The propaganda beast is weakening in its ability to create the illusion of power for the sea beast.
If that sounds cryptic to you, we’re looking at the beasts of Revelation 13 as either symbols or pretty accurate metaphors for what we’re
seeing. In short, the beast coming up out of the sea, or sea beast, is what we
also call the worldwide cabal, the whore of all the earth, the great and
abominable church, the deep state, secret combinations, or simply evil
corruption for power. This beast is controlled by the dragon—Satan—which means
it is powered by evil and has evil intent.
The second beast, on the land, is a false-speaking beast, and it is also controlled by the dragon. It supports or creates the illusion of power for the sea beast. I call this land beast the propaganda beast. It is made up of news media, entertainment media, academia, government and business entities—all of which create a narrative, or image, that supports the power elite.
from the Dürer Apocalypse woodcut "The Beast with the Lamb's Horns and the Beast with Seven Heads," this segment found here |
With that brief primer behind us, what I think we’re seeing is both the weakening of the sea beast (which I wrote about here) and the weakening of the propaganda beast to make us think the power elite still have power.
I’m observing what I’m seeing now, not predicting what will
happen next week or next month or year. I think we’re seeing something like an
illusion show, a magician, whose props fail and suddenly the trick is revealed to
the audience. The people no longer believe what the magician was tricking them
into believing. In a magic show, being fooled—and figuring it out—are both part
of the fun. But in real life, when we didn’t consent to the deception, we’re
just being lied to. And it’s a good thing to recognize the deception and awaken
to the truth.
So, what am I seeing? A lot of what other people are seeing
as well. Mainly this is about the news media, which has enjoyed some decades of
control over what we the people believe. Until the internet. Now there are
other voices we can go to.
The Broken
Shards Piece
There was an Axios piece this week, trying to describe
what’s happening, albeit from their view as one of the narrative controllers.
In “Behind the Curtain: The big media era is over” by Jim VandeHei and Mike Allen, October
28, 2024, the authors describe a broken shards scenario: our news sources used to be
solid glass panes that we all saw fairly equally. Now there are a multitude of
diverse “shards,” and we all get a different combination of sources. They explain:
The big picture: When we speak around the country, we
often tell audiences that when you're sitting at a table of people of different
ages and politics, several of them probably get their information on platforms
you've never visited ... from popular influencers you've never heard of ... on
topics that might seem exotic or totally new.
They’re looking mainly at how this affects the presidential
campaigns:
Former President Trump reached way more potential male voters
with his three-hour Rogan conversation (33 million views over the weekend) than
he could have with a dozen or more appearances on Fox News, CNN and MSNBC
combined. All three cable news networks skew very old in viewership, with
median ages ranging from 67 to 70.
They give a list of podcasts, etc., that Kamala Harris has
gone to, and that I literally have not heard of:
·
A Nueva Network radio interview with Stephanie “Chiquibaby”
Himonidis aimed at a young Latino demographic.
·
“All the Smoke” NBA-focused podcast aimed at
young Black men.
·
“The Shade Room” culture podcast aimed at young Black
women.
· “Club Shay-Shay” podcast with NFL player Shannon Sharpe, aimed, I assume at Black men.
There was also the "Who's Your Daddy" podcast, an explicit sex discussion, which Kamala deemed important while Hurricane victims in North Carolina were without power or without homes. I hadn't heard of this before she did it, but I had heard of it before reading the Axios piece.
There’s a list of some more obscure places Trump has been as
well, also many of which I had previously been unaware of, but as well as many I’ve
long known. A difference the article might have noted but didn’t was that Trump’s
schedule has been packed, and has included many larger rallies, and he talks at
each of these as a real, authentic person. Meanwhile, most of Kamala’s
scheduled days (which are publicly accessible) show her taking days to prepare
for each one. She keeps them brief. She says essentially the same things over
and over, often claiming things that are provable lies. Her campaign is
counting on these people seeing only news that is curated with the power elite’s
narrative.
