irritating category that spans well beyond ideology. Her sound is nasal. This is not an instrument flaw; we forgive RFK Jr’s instrument challenges and get so we hardly notice. But hers is a wrong-use-of-the-instrument flaw. Anyone can talk with a nasal sound. You simply close the back of your throat and send sound through your nose. To avoid a nasal sound, you open the back of your throat and don’t send all the sound through your nose. For someone in the public eye as long as she has been (she’s supposed to be the young, fresh future, but she’s about to turn 60, and has been political since her 20s), you would think she would have had some voice coach say, “You know, you don’t have to talk like that.” I look forward to a day—soon, I hope—when we no longer have to be subjected to her voice.

US Constitution, first page,
image from Wikipedia

Our Beloved Constitution

I’m doing a sort of “best of” collection today. It turns out I’ve written on the Constitution quite a lot. Often I do that in celebration of Constitution Day. So I’m not going to come up with much new today; I’m going to reference what I’ve already written.

The Constitution is made up of distinct parts: Preamble, Article I (about the legislative branch), Article II (about the executive branch), Article III (about the judicial branch), Article IV (about citizens and states in relation to the government), Article V (about amending the Constitution), Article VI (about the Constitution being the supreme law of the land), and Article VII (about the ratification of the Constitution). Then come the Amendments. Amendments 1-10 were added by the time of the ratification, and are called the Bill of Rights. There are at this time 27 amendments, including those original 10.

The Constitution is not long—4,543 words (before the amendments). It’s a legal document, yet surprisingly clear and easy to read, despite some evolution of language over the past couple of centuries. That was the point I was making in 2020, when I wrote a series summarizing the first three articles.

So I’m starting with that collection today, and then adding in a number of other Constitution celebrations that I hope, in totality, would make a good primer for a budding Constitution scholar.

·       Try Reading the Constitution, Part I, September 17, 2020: This is an introduction to the series. 

·       Try Reading the Constitution, Part II, September 22, 2020: This pertains to Article I, the legislative branch. 

·       Try Reading the Constitution, Part III, September 25, 2020: This pertains to Article II, the executive branch. 

·       Try Reading the Constitution, Part IV, September 29, 2020: This pertains to Article II, the judicial branch. 

I had previously written about the Preamble, which probably belongs with this summary:

·       Review of the Proper Role of Government, March 31, 2016: This goes through the meaning and importance of the Preamble, which identifies the proper role of government. 

Now for some others, mostly from Constitution Day posts, plus a few other times I wrote about the Constitution. I hope these add to and enrich your understanding of the Constitution:

·        Celebrating the Constitution, September 16, 2011 

·        Constitutionalism, September 22, 2011 

·        Happy 225th Birthday, September 17, 2012 

·        Remembering Constitution Day, September 18, 2013 

·        Timeless Constitution, September 19, 2016 

·        Revering the Constitution, September 18, 2017 

·        Can We Keep It? September 17, 2018 

·        Constitution Quiz, September 19, 2019 

·        No, We Haven’t Evolved Beyond Our Constitution, September 23, 2021 

·        Our Miraculous Constitution, September 15, 2022 

·        Divinely Inspired Constitutional Principles, April 5, 2021 

·        One Nation Under God, June 30, 2023 

·        Resistance Is Necessary, December 20, 2020