The biannual 140-day legislative session in the State of Texas ended last Monday, May 31st (yes, on a holiday, and they worked Sunday as well). So it’s probably timely to go over what got done, and what didn’t.
Lt. Governor Dan Patrick gavels the close of the 87th Texas Legislative Session, screenshot from KVUE news video |
Last summer, at the state Republican convention, the
delegates chose eight legislative priorities. This was done in a creative way,
which actually worked out OK with the convention converted to online. During
the committee working days, in person, ahead of the convention, the Legislative
Priorities Committee took input from around the state and narrowed that down to
(as I recall) 16. The delegates then prioritized their top 8, and weighted
their votes accordingly, letting the math come up with the final 8 priorities.
The Republican Party of Texas convention is bigger than the
national GOP convention. Bigger than any other state convention. This was input
from over 7,000 people around the entire state of Texas, declaring what they
wanted the legislature to work on.
These are the eight, each of which had wording to clarify:
1. Election
Integrity: Require citizenship verification of each voter, and felony
penalties for Election Code violations that threaten election integrity.
2. Religious
Freedom: Restore the rights of individuals, organizations and businesses,
to exercise their sincerely held religious beliefs by prohibiting local ordinances,
state laws, or executive orders that violate those rights.
3. Children
and Gender Modification: Abolish the following practices for minors:
intervention to prevent natural progression of puberty; administration of
opposite sex hormones; and performance of any type of gender reassignment
surgery.
4. Abolition
of Abortion: Abolish abortion by ensuring the right to life and equal
protection of the laws to all preborn children from the moment of
fertilization.
5. Constitutional
Carry: Restore legal Texas firearms owners’ rights to carry them openly or
concealed without a permit, while maintaining the option of a permit for
reciprocity purposes.
6. Monument
Protection: All monuments or markers in our state shall be protected by law
from being removed, defaced, destroyed, or otherwise dishonored. In particular,
specific protection shall be given to the Alamo Cenotaph which shall not be
removed from its current location off the Alamo Battlefield footprint.
7. School
Choice: Empower parents and guardians to choose from public, private,
charter, or homeschool options for their children’s education using tax credits
or exemptions without government restraint or intrusion.
8. Ban
Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying: Abolish all forms of taxpayer-funded lobbying.
This is all in addition to the state Republican Party Platform, which is also used to tell legislators what to work on—but it is bigger, with around 340 planks, categorized by senatorial committee titles, and a lot of detail, but without priorities. Except that, at the front of the platform document is a list of ten permanent guiding principles of the party:
Principles at the beginning of the Republican Party of Texas 2020 Platform |
We Texans are in a state where the Republican Party controls the majority
in the House, the Senate, and the Governor—along with Lt. Governor, Attorney
General, and any other statewide office. This has been the case for beyond the past
two decades.
So you would think it would occur to lawmakers to consider
the will of the people who elected them.
Rotunda at the Texas State Capitol, from 2018 |
They were familiar with the Governor’s list of priorities.
And they were aware of their own legislator’s priorities, if such a list had
been made. That was the extent of the knowledge in far too many offices.
Going forward, educating staff ahead of the session will be
an additional task Republicans will have to undertake in order to be heard and
not dismissed as just those pesky demanding grassroots whose votes can be taken
for granted.
I’ll take the priorities in order and say what was and wasn’t
accomplished with each.
ELECTION INTEGRITY
Of the bills I followed, two passed: SB 1113 on cleaning voter rolls,
authored by my state senator, Paul Bettencourt, and also Sen. Lois Kolkhorst just
to the north of here; and HB 574 making certain election offenses
criminal offenses. Both were useful.
But the bill that we really needed was SB 7 which was an omnibus election
integrity bill, containing multiple improvements, many of them reinforcing
current law that was flouted during the past election season, using the
pandemic as a pretext for the lawlessness.
It passed in the Senate and then the House, with amendments.
