|  | 
| Baby Political Sphere gets to know Governor Perry | 
It may be that it is necessary for any elected executive leader to be checked by constituents who don’t totally trust him. Maybe that mix makes for the generally conservative principles at play in the Texas   
Lest we make the rest of the US  too envious, Texas Texas Texas   
As I said yesterday, every time I hear Perry talk, it’s all conservative. I was excited to have him as governor when he replaced George W. Bush at the end of 2000. I even thought, maybe down the line he will become a viable presidential candidate. Then somewhere around 2003-2005, the VLT issue came up (I wrote about video lottery terminals on March 22nd). It may be that his position was actually just exploring what the people felt about the issue. But it appeared that the lobbying of the gambling industry was persuading him to support this plague. People uprising against the issue took it off the table—which happened again this legislative session as it has every two years since. But that was the first time I felt I couldn’t quite trust Perry.  
The Trans-Texas Corridor is an issue where many people part ways with Perry. This was to be a network of 4000 miles connecting major metro centers of the state (and in some views attempting to make easy access from Mexico  to Canada Texas   
There was a problem with the business franchise tax in 2006. Granted, Texas   
The biggest issue marking him as a big-government interferer was the mandate to vaccinate all girls 12 and up with Gardasil, for HPV (human papilloma virus). He had listened to the pharmaceutical lobby. They essentially convinced him this was the way to protect young women from cervical cancer. Making such a vaccine available, maybe with discounts for the indigent, might have been a tolerable approach—mandate was not. The drug only deals with a couple of the various viruses that cause HPV (a couple of the most common ones, but certainly not all of them), so there was no guarantee that the drug would fully protect young women as ads often implied. Also, the drug had been tested on 16-26-year-olds, so there was question about the safety for 12-year-olds. In addition, this is a sexually transmitted disease—so a young woman who is not sexually active is simply not at risk. Plenty of mothers would opt to keep their daughters safe from the disease by teaching them sexual purity before marriage, rather than risking the side effects (which had included a few deaths) of a drug that would only give partial protection and would do nothing about the disease in the males who were spreading it. In addition, the disease is easily prevented with an annual pap smear with follow-up for any positive result. So the state mandate was a huge overreach of intrusive government. The people of Texas   
Do I think Governor Perry is a RINO? No, I think he believes he is truly conservative. And here in Texas   
Perry has been a good friend to homeschoolers. He has been a friend of social conservatives—those of us against abortion and in favor of protecting marriage. And he understands states rights enough that nullification of ObamaCare is a possibility here. He has put an anti-groping bill (against TSA intrusive airport screenings) and a freedom of lightbulb choice bill on the agenda for the current special session—where nothing but the budget and anything the governor insists on gets put on the agenda.   
I don’t know yet whether he will run. If he does, he’s still on my list of possibles (the long list all of whom pretty much entirely outshine the Obama/Biden ticket in every way). Perry isn’t perfect, and I have reservations. But the flaws aren’t what I call disqualifying. You can decide for yourself.
 
The one place I have always disagreed with other conservatives who complain about Governor Perry is his trans-Texas corridor idea. I went to school for urban planning and specialized, where I could, in transportation planning. I admired the well planned idea of using the existing interstate system in Texas, and expanding it to meet Texas' transportation and shipping needs far into the future. The reason it failed was because of the large rancher lobby, because they had money and were able to misinform the urban and suburban public better than Perry was able to market the benefits of the plan. It essentially linked the major urban centers in Texas, through the current highway system, by providing three to four lanes of traffic in each direction. Anyone who has traveled on I-10 between San Antonio and Houston, I-45 between Houston and Dallas, or I-35 between San Antonio and Fort Worth could see the benefit of a couple more lanes in each direction. Then, to provide for more commercial shipping without further straining the vehicular capacity of the roads the plan was to provide two to four mid to high speed rail lines in the center median of the freeway. The only downside to this plan was that it would essentially double the right of way necessary compared to doing nothing to combat the traffic problems currently plaguing the corridors.
ReplyDelete