With a global pandemic going on, if you’re spending more
time at home than usual and wondering what to do, maybe it’s time to read a book
or two, or ten.
We’re in the middle of this pandemic, so maybe there’s some
literature to enlighten us. I’m avoiding The Hot Zone or I Am Legend
for now. I’m less interested in the fear, looking more at the strategic and moral
questions and how they’ve been handled.
cover image from here |
Last week, I think it was the very day we were directed to
avoid gatherings of ten or more people, I was in the middle of Brandon
Sanderson’s The Hero of Ages, third in the Mistborn Saga. That
series is made up of two trilogies, the first three from an earlier age, and
the second three of a later age—early industrial age, with trains and guns, but
still the semi-magical aspects of the earlier trilogy. I’ve read them all, mostly
out of order. This is the last one for me, the third in the earlier trilogy.
One of the main characters in The Hero of Ages is a
leader named Elend. He’s now the emperor, after the defeat of the Lord Ruler in
the previous book—which ended up setting free an evil force that is wreaking
havoc in their world.
There are a couple of significant oddities in their world:
mist and ash. The dark mist comes out at night. People have been superstitious
about it for centuries, worried it can harm them. But the ones with the special
powers know the mist is safe, just a part of nature. Until now.
Now the mists are starting to kill people. Also, the mists
are coming earlier, before dusk, and staying later, after dawn, encroaching on
the day and shortening the time the sun is out for crops, so the food supply is
threatened. It’s further threatened because of the falling ash, possibly from
some distant volcano. This ash is very black, not a normal ashy gray, and the
growing ashfall has to be shoveled off paths and crops each day, also
threatening the food supply.
So, in this natural disaster, Elend is trying to gather
forces to fight off the evil. I don’t know how all of that is going to go yet.
But he’s moving an army toward a nearby city state that has some particular
resources they will need. The plan is to negotiate if possible, but fight if
necessary.
Meanwhile, the mist is attacking villages, and anyone out
and about. It is like a plague. It doesn’t strike anyone indoors, even inside a
tent such as the soldiers are housed in during their trek. So the soldiers can
safely stay inside until the mist passes. But that is getting later and later
in the day.
The mist seems to arbitrarily attack some and leave others.
And among those attacked, some are killed that very day, while others remain
ill and then recover—leaving some of their cohorts worried that they are cursed
somehow. But once the mist has passed over someone, they’re impervious to any
future mist attack.
Elend realizes that they can’t get into a battle while his
troops are hiding in their tents until the mist passes. They could be attacked
by an army of mist survivors. What he realizes they have to do is purposely expose
themselves. All of them. While they are far enough out from the city to be safe
from attack.
He knows he will lose men. He is calling on them all to risk
their lives: follow his order and probably survive to become inoculated soldiers,
but possibly die. These are healthy men, so he hopes that will be in their
favor. But he thinks long and hard before giving the order.
By the way, an exact 16% die. To the man. Of those attacked
with illness, they remain ill for exactly 16 days. Something weird is going on.
But now they have data to work with.
OK, so that is one approach: mass exposure, acceptable
casualty rate—with the survivors becoming an immune population.
I’m looking at the ways various countries are handling this
Wuhan novel coronavirus known as COVID-19.
Elend’s way looks something like Italy or Iran. His 16% is a
pretty high casualty rate—ours is unknown because exposure is unknown, but will
probably turn out to be more like 1-3%. But we live in an age where wiping out even
one or two of every group of a hundred we participate in looks pretty ugly. Also,
Italy has an older population, which seems to be more susceptible to serious
illness. And serious illnesses require hospital beds, ventilators, and other
resources that aren’t usually required in such high numbers. Italy’s leaders
are making the tough decisions about who gets those resources. And the world
looks on horrified as they decide not to treat people over age 80, but just let
them die.
Korea has been possibly the most successful. To start with,
they knew not to trust the Chinese government. With their first case, they caused “social
distancing,” as we’re doing here. And they tested widely. Anyone who tested
positive was put in absolute quarantine. Having testing resources was a huge
bonus for them, which we are just ramping up to here.
Other countries have been trying other methods. Quarantine
the elderly and immune-system compromised, while others can go about their
lives almost as normal. Denmark is trying this; we’ll get data from them that
can be used in future decision-making. If it works, it’s less financially
devastating than semi-quarantining everyone—or totally quarantining everyone, as China
has had to do. Great Britain was on the Danish path but found casualties too high and
moved toward more general lockdown.
We’ve had a more general lockdown in the US, getting more
and more strict as the virus spreads. The plan here is to lengthen the time
frame for people to get the virus, so that the supply of beds and ventilators
and other resources does not get overwhelmed. To “flatten the curve,” as they
say, based on this graph:
image from here |
People have been spreading a meme that says, “Hey, remember
when everyone rushed to the store to buy toilet paper at the same time and it
ran out before the supply could be restocked and everyone freaked out? Now
imagine the same thing at your local hospital. But instead of TP that’s out, it’s
beds and ventilators. That’s why everything is cancelled. That’s why you should
stay home.”