Her brief attempt at “crossing the aisle” with Fox News’ Bret Baier did not go well for her. She failed to answer direct questions that should have been the “of course” anticipated questions. She circled around. And this was after arriving late for the interview and then cutting it short—which we now also know about her and her handlers. Trump has been willing to talk with people of opposing views, as long as it’s a real conversation and not an attack pile-on. So he has actually reached more people who didn’t previously know him except the way the propaganda beast had labeled him.
After the Harris campaign called all the attendees at the MSG event racist Nazis, someone showed yet another Babylon Bee satire that becomes actual news, this one from July. |
Axios is also wrong to call Joe Rogan right-wing. He had
never been anything of the sort—until he told his actual personal experience
with Ivermectin after having COVID, and got cancelled. Which led to the rise of
Rumble (a non-censoring platform), where Rogan’s viewership far eclipses the
network news sources put together. People who watched Rogan’s interview with
Trump—for three hours—saw that Trump was personable, interesting, well-versed
on many topics, interested in the person he was talking with, and by extension
interested in a whole lot of regular Americans. And he is clearly not Hitler.
My favorite line—this was in reference to environmental damage caused by offshore windmills—was, “I’d like to be a whale psychiatrist.” The Rogan interview with VP candidate J. D. Vance is out, and I’m interested in watching it later today. Vance, by the way, has been a force in taking on the media. He has the facts at the ready, remains unruffled, and does it with aplomb. This belies the “he’s weird, mean, and angry” depiction of him proffered by the propaganda beast.
The meme was shared on the Viva & Barnes Sunday livestream October 27, 2024 |
Back to that article. Here’s how you know Axios isn’t about
truth. They say:
Threat level: When attention is scattered across
scores of shards, it’s easier to propagate conspiracy theories and manipulate “news.”
It’s way harder to catch Russian misinformation campaigns when they are
unleashed inside a dozen different information bubbles.
What they mean is, it’s much easier to manipulate “news”
when you control the whole pane of glass than when you can’t control all those
shards. And, by the way, while Russia is willing to put out disinformation on a
whim, their efforts have not been a force in our elections. But there are
supposed Russian misinformation campaigns that have:
· Trump colluded with Russia—an invention of the Hillary Clinton campaign and the DNC, for which they were fined but were otherwise not held accountable. Based on this invention, they spied on Trump before and after he was in the White House. The media elites went along with it, and Axios apparently still wants to push it as true.
·
Hunter Biden laptop—claimed by 51 former intelligence
officers to have had all the hallmarks of Russian disinformation, even though
at the time the FBI had it in their possession and had already authenticated
it. Information was censored from social media platforms. Accurate information
about this could have meant a 17% swing in the election away from Biden.
Axios predicts that the outcome of the election could slow the movement toward broken up media if Harris wins: “she and her staff are much closer—and responsive—to traditional
media.” But if Trump wins, the shift toward more “shards” will accelerate.
The Doom Loop of Distrust in Media
There was an opinion piece in Bloomberg a week ago talking about the distrust of institutions in general, and the media
in particular. Alas, if only we could go back to the days of Walter Cronkite,
when he would said, “And that’s the way it is,” and people believed it really was—even
when it was not.
This same week Jeff Bezos, owner of the Washington Post, put out a piece explaining (?) why
his WaPo decided not to endorse in elections, starting suddenly now—as part of an effort to
bring back trust in media, to make it appear less biased. Here’s something
accurate from his piece:
In the annual public surveys about trust and reputation,
journalists and the media have regularly fallen near the very bottom, often
just above Congress. But in this year’s Gallup poll, we have managed to fall
below Congress. Our profession is now the least trusted of all. Something we
are doing is clearly not working.
What is not working is feeding us propaganda and trying to
get us to believe it as fact. Bezos uses the analogy of an election:
Voting machines must meet two requirements. They must count
the vote accurately, and people must believe they count the vote accurately.
The second requirement is distinct from and just as important as the first.
Likewise with newspapers. We must be accurate, and we must be believed to be accurate. It’s a bitter pill to swallow, but we are failing on the second requirement.
You know how not to get people to believe your machines
count accurately? Let them be connected to the internet when that is illegal.
