There are things related to COVID-19 that I’ve been trying to piece together, as a regular citizen without expertise, since the whole thing started. And I’ve been surprised at the things that get labeled conspiracy theories that later get borne out as true. That is happening.
My reading list has grown considerably this week. In one
video Dr. Ryan Cole quoted Mark Twain, saying, “The man who doesn’t read has no advantage over the man who cannot read.” The information is out there to be had.
And a thinking person can find it. Thinking leads to the right questions, which
eventually lead to true answers.
 |
| cover image from Amazon |
· The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health, by Robert F. Kennedy,
Jr.
Kennedy was interviewed on Tucker Carlson Today, on November 15, 2021, an episode called “Coup de Vax.” He talks about a partnership between Fauci and Bill Gates, who came together with a plan to vaccinate essentially all of mankind. There’s a five-minute segment, mostly about Gates, that describes the type of corruption going on. And it’s a good illustration. Then we’ll go on to some of the dots that can be connected for Fauci’s personal culpability:
He began using his philanthropy to create a series of other
quasi-governmental agencies: CEPI, GAVI, and a number of others. And then to
gain control of the WHO.
He calls what he does philanthrocapitalism. It’s not about philanthropy; it’s about enriching the capitalist. What he does is, he buys—and he does this in a number of areas I show in the book. He does it with food. He did it with core curriculum. He buys large stakes in companies that could benefit from a change in governmental policies, a worldwide change in governmental policies.
So he owns stakes, very very large stakes, in almost all the big
pharmaceutical companies. Then he gives essentially about a billion dollars to
WHO every year. But through Rotary International, through GAVI, through CEPI, and
through the Gates Foundation—where the accumulation is even larger than the US,
which is the second biggest. That gives him control over WHO’s policies. The
analysts of WHO say there is nothing that goes through WHO that is unvetted first
by the Gates Foundation.
And WHO controls the HIV money, and it funds the health
agencies of most African countries. So they’re completely reliant on those annual
checks from WHO. And what Gates and WHO do—or WHO on Gates’ behalf, because a
lot of people at WHO do not want to do this—he is taking them away from their
traditional occupations, which was economic development, hygiene, food supply,
food production, and local democracy and local controls. So, WHO does very
little of those things now, and they really focus—over 50% of their budget focuses
on one of Gates’ vaccines only, the polio vaccine, which is a flawed vaccine.
The polio vaccine, according to WHO’s own number, causes 70% of the polio on
earth every year. So it’s not a successful vaccine.
But, what he does then is, he, through WHO—WHO will go in and
say to an African country, “If you want your annual check from us, here’s what
you’ve got to do. You have to show an 80% uptake of the DTP vaccine.” The DTP
vaccine we don’t use in white countries, the United States. That’s the vaccine
that was killing one out of every 300 kids. We got rid of it. Europeans got rid
of it. But Gates gives 161 million African children that vaccine every year.
And what he’ll say is, he’ll say—the WHO will say to this country, “You don’t
get your HIV money; you don’t your systems money to run your health agency,
unless you can show us you’ve vaccinated 80% of your kids”—that’s a hypothetical
number, but it will be something like that—“with the DTP vaccine.” So those
countries, then, are forced to buy that vaccine. And that vaccine, they have to
purchase it ultimately from one of the companies that Gates is heavily invested
in.
And Gates— He has a $33 billion corpus that he has put in the
Gates Foundation, but it’s still his money. He’s still controlling it. And it’s
now tax-deductible. It’s shielded from taxes. And he is now deploying it to
change government policies in a way that it enriches companies that he’s elsewhere
invested in.
And he does the same thing with food. He has switched many
millions of Africans from subsistence that they’ve been doing successfully for,
you know, 10,000 generations, to GMO crops, to heavily, you know, lots of
chemical agriculture, carbon-based fertilizers—all have to be imported by his
companies. He has huge investments in Monsanto, Cargill, and in the processed
food companies that are then buying up those commodities cheap: Coca-Cola,
McDonald’s, and Kraft Cheese. Those kinds of things.