Another book that came to mind during this crisis is Sinclair
Lewis’s Arrowsmith. It’s about a doctor/researcher. It has been too long
since I last read it, but I remember a couple of things about Martin
Arrowsmith, the main character. He is pretty flawed. He has some idealistic
reasons for researching cures for plague outbreaks. But there is also a lot of
excitement at the chance to take on a real life problem, to have personal
purpose. Arrowsmith wants to find out who he is, and be more than he has been.
And he needs to be better. His wife, Leora, and his mentor, Dr. Gottlieb, give
him support in that quest. Gottlieb describes their world in religious terms:
To be a scientist—it is not just a different job, so that a
man should choose between being a scientist and being an explorer or a
bond-salesman or a physician or a king or a farmer. It is a tangle of very obscure
emotions, like mysticism, or wanting to write poetry; it makes its victim all
different from the good normal man. The normal man, he does not care much what
he does except that he should eat and sleep and make love. But the scientist is
intensely religious—he is so religious that he will not accept quarter-truths,
because they are an insult to his faith (p. 267).
Often Arrowsmith is restless and dissatisfied. Then comes
the excitement of a real outbreak in the West Indies. Bacillus pestis
among rats, spreading to people, thought at first to be just a flu. He has the
opportunity to experiment. And the ethical dilemma of experimenting on people.
But he goes. And he makes what he thinks is likely to be a cure. Tragedy
strikes. And guilt. And resolve. Go ahead and read it.
The book, from a century ago, is way behind the science of
today. But it’s probably still worth reading, because it’s more about the life
inside this man’s mind than it is about science (although a scientist did help
Lewis with the writing of it).
I watched a video a couple of weeks ago, on body language,
looking at a CNN interview with Dr. Robert Redfield, head of the CDC. Mandy,
the bombardsbodylanguage.com commentator/instructor, points out how his face
lights up, and he smiles, talking about what we would normally consider bad
news. But this man is a scientist, with responsibility over outbreaks such as
this. His work has suddenly gotten very exciting. He’s not thinking about the
mass casualties or economic disasters about to befall us; he’s thinking about what
energizes him: the opportunity for new and exciting discovery. This might not
seem like a normal human response, but it is normal for a type of person who
does a specific type of work—and we need people who do that work.
CDC Director Dr. Robert Redfield screenshot from here |
There are actual people out there, doing research, working
for a response to this virus as fast as they can. Just this morning Glenn Beck interviewed a man named Gregory Rigano, Stanford Advisor to SPARK, and Project Lead
for Clinical Trials for COVID-19 prevention, who was reporting that two drugs—I think working together, but both
are also being studied separately—anyway, these drugs have been shown to cure
the disease 100% of the time in six days. He referred to an immunologist from
France, so I think that’s where this combination has been tried. He’s was
asking for healthcare professionals to join in the open-data clinical trial.
He hoped that within a couple of months, the treatment could
be widespread. He still calls for social distancing, so we don’t overwhelm the available
resources. But these drugs may give us time for other remedies and possibly vaccines
to be developed in a year or two—without the world economy having to shut down until
then.
The drugs he mentioned are generics that have been around
for several decades. One is hydroxychloroquine, which was developed shortly
after WWII for treating malaria, and has also been used to treat rheumatoid
arthritis. The other is azithromycin, the antibiotic often referred to as Zithromax,
or in its package called a Z-pak. The FDA has already approved these drugs;
they just have to approve them for this off-label use.
Later today President Trump held a press conference
announcing the FDA’s allowing for hydroxychloroquine and a couple of other
drugs (I didn’t catch all the names, but azithromycin wasn’t among them, so
there are additional ones) to be used for the off-label purpose of treating
COVID-19. This is a very hopeful development.
The FDA Commissioner, speaking alongside the President, said
that, when he was a cancer doctor and researcher, he knew how important it was to
offer a patient hope. Not false hope, but real hope. He believes the announcement
today, along with other efforts to combat this illness, offers real hope. I
think he’s right. I’m much more hopeful today than I was even yesterday.
We live in interesting times. My Utah friends and family
lived through an earthquake, and its aftershocks, yesterday morning. One meme
started referring to all that’s been going on as “apocalypse bingo,” and the
card is filling up.
Our literary friend Gandalf had this conversation with Frodo
over such times:
“I wish it need not have happened in my
time,” said Frodo.
“So do I,” said Gandalf, “and so do all who live to see such
times. But that is not for them to decide. All we have to decide is what to do
with the time that is given us.” —J.R.R. Tolkien, The Fellowship of the Ring
No comments:
Post a Comment