Have counting stop because of “leaking pipes in the building” and then have a
sudden inexplicable jump in numbers for one particular side. Refuse to allow
observation during the counting. Change rules at the last minute, always in favor of less security. Refuse to
allow forensic examination of ballots. Refuse to do signature verification. OK,
we could go on and on with that; they tried them all in 2020, and mostly got
away with them. What you need to be believed is to follow strict rules, be
totally transparent, and have people from opposing sides observe at every step.
What doesn’t work is telling people they’re election deniers when they call out
your errors and your obfuscation.
That goes as well for the media. If they had a long record
of being accurate, they would be believed. They’re failing on the first requirement,
and that’s why they’re failing on the second. It seems obvious.
In reaction to both these three pieces in Axios, Bloomberg,
and WaPo, the Badlands News Brief (a somewhat Q-related group of writers—this one by
Burning Bright—reacting to things in the news) offered this (highlights are
mine):
Our Take: The picture
would be worth a thousand words, but Amazon owner and self-described elite Jeff
Bezos did us one better, and actually WROTE 1,000 words to defend his decision
to NOT interfere in an election.
This comes on the heels of Op eds that have been flooding the
Info War over the course of the last week, wherein the screeching communist
harpies that have decreed themselves official narrative-setters for the entire
country realize with mounting dread and panic that they've lost complete
control of the story, which, as I have been saying for over two years, IS
the war.
Bloomberg actually referred to the media death spiral as a
"doom loop," while Axios put it so directly in their own panic piece,
it could have been written by an Anon: "the mainstream media's dominance
in narrative and reality-shaping in presidential elections shattered in
2024."
Now, we have Bezos being swarmed by the very communist worker
bees he once lorded over.
In Game Theory, chaos begets control.
Enjoy it. — Burning Bright
I came upon this podcast yesterday (literally hadn’t heard
of it before, although she’s conservative and has been around for a while). I
think it was linked in an email. Tracy Beanz, for UncoverDC, is responding to the Jeff Bezos op-ed. When Bezos says, “Something we are doing
is clearly not working,” Beanz responds,
Yes. Let me tell you what it is. You’re lying to people, continuously,
over and over again, every single day. And people, given that they have ways to
get information now that are not you, are figuring it out. They don’t want to
be propagandized anymore. They don’t want to be spoken down to anymore. They
want the truth of what’s going on in the world around them so that they can
make informed decisions.
What you’re doing wrong is that you became a fifth branch of
the intelligence community for the United States government, and it’s the intelligence
community that has been weaponized against the people of America in favor of, I
guess you could call it, a globalized campaign to destabilize this country from
within. And you, unbeknownst to you or not—and I cannot imagine how you couldn’t
realize it, unless you were that retarded (excuse my French)—have just gone
along with it hook, line, and sinker. And for a long while it worked. It
stopped working at around 2015. And the snowball has just continued to roll
down that hill since then.
She’s right about the lying. Is her assessment of the media
being an intelligence arm of the US government? I’m not sure that’s how I would
word it—intelligence arm. It is definitely a propaganda tool of the US
government—or more precisely, of the global elite cabal that currently runs the
US government: the sea beast.
It caught my attention that she says this all stopped working around 2015. She may be right. I had been thinking 2020, when the COVID shenanigans, on top of the election shenanigans, were just too obvious to ignore. But maybe it was even earlier, once we all got on the Internet.
Anyway, there’s more evidence of the doom loop underway.
The Times
and Tucker
A week before the election, Tucker Carlson (among others)
received an inquiry from the New York Times, essentially asking him to
be shamed into admitting he is at fault for not agreeing with the propaganda
beast’s narrative. I got this from Tom Woods’s daily email, which even improves
upon Tucker’s response, so I’ve included his before and after comments.
Tom Woods: Evidently a number of right-of-center influencers,
including Tucker Carlson, just received a very similar ominous note from the New
York Times.
I want to share that note, along with Carlson’s response, because it is an important lesson in how an institution like the Times is to be handled.
Tom Woods: So a week before the election, the Times is
colluding with the crazies at Media Matters to try to shut down
dissident voices.
