Still Fighting the Swamp in Texas

While this is a blog related to political philosophy, I only occasionally write about actual politics. But this is one of those days, with some inside baseball-type details.

Luke Macias, of Texas Scorecard, gives the details better than anybody, so you may want to listen to him on this. We’re talking about what happened last Saturday, December 7, when the Republican Caucus of the Texas House met to choose their speaker—or, technically, to go over rules and try to come to agreement. I think an actual physical vote happens in January when the full House meets at the start of session.

The Texas House is at a hinge point: either
keep the swamp or listen to the voice of
the people and let conservatives lead.
Image from a visit to the Texas Capitol
with the grandkids in 2018.

Texas is a red state, with blue and purple pockets, mainly in the big urban areas. And we just moved even more red this election. Even Harris County elected several Republican judges and a couple of other countywide positions. So you’d think it would be a given that the House Republicans would get together and agree on their leadership. But that hasn’t been happening.

This has been a frustration in the state for quite a while. Some nominal Republican makes backroom deals with the full contingent of Democrats, and then adds a few Republicans, and gets themselves elected as the Republican-majority Speaker. We saw it with Straus, and most recently with Dade Phelan. Phelan, you may recall, was on video, apparently drunk while wielding the gavel at the end of the 2023 session. I don’t know whether that was the actual explanation for the slurring, but it sure looked like it.

Phelan wielded a lot of power. He kept Republicans supporting him by giving money to their campaign coffers (I think he apportions it from some fund; it doesn’t come out of his own pocket), and by promising them committee assignments that matter to them. He does the same with Democrats.

In our platform, we’ve been calling for no Democrat committee chairs; Phelan refused to listen. So Phelan was primaried this past February, and people from around the state went to his district to block walk and do the retail campaign work. His opponent very nearly took him out, but Phelan managed to win—we think by having Democrats cross over and vote in the Republican Primary.

Phelan was insisting he’d be Speaker nevertheless. There were challengers, and it had come down to David Cook. Early on Tom Oliverson had put his hat in the ring; he’s local and reliably conservative, and promised to end the Democrat chairs so we could get some legislation through this next session. I don’t know when he dropped out, but the conservatives I know are satisfied with Cook. I don’t personally know much about him, so I am going on trust.

Rep. David Cook is the Republican Caucus choice for Texas House Speaker.
Image and contact info from his House website.

We precinct chairs wrote resolutions, and sent letters, emails, etc., to pressure our legislators to vote for a conservative who would end Democrat chairs—and that could not be Phelan. I think maybe Phelan felt the lack of support might be insurmountable, because of the disdain he has drawn. Anyway, last week he dropped out of the race—but recommended a substitute who would keep the little fiefdom of RINOs alive: Dustin Burrows. Burrows was the Calendars Committee Chair last session. And Calendars is where good bills go to die. In that position, he could just keep bills from getting a floor vote. The story of the last session was, good bills came out of the Senate, which either never got assigned to committee, or weren’t heard in committee, or didn’t come out of committee, or died in Calendars when didn’t get scheduled for a floor vote. The Governor’s priorities couldn’t even get done in multiple special sessions, after the failure of the regular session.

On Saturday, at that Caucus meeting, they decided on rules, which included that the entire Republican Caucus would vote together on their choice, rather than letting the Democrat minority plus a few Republicans choose the Speaker.

During two votes, no one got the needed number of votes. Then, during a short break, the Burrows group asked for a longer break—which is not supposed to happen; votes come right after one another to avoid dealmaking and undue pressure. Three hours later they still hadn’t come back. They had tried to break quorum. The remaining members easily elected David Cook. But simultaneously Burrows announced that he had the votes and would be the new speaker. He claimed to have all the Democrat votes plus enough Republicans to put him over the top.

Rep. Burrows, Phelan's choice as the House Speaker,
combined with Democrats and a relatively small
contingent of Republicans to claim he had the votes
to be the next Speaker. He is not conservative, and
he is not the choice of the House Republican Caucus.
Image from his House website.

He had the hubris to put out a list, and almost immediately eight on that list declared that they were not voting for Burrows and had not given him their endorsement. Even some Democrats said that; they had other Democrat choices, so why would they vote for a Republican? And a few were on both the Burrows and Cook lists, so their allegiance was unclear.