There was a reconciliation committee, and the Senate approved the committee’s
reconciliation. Late at night, on the last day to legally finish business, the House
Democrats were instructed by text to discretely leave the chamber, denying a
quorum so that a final vote could not be taken in the House on the
reconciliation.
There’s argument about who to blame. Certainly the Democrats
who participated in the walkout. But the House Speaker, Republican Dade Phelan,
could have called the Sergeant-at-Arms to bring them back into the chamber. He
didn’t. And there’s speculation about his indicating to them ahead of time that
he wouldn’t.
Phelan replaces a Republican House Speaker who was caught
making deals against Republicans. We were hopeful that we would finally have a
better session. I’m sure we’re going to be told it was better. But, seriously,
Republicans seem to be unable to wield power, and instead seem overly eager to
conspire with the enemies of freedom against the free people of Texas.
Governor Abbott has declared he will take action in response
to these shenanigans:
· He plans to have a special session to handle
this bill. It is unknown whether that will be soon or in the fall when the
redistricting special session will happen. So far he hasn’t scheduled it.
· He has promised to veto Article 10 of the
budget, to deny funding to pay legislators until they fulfill their
obligations. (As far as I know, he hasn’t yet followed through on this threat.)
You can view Lt. Governor Dan Patrick on Fox News talking about this event, here. Senator Paul Bettencourt comments on what happened here.
It seems to me, if there’s a will to pass a bill, it passes.
If there isn’t, it doesn’t. But there’s always plenty of cover—that there wasn’t
time, that there was too much opposition. This is what frustrates so many of
us.
RELIGIOUS FREEDOM
There were several minor religious
freedom bills that passed. That’s good, but they mostly reiterated freedoms
already guaranteed to us in our state and federal constitutions. These are:
· SB 581 Bettencourt: HOAs must
allow homeowners to have religious displays.
· HB 525
Shaheen: Protect religious organizations.
· SB 797 Hughes: The national
motto is to be displayed in schools and institutes of higher education.
· HCR 1 Stephenson: Support
Prayer at public gatherings.
· HB 1239 Sanford: Prohibit suspension of religious freedom. (This is in relation to the pandemic response.)
· SJR 27 Hancock: Proposing a constitutional amendment to prohibit limiting religious service.
GENDER MODIFICATION
This priority was an abject failure. SB 1646 would have changed the definition of child abuse to include permanent gender modification. It passed in the Senate and was assigned to the House Public Health Committee but did not receive a hearing—where the committee is chaired by Republican Stephanie Klick. SB 1311 went about the issue through an insurance angle. It passed in the Senate and was eventually assigned—late, but seemed to be given a deadline exception—again, to the House Public Health Committee, but did not receive a hearing.
There’s a case in Texas, a boy named
James, a twin, whose mother treats him as a girl and wants to permanently
transition him, but he claims to be a boy with his father and doesn’t want to
be a girl. (I wrote about this here and here.) This is a very confused child—and it
appears to me the confusion is caused by a mother I would consider abusive.
James is not safe from this permanent mutilation, nor are other confused Texas children. And now it will be another
two years before there’s an opportunity for the legislature to deal with the
issue.
ABORTION
A couple of relatively positive abortion bills passed. SB
8 prevents
abortion after the heartbeat is detected. Similar bills in other states have so
far failed to prevent abortions, due to lawsuits and skirting the law. (An
ultrasound technician admits that it’s possible to find or not find a heartbeat
at will, at least up to a point.) The Texas bill has the innovation that individual
civilians can file suit against an abortion provider, rather than depending on
a district attorney to decide to prosecute.
HB 1280 is called a trigger bill, meaning
it comes into play, abolishing abortion in Texas, if/when Roe v. Wade is
reversed in the US Supreme Court.
We had a good bill to actually abolish abortion, HB 3326. It didn’t even get a hearing
in the supposedly Republican-led House; this was, once again, the committee led
by Rep. Stephanie Klick.