Carlson's response was exactly right. Do not engage with
these people as if they are acting in good faith, or in the hope that if you're
reasonable and forthcoming, they have to treat you fairly. They don't have to
do anything.
More people are going to see Carlson's response than will see
the New York Times hit piece. (This is why they hate the Internet.)
Indeed, they hate the internet; it is so hard to control all
of us with our varied voices and opinions. And they prefer control.
Almost daily, Dan Bongino says (I’m paraphrasing), “No
matter how much you hate the media, you don’t hate them enough.” Hate is a
strong word—for individual people. It is not too strong a word to use for the propaganda
beast—an entity made up of many weak humans unwilling to stand for truth, but
willing to lie for power, prestige, influence, or something else the dragon
knows is their weakness.
Other Signals
As the Axios piece points out, there’s an election the media
is focused on. What an inconvenient time for the media not to have the force it
used to have. Granted, there’s not much for them to work with. The whole “Trump
is Hitler” thing just isn’t working—because, as you might surmise by now, the
media is lying about that along with everything else they lie about.
In fact, they’re so predictable at their lies, that the Babylon Bee made it a meme back in July (see above).
This doesn’t stop them from doubling down on what’s not
working.
And for some reason the media elites can’t seem to grasp, people don’t like being called racists and Nazis (all 100,000 New Yorkers who were inside and outside of the Madison Square Garden Trump rally), deplorables (that was Hillary, shortly before she lost), and garbage (Biden this week about all Trump supporters).
One of the tools bringing down this propaganda beast has been mocking and meme-smithing. The Babylon Bee could be considered cultural heroes. But there are many unsung warriors. They took what were intended to be campaign-killing moments and turned them into inspiring images.
There was the iconic mugshot—representing Trump as the target to keep them from getting to the rest of us. There was the iconic “Fight! Fight! Fight!” right after Trump was shot, when they only grazed his ear, instead of leaving us without a candidate (their wish; whether it was planned with the assassin or not). Then came that happy few minutes of Trump working at McDonald’s, mocking Kamala for claiming she had worked there as a teen, although there’s no evidence she ever did. Then, after Biden called all of us “garbage,” Trump showed up as a garbage collector. Separately, any these makes a pretty iconic meme. Together, they show the power of images—something the opposition just can’t seem to muster this season.
collage found on Tom Glass's Facebook |
"A campaign is snapshots and soundbites"—another Dan Bongino quote.
The Harris/Walz campaign has the full power of the propaganda beast at their disposal. But they can’t manage anything but humiliating snapshots and soundbites. The Trump team occasionally just takes clips of Kamala speaking, without editing, and adds simply, “I’m Donald Trump, and I approve this message.” The more we hear her, the less likely we are to vote for her.
Meanwhile, Trump and Vance come up
with more positive snapshots and soundbites every day.
There’s some delight in seeing the
“doom loop,” or death spiral, of the propaganda beast—it’s failure to create the illusion of
power for the evil cabal—timed for this point in history, just before the election.
After years of feeling oppressed, this feels hopeful.
That doesn’t mean I can predict
the election outcome. My sense is that Trump could win, and maybe win big. But
the evil cabal will cheat. We must win so big—and so widespread
across the electoral college map—that they can’t cover the gap.
And then, what about when they
protest, possibly even violently, against us “garbage” patriots? I don’t know.
But, if I’m right and the propaganda beast is losing its power, then it will no
longer be able to create the illusion that the sea beast (evil cabal) has
power. Babylon falls in an our (Revelation 18:10, 17, 19). That’s how the story goes in Revelation. Those
beasts are defeated. After all we can do, Christ the King—whom Kamala blithely
declared not welcome at her rally last week; you should look for Him at the
Trump rally—yes, Jesus Christ the Redeemer comes in and fights our battles.
That’s how the story ends. I do
not know for certain where we are in the story. I only know that the sea beast
may be beyond its reign over us, and it looks like that
supporting propaganda beast is losing its voice. That may make them seem more fierce, temporarily. We shall see. We live in interesting times.