So, the more you look at it, the more corrupt it gets.
But his deal with Tony Fauci—you know, which I go into in detail,
what the result, the outcome for that bargain on the lives and health of
millions and millions of Africans and South Asians has been absolutely
catastrophic.
On a related note, there was this story today about Gates,
doing what Kennedy described above, in the area of media:
· “Bill Gates has given $319 million to bankroll select media outlets and change the public narrative—and the internet has receipts” by Sarah Taylor for The Blaze, November 18, 2021.
 |
| cover image from Amazon |
·
Faucian Bargain: The Most Powerful and Dangerous Bureaucrat in American History, by Steve Deace and Todd Erzen
Glenn Beck did another major explanation of corruption, called "Crimes and Cover-Up: Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie." It
took three chalkboards. I was a full two hours. So far it’s still available on
YouTube, and will continue to be available on BlazeTV
(with subscription).
Many of the details are things I have come across before. He
traces the history of SARS back to 2002. Anthony Fauci, before that, was
attempting to come up with a vaccine for HIV, but he was doing it with an early
version of mRNA, which didn’t qualify as a vaccine, by definition (the
definition recently changed to accommodate the COVID-19 mRNA vaccines) and wasn’t
effective. But he has been determined to come up with this new vaccine
technology and have it be required for everyone in the world to take.
If you go through the history, you’ll see the connections
between Dr. Baric of, I think, North Carolina University, and Dr. Shi Zhengli—the
one called “the bat lady”—from China. Add in Peter Daszak, of EcoHealth, who
managed funding from NIH to the Wuhan lab during the time government funding
was disallowed for gain-of-function research. Dr. Fauci is involved in all of
that. And recent emails show that he recognized the problems with the probable
lab-leak revealing their secret funding.
There’s a careful timeline, with backup materials Beck says to go through yourself. So I downloaded those. It includes a three-page PDF list of sources. At the bottom it thanks DRASTIC research “for their tireless pursuit of the truth,” and then links to their in-depth work. I followed the link to here.
Concerning Fauci they have this segment:
Fauci approved a grant of $600,000 to the WIV [Wuhan
Institute of Virology] for bat coronavirus research. Fauci has sworn to Congress that this was not
for “gain-of-function” research. Fauci
was relying on a very narrow definition of the term, in which the purpose of
the research was to produce more potent viruses.
There is no doubt that the type of genetic engineering
conducted at the WIV and other research institutions could have produced potent
viruses, even if its purpose was simply to examine the effects of such
manipulation. Fauci and others involved
in the grant, such as Peter Daszak, have a clear interest in the virus not to have
been produced as a result of this research.
It will take some time to go through all of this material. But if Beck’s summary is accurate—and I believe it is, because so much coincides with what I’m seeing elsewhere and have been collecting from multiple sources for well over a year—then we can see in real time the kind of worldwide corruption that we thought we left behind in the last century: the needless deaths of millions of people because of the selfish designs of tyrants who claim they care about “the collective” while disposing of anyone they don’t care about. And they don’t care about anyone who questions them, disagrees with them, or simply can’t grant them more power.
 |
| Glenn Beck presenting a chalkboard discussion "Crimes and Cover-Up: Exposing the World's Most Dangerous Lie." screenshot from here |
When he reviews the three chalkboards, he points out that,
on that first one, titled “The Vaccine Arms Race,” the main players, Dr. Ralph
Baric, Dr. Shi Zhengli—“the bat lady” of China—and Peter Daszak of EcoHealth
Alliance are there from the beginning and throughout. But at the point he’s not
ascribing ill intent. As he says,
These people actually believe that they should check all
animals for all viruses. And they should find a vaccine for all of them, so
we’ll always be prepared. OK, I think that’s insane. Very dangerous. But then
again, I’ve been to the movie theater before.
But then there’s the big lie. There’s the connection to
Anthony Fauci. He managed to pay for gain-of-function research—rather, he used
our taxpayer dollars to pay for it, by funneling grant money through EcoHealth,
during the years using government funding for it was not allowed. And then
there’s this connection with Moderna, from 2015 on, and some very suspicious
timing issues, and missing information.