CONSTITUTIONAL CARRY
This is being hailed as the
brightest success of this legislative session. HB 1927
passed and has been sent to the Governor for signature.
This isn’t as clean a win as you would suppose. The original bill, passed in the House without amendment, had numerous serious issues. These ranged from minor (repetition, and contradiction between sections within the bill) to major (eliminating illegal carry for violent gang members age 21 or over, and some probable cause issues). The Senate attempted to correct the problems. One solution was an entirely new bill; that didn’t fly, so they had to amend.
The amendments were a pretty reasonable attempt to solve the issues. But they were met with cries of “attempted sabotage” and "poison pill amendments" from the writers of the bill and supporting organizations (mainly GOA Texas). Nevertheless, the Senate passed the amended bill, which meant there would be a committee to reconcile. This meant ending up with an OK-for-the-most-part bill. It ends up granting the ability for felons legitimately convicted of illegal carry to have their records expunged. Not good. But we can hope the remaining problems can be dealt with in courts.
The lesson here is, read the
bill. Most of those crying their strong support hadn’t read the actual
wording or considered the legitimate issues law enforcement has to face. A
constitutional carry bill in the free state of Texas shouldn’t have caused that
kind of rift in the party that is soundly pro-Second Amendment.
MONUMENT PROTECTION
There was a minor victory in this priority. HB 3584 to protect monuments and
markers by the Texas Historical Commission was able to pass.
Then there was a bill directing the General Land Office to
maintain the Alamo that didn’t pass.
ASIDE
Meanwhile,
the General Land Commissioner, George P. Bush (yes, a relative of that family)
is leaving that job. He was much maligned for his attempts to protect and
improve the Alamo site—much of which I thought was good, but which included
relocating the Cenotaph to another location in the compound; that got a lot of
people very upset—but he was nevertheless qualified by education and background
to be Land Commissioner. He has announced he is running for Attorney General, a
position I don’t see that he is qualified for, and it’s against a Republican
incumbent, Ken Paxton, who may not be as stellar as Governor Abbott had
previously been in that position, but who is generally well regarded.
While we’re
interrupting to mention job endings and political campaigns, just days after
the close of session Republican Party of Texas Chair Allen West announced he
will be stepping down—less than a year into his first term; he was elected at
the state convention last July. West, I think, has been good at public
messaging. He has been less good at the nitty-gritty duties of the party chair,
which have in the past included working with the legislature. It’s a
fundraising and administrative position. I don’t think that is what holds his
interests. It’s unfortunate that his campaign ousted a chair who was
particularly good at those things.
Speculation
is that West will run for governor. Governor Abbott has already received the
endorsement of Donald Trump. But he has upset a great many former supporters
(myself included) this past year by failing to uphold our constitutional rights
during the pandemic response. And he attempted (but failed) during the legislative
session to institutionalize the executive powers he usurped during this past
year. That makes him vulnerable, and West probably sees that. But, if West
can’t do the administrative work of the party for even a year—and he’s pretty
cavalier about leaving us in the lurch—why would we think he’d be good at
administration of this very large state? We would probably speculate that he
has his sites set on running for US president in 2026, with barely a term as
governor under his belt, but the governor title would help him in such a
campaign.
OK, the
aside is over.
EDUCATION/SCHOOL
CHOICE
We had one very excellent school choice bill: SB 1968 The Family Educational
Relief Program, authored by my state senator, Sen. Paul Bettencourt. It allowed low-income
families to be granted a portion of their child’s allotment to be used for
educational purposes, with the parents as trustees over their child’s fund. It
would have taken zero dollars from public schooling, and it added funding in a
creative way, related to business insurance premium taxes, that actually added to the education budget.
Each of these legislative priorities had a statewide committee from
the SREC (State Republican Executive Committee) to work on getting legislation
passed. I was invited to help out with this one, as a citizen (I am not on the
SREC, which has just one man and one woman from each senatorial district). Anyway,
I got very familiar with this bill, and I’m extremely disappointed with its
failure.
