How would it be if we lived in a place, a culture, where people
live peaceably among their neighbors, helping rather than taking advantage of
one another, abiding by laws enacted to protect property and safety—with
honesty and honor? Where people live in peace with other people; countries and
cultures coexist in appreciation, without fear? Where there’s a thriving economy,
where poverty is meaningless; even though there will always be a lowest earning
10% defined as poor, these lowest earners have comfortable shelter and adequate
food and clothing—and there’s the possibility of rising, or at least for future
generations to rise?
How would that be? Good? That’s what we call Civilization,
here at the Spherical Model. I’ve been describing Civilization and how to get
there for a while. And I’m on the lookout for ways of explaining it—or other
people who are explaining it too, in their ways.
I’ve been listening to enough Jordan Peterson lectures lately to feel like I’m actually one of his students. [I wrote about him here and here.] And I’ve been collecting a few things that connect with my purpose here of
bringing us northward on the sphere toward freedom, prosperity, and
civilization.
He has a book—12 Rulesfor Life: An Antidote to Chaos—which I think I’ll have to go ahead
and read, since it’s reportedly not the same as what is in his various lectures
and interviews. But there’s a chapter in the book, Rule 6, which he says is: "Set your house in
perfect order before you criticize the world."
Dr. Jordan Peterson with Patrick Coffin screen shot from the interview |
Dr. Peterson waxes philosophical, often. And it’s hard to
distill down for brief reference here. But, in an interview with Patrick Coffin,
he starts with the idea that good
and evil exist. In reference to PTSD patients, he says:
If you have PTSD, it’s because you’ve been touched by
malevolence in one way or another. You need to reorganize your thinking along
lines that are fundamentally religious. You need to start seeing the world as a
battleground between good and evil—which is
what it is, in the most real sense.
So, as a clinical psychologist, he says, in order to heal
from a particular disorder, you need a religious viewpoint. I’ve been saying,
in order to have a civilized society, you need to have a religious people. No
one gets forced, but civilization requires a critical mass of people who live
the rules required for civilization. There are answers that have to do with
choosing right over wrong.
image from here |
There’s another speech, in The Netherlands, where Dr. Peterson is referring in a way
to immigration issues, but he spends a lot of time building a framework about
two things: fair play and truth. In the fair play section, he talks about a study
of rat behavior, where the rats learn that, in order to keep being able to
play, you need to play fair—abide by the rules—so that others will want to
continue to play with you. Even rats know that.
And then he deals with the truth section, which I’ll cover a
little more in a minute. But he has this conclusion:
Now, I didn’t know what to say about immigration when I
decided to do this talk, but I don’t think it matters, because there are many
complex things that can be said about immigration and many of the problems that
face us.
But there’s a meta-question, which is not, How do you solve a difficult question? But, How do you solve
the set of all possible difficult questions? And the answer to that is quite
straightforward: Speak the truth, and play fair. And that works.
And so I’ve been communicating that as diligently as I can
for the last three decades, predicated on my observation that we got some
things right, that we should do better with it even. And that, if we
transformed ourselves, each and every one, into better people, predicated on
the observation of that core identity, that we would then become collectively
the sort of people who could probably solve any problem that was put to them,
no matter what its magnitude.
In civilization, the smallest social unit is the family. You
get a good family by being good individuals working together. So you can see it
happen on that small level. As I say in the Civilization section of the Spherical
Model,
As long as families are allowed to live among themselves
(children are under the care of their own parents), it is possible to have a
civilized society that is just one family in size. Then, if that family can
find additional similarly civilized families to associate with, their society
grows. If it could grow to the size of a village or township, all the better.
So you start with yourself, and then your family. And, as
more people do that, society is transformed in remarkably positive ways—and become
able to solve, eventually, any problem.
In the Patrick Coffin interview, Dr. Peterson says this need
to change is actually an optimistic thing. He begins by laying out the story
from Genesis of Cain killing his brother Abel. He makes the case, first, for
Cain’s line of reasoning:
Being [the way things are in this world] is tragic, being is touched by
malevolence. It’s, Why not develop resentment and hatred for it and do
everything to extract revenge? Revenge against God, because that’s really what
it is— It’s like that in the Cain and Abel story. In fact, it’s exactly like
that. And the answer is something like, That’s cowardly. Something like that.
And the other answer is, All that does is make everything that you’re
hypothetically objecting to worse.
And so, if you take the immoral stance and say, Well, the
horror of the world has made me bitter, resentful, murderous, and genocidal;
isn’t it no wonder? Well, you can’t logically conclude that you should act in
the way that is certain to do nothing but multiply that beyond comprehension.
And so, there’s a call to truth in there, and responsibility,
as an antidote to resentment.
He adds, “It’s also an optimistic viewpoint, because, maybe
you can change yourself. It is
possible. Maybe that will work.”
How do you do it? What is it you actually need to do in
order to change yourself, to do the moral thing? He says, “Stop doing things
that you know to be wrong. That’s a good start.” He has been challenging people
to do a 30-day challenge, to not say anything for a month that you believe to
be untrue. Just do it, as an experiment, and see what happens.
And here’s the philosophical underpinning of the experiment:
So there’s this idea; there’s a deep Christian idea—and it’s
deeper than Christianity even—but it’s a deep Christian idea. But, the being that is brought into being by
truthful speech is good. It’s like the moral of the first few chapters of
Genesis, right? If you use the Logos to bring order into being, that’s truthful
speech—then the being that emerges is
good. It’s like, that’s a hypothesis. Maybe it’s true. Maybe if we told the
truth and induct the good, then being
would transform itself around us into something increasingly less tragic and
certainly less malevolent.
There’s more about that truth telling, going back to The
Netherlands speech:
The Logos is the deepest idea of the West. And it means
something like: clear, competent, truthful, communicative endeavor.
So there’s an idea in Genesis that that’s the spirit that God
used to bring forth order from chaos at the beginning of time. When God
employed the Logos to extract order out of chaos, He extracted habitable order
and then pronounced that it was good.
And, at the same time, when God made human beings, He
pronounced them made in the image of God, which means that human beings have
the capacity—that Logos-like capacity—to speak habitable order into being out
of chaotic potential.
And the deep idea is that, if you do that truthfully, then
what you bring forth is good.
What is it a society needs, in order to become a civilization?
Religious people (bringing non-religious people along with them) who honor God,family, life, property, and truth. That’s a condensation of the Ten Commandments. Dr. Peterson simplifies it even
further into “speak the truth and play fair.”
Or, we could say, Always do the right thing. Always knowing
what the right thing is might be a challenge for most of us mortals. But there
is an ultimate Good, and the source is God. Otherwise it’s all opinion. But we
know, if we train ourselves to tell the truth—especially to ourselves—and then
we act in the best way we know, even when it’s hard, that is going to be good
enough to transform society, as he says, “into something increasingly less
tragic and certainly less malevolent.”
It’s worth trying.
No comments:
Post a Comment