What we were seeing was the backroom deal that they’d done clandestinely in the past, but now, maybe because of desperation, they were doing it brazenly and openly. A raw push for power. In this case, even without the actual votes, they seemed to think, if they said it, people would cave, because that had always worked in the past.

Over the next day or so, pressure came on those who were on the Burrows list, or both lists. Here in Harris County, we saw Mano De Ayala and Sam Harless declare for Cook (although Mano’s was rather tepid, sort of a “well, that’s the rule, so I’ll abide by it”). The only holdout in the county is my representative, Lacey Hull.

Lacey Hull, and contact info, from her House website

She fell in with the Phelan swamp almost the moment she got elected in 2020, which was a disappointment. She had talked the conservative talk in her campaign. She’s a pleasant personality, and I still find her open and willing to talk about our important issues (not that this is a common occurrence, but I met with her in her office before the 2023 session, and I see her at occasional political events that precinct chairs go to). On a few issues she even works on with enthusiasm. But there are other things she’s just been weak on, for reasons that are hard to explain, other than the swamp milieu. She voted for the AG Ken Paxton impeachment—because the allegations were serious, but not because the evidence had been brought in that two-day sham hearing sprung on everybody at the end of session in 2023. It’s hard to dismiss that.

She was primaried both in 2022 and 2024. But there’s power in incumbency. I supported an opponent in 2022, and Hull nevertheless treated me as though she was unaware of that, which was helpful. In 2024 I didn’t feel good about her opponent, so, with misgivings, I voted for Lacey Hull. I had ended up campaigning for precinct chair at the early voting location where Lacey’s mother was campaigning for Lacey, and her mother is as pleasant to be around as she is. It’s hard not to like Lacey Hull. But I continue to be disappointed that she didn’t turn out to be the solid conservative we thought we were electing. (There are personal scandals people talk about; I haven’t ever talked about them with her, but my assumption is they’re true, unfortunately. It means less support for family values.)

So, how do we persuade a person to do the right thing? It has to be by convincing them it’s in their best interest.

I don’t know what she was getting, exactly, from Phelan and his minions. But maybe if she realized what support she would get by standing up for conservative causes, she wouldn’t miss having to do shady deals with the devil. Maybe she could actually convert to being a conservative bright star. I think that would be a great outcome. We could have a successful conservative session—unblocked by RINO obstructionists—and we’d be happy to let her take credit for that in her next campaign.

The precinct chairs in the entire County have been putting pressure on our representatives. Last Monday, the Harris County Republican Party passed a resolution calling for all the Republicans in the County to follow the Caucus rules and vote with the Caucus for David Cook.

With Lacey Hull now as the last holdout in the County, all the pressure will now be aimed at her. The precinct chairs in her district (me included) are sending out a resolution—a statement letting her know that we expect her to abide by Caucus rules, and will be sending that to media as well. Statewide, the County Republican Chairs have all signed resolutions pressuring the 26 or so holdouts. President-elect Trump has tweeted about the Texas Speaker race—and he’s on the conservative side with us.

Meanwhile, I’ve been getting campaign texts galore from Burrows—describing Cook as a RINO and claiming to be the conservative who fights for Governor Abbott’s conservative agenda, which Burrows literally stonewalled last session. The lies are blatant. They’re asking people in the districts on Burrows’ list to contact their representative and tell them to support the “conservative,” Burrows, for Speaker.

This is a screenshot from a text sent
to my phone on December 10. This is 
a blatant lie. Cook didn't solicit support
from the Democrats; Burrows literally
and openly did that. This text was linked
to something called redgop.vote.

This pro-Burrows text also came to my phone
on December 10. And this is also a lie:
Burrows deliberately thwarted conservative bills
in the last session. And Burrows is certainly
not "the most conservative member
of the Texas House." The text was signed
"Paul, The American Opportunity PAC"

We thought the ubiquitous campaign texts were coming to an end, after the November election. This isn’t even a campaign the people can vote on; all they can do is let their representatives know their opinions. And, unless you’re paying attention to something like this—during the post-election, Christmas season—you might believe you’re doing the right thing to tell your representative to vote for the conservative, but just have the wrong name attached. These aren’t coming to the neighboring districts, by the way. Just to the ones Burrows doesn’t want to lose, or maybe some he thinks he can gain back.

It's not going to work. We’re determined to get a conservative Speaker this time. “Be not weary in well doing,” right? But I the need to fight for conservatism in Texas is relentless.