The bill was filed on the last possible day of filing. It got a committee hearing on nearly the last possible day, and got voted out of committee—where there was plenty of good pro-school choice testimony and no opposition testimony—at the last possible moment. There was still time for a floor vote, but it didn’t get one. Lt. Gov. Dan Patrick said it didn’t have the votes. We had one Democrat who voted for the bill in committee, but Sen. Perry, a Republican voted against, so I’m assuming he’s one of the four who indicated to Patrick that they would vote against. Others may know some of the other names, but I do not; when we find out, we should get the word out to get them primaried next year.
There was much opposition to school choice in the House—if it
had gotten that far. This was displayed in a vote on the budget, which had an
amendment slipped in to disallow any funding for any type of school choice of
any kind whatsoever. The amendment passed with a vote of 115 to 29. That means a whole lot of
Republicans voted with all the Democrats to keep low-income students in failing
schools with no way out. And this was a policy amendment, which has no place in
a budget; it circumvents the committee hearing process. I’ve kept the record of
the vote so we know who to target in the primary. (Note: We were promised by
senators on the conference committee that it would be removed during
reconciliation. I’ve gone through the final budget, here, and it does appear this anti-school choice amendment was removed.)
In testimony on this amendment, Rep. Steve Toth brought up
the polling data: all over Texas, among every demographic and party, no less
than 70% approve of school choice. It’s one of our 8 legislative priorities;
and it’s one of our 10 party principles. And yet a majority of Republican
lawmakers—along with nearly all Democrat lawmakers, who claim compassion for
the poor and underprivileged—refuse to support anything that would give
families a way out of failing public schools. These lawmakers are sorely out of
touch with the people of Texas. I imagine it’s because teacher’s unions are in
touch with their campaign coffers.
One significant education bright spot is HB 3979, by Rep. Toth, requiring that
civics teaching must include the moral, political, and educational foundations
of America. It’s an anti-critical race theory law. And this is great news.
BAN TAXPAYER-FUNDED LOBBYING
This was another failed priority. The Senate passed SB
10, Senator Bettencourt’s bill to ban taxpayer-funded lobbying.
It got sent to House State Affairs Committee, where it was voted favorably out
of committee. But the House floor vote was postponed multiple times and
ultimately did not get a vote. So, unless this is handled in a special session,
we’ll go on paying tax money to have lobbyists go to Austin and lobby our
elected officials to go against our will. The very idea rankles thinking Texans.
EXTRA OPINIONS
Here are some additional opinions on the wind up of the legislative session:
· “Legislative Priorities Report 6.6.21” by Jill
Glover, posted at the RPT website.
· “Did Lawmakers Really ‘Run Out of Time’?” by Jeramy
Kitchen for Texas Scorecard, June 1, 2021.
· “Mediocre 87th Texas Legislature Gavels To Close; Special Session Coming” by admin at The Golden Hammer, Montgomery,
TX, June 1, 2021.
It was brought to my attention that I made an error in the Constitutional Carry section. The bill didn't come out of the House without amendment (although you could say without amendments that affected substance), but there was an insistence that the Senate not amend. In fact, the Harris County Republicans voted for a resolution to push for that--which I stood alone against. I stand by the rest of that section as accurate.
ReplyDeleteRegarding Banning Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying, the bill was substituted completely by State Affairs Chair Chris Paddie. It obliterated the intent by giving attorneys a pass on having to register as a lobbyist and by restricting taxpayer-funded lobbying to only 1 section of code that related to property tax rebates. Chair Paddie, after voting it out of committee, carried the bill he loathed himself, postponed consideration of the bill 4 times--the last time to the original author's birthday in September 2021! Amazing shenanigans!
ReplyDeleteThanks for the added info. I hope we can get this priority in a special session.
DeleteI Gail Stanart was the RPT Legislative Priorities Committee Subcommittee for Banning Taxpayer-Funded Lobbying.
ReplyDelete