On the second chalkboard, titled “The Pandemic Begins,” is
where things start to look sleazy, with public-private partnerships popping up
in places that benefit whoever Fauci decides they should benefit.
The real disturbing part is on the third chalkboard, title “Censorship
& Cover-Up,” where he goes through a number of those Fauci emails that were
recently released. There’s this part:
Two of the three men directing this propaganda campaign—and,
make no mistake, as you will see, that’s exactly what it is. They were supposed
to be part of Trump’s administration. Look at all of these facts. Is there any
other way to describe it other than Fauci and the President’s science advisor
colluding behind the President’s back, withholding information from him. Fauci
has already been brought in front of Congress, and Rand Paul caught him in a
bold-faced lie. Fauci will testify again. But it’s probably time to bring in
the former president’s science advisor as well. Just a few, a couple questions,
like, “Did you withhold information from the President? Did you ever lie to
him?” That’s what will get it started.
Once you’ve watched Glenn Beck’s special, follow it up with
Steve Deace’s panel discussion with Dr. Ryan Cole and Daniel Horowitz, titled “Crimes or Cover-Up? Answering the Forbidden Questions of COVID-19,” on The Blaze.
 |
| cover image from Amazon |
·
A Plague Upon Our House: My Fight at the
Trump White House to Stop COVID from Destroying America, Dr. Scott W.
Atlas, MD
I learned about it from his conversation with Tucker Carlson from November 17. Dr. Atlas was brought in to advise President Trump in late summer 2020. What he
faced there was a “troika” of doctors: Birx, Fauci, and Redfield. All had
worked together from back in the days of trying to develop an HIV vaccine. All
are bureaucrats rather than doctors who see patients.
What surprised Dr. Atlas was how they never referred to any
data during their meetings. He would bring in multiple studies for every
meeting. They didn’t refute any of them. They simply ignored all data.
I’ve sensed that Dr. Redfield would like to have been more
open to discussion, because he has been, somewhat, since his retirement. But
that doesn’t excuse the utter lack of working with data during those task force
meetings. The other two are probably beyond excuse. Dr. Atlas also couldn’t
understand their lack of critical thinking.
So, after this sort of bombardment of info this week—all from
independent sources, rather than what we now tend to call “legacy media”—maybe we’ll
just list a few of the questions that come up when you look at what’s happening
and do some critical thinking:
· Why did we quarantine healthy people, instead of
the most vulnerable, unlike all past disease outbreaks?
· Why did “15 days to flatten the curve,” to avoid
overwhelming the hospitals turn into 18 months (and counting) of “eradicate the
disease” without any explanation for moving the goalposts?
· Why is natural immunity ignored or dismissed, as
if it doesn’t exist—when what doesn’t exist is any study showing it doesn’t
exist?
· Why is a vaccine being pushed for everyone,
regardless of their risk factors, age, or natural immunity?
· Why are vaccine injuries ignored?
· Why was the definition of vaccine changed to
remove the term “immunity”?
· Why is the vaccine still being pushed (and
attempted to be mandated) when it does no more than lessen virulence, and weakens
in even that effectiveness within months?
· Why have cheap, effective, safe drugs been
banned?
· Why have doctors been threatened for treating
patients with treatments that work?
· Why is damage to the economy and to other parts
of public health ignored, with focus all on one single illness?
· What has the censorship been intended to accomplish?
· Why has the virus origin still not been found?
Or that the probable origin location not acknowledged?
· Who is to blame for the unnecessary deaths?
· Why have so many people been willing to submit
to edicts from elite doctors who do not provide their reasoning backed by data?
· When will we stop the harmful lockdowns,
shutdowns, and masks and get back to some sort of normal life?
· When will the story of collusion and cover-up
become common knowledge?
One last rather important question: When we are among those who have learned
the truth, what do we do with it?
No comments:
Post a Comment