Evidence of Voter Fraud Is Mounting

Things keep moving along—in the background, with silence from the corrupt media.

We now have North Carolina, 15 electoral votes, and Alaska, 3 electoral votes, concluding their vote counts, both in favor of President Trump, so he has gained 18 electoral votes since Monday.

Graphic as of November 12, 2020 from EveryLegalVote.com

According to the tally at EveryLegalVote.com, as of today, the current count is 234 electoral votes for Trump, 214 for Biden, with 80 still disputed. This tally shows Virginia in dispute; if I understand correctly, the dispute is for other than the presidential race, but there is a recount being requested. The Epoch Times shows Virginia as decided for Biden. That would mean adding 13 to Biden, putting him at 227, still behind President Trump.

Image from here

In the past couple of days, lawsuits have been filed in Pennsylvania and Michigan, and we’ll go over some of what those entail. Be aware that lawyers could be disbarred if they bring forth a frivolous lawsuit during such a moment in history. They have to vet every person who contacts them, to verify that they have knowledge that can be used—that they have firsthand knowledge, or at least hearsay knowledge that corroborates other evidence. These are serious people doing serious work at great risk to their reputations and livelihood.

On Tuesday, Kayleigh McEnany held a presser laying out some of the charges in the lawsuits, along with experts on the cases in Pennsylvania and Michigan. We’ll cover that presser first.

Also Tuesday, David Frei, Canadian law vlogger of the Viva Frei Vlawg, went through the lawsuit filing in Michigan to help us understand the law—which is his purpose. He’s pretty much non-political and has no personal stake in our election. But I do see a very strong bias toward law and order in him.

Following that, there’s some some other news of the day.

All of this contradicts the media claim that “there’s no evidence of voter fraud.”

 

Trump Campaign Presser 

Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany at Tuesday's Press Conference
screenshot from here

Kayleigh McEnany starts with some observations about what we’re seeing—that the simple solution would have been transparency. Where that’s lacking, it’s probably because there’s something to hide:

There is only one party in America that opposes voter ID, citizenship, residency, eligibility. There is only one party in America trying to keep observers out of the count room. And that party, my friends, is the Democrat Party. You don’t take these positions because you want an honest election. You don’t oppose an audit of the vote because you want an accurate count. You don’t oppose our efforts at sunlight and transparency because you have nothing to hide. You take these positions because you are welcoming fraud, and you are welcoming illegal voting

She quotes Justice Neil Gorsuch twice, from his opinion in Democrat National Committee v. Wisconsin State Legislature: 

“Our oath to uphold the Constitution is tested by hard times, not easy ones. Last minute changes to long-standing election rules risk other problems too, inviting confusion and chaos, and eroding public confidence in electoral outcomes.”

And,

“Nothing in our founding document contemplates the kind of judicial intervention that took place here. Nor is there precedent for it in 230 years of the Court’s decisions.”… “No one doubts that conducting a national election amid a pandemic poses serious challenges. But none of that means individual judges may improvise with their own election rules in place of those the people’s representatives have adopted.”

Attorney Matt Morgan in Tuesday presser
screenshot from here

She turned time over to Matt Morgan, an attorney for the campaign. Adding to the charge that the elections official and Pennsylvania Supreme Court had illegally taken upon themselves the legislative duty of setting election law, he summarized, putting the irregularities in two categories:

1.       A violation of equal access based on a lack of meaningful observation and transparency, particularly in Democrat-controlled counties.

2.       A violation of equal protection based on disparate treatment between Republican voters and Democrat voters.

Morgan gave some specifics about the disparate treatment. And then, about the refusal to allow observers, he said,

In Philadelphia and Allegheny Counties, there were over 682,000 ballots that were tabulated outside the view of our observers who were entitled by law to review those ballots. And we believe that a meaningful review of those ballots could discern that there were ballots that were illegally counted.

They are asking for meaningful review in order to discern, within those 682,000 at least, and possibly more throughout the state, whether those ballots were treated differently depending on party and location in the state.

Will this review make a difference? Yes. Review of only those ballots is likely to identify enough votes to put the state into the margin requiring automatic recount. This lawsuit, he said, could swing that discrepancy.

So this Pennsylvania lawsuit isn’t the last step in finding an accurate count for the state; it is a first step—the step right after setting aside ballots at issue because of their late arrival,  against the law before the election official put in the fix without input from the legislature.

Then time went to Ronna McDaniel, Republican National Committee Chair, who talked mainly about the Michigan lawsuit, which is her home state. She started by mentioning Wayne County, where

Republican poll watchers were denied their legal right to monitor the election and purposely kept in the dark. But, literally and figuratively, poll watcher—or poll election workers—blocked windows and had locked doors. Obviously that’s not going to instill confidence.

Then she listed that thousands of poll watchers have reported being intimidated and prevented from doing their job. So far they have 131 affidavits—signed statements under penalty of perjury—in Michigan, entailing over 2800 incident reports so far. She described the process.

RNC Chair Ronna McDaniel at presser
screenshot from here

As you guys can understand, with 2800 incident reports, this is a lot to track down. It means we’re interviewing these people, we’re getting their statements, and we’re turning them into affidavits. But that takes a lot of time and effort. And, as Matt has mentioned, there’s a canvass process and a certification for a reason.

But I will just tell you, the distress that I’m hearing in my state from people who were at TCF, and the way they were treated, is deeply alarming. I hope you go and look at this. I hope you look at these affidavits, and I hope you hear from the people that were there, who feel like they were denied transparency and saw wrongdoing in Detroit. We should all be alarmed by this, no matter where you are on the political spectrum.

Here’s where she calls out both the Democrats and the media:

So just after a week after the polls closed, Democrats and the media want to ignore these clear irregularities and rush to call states as won, and end the certification and canvass process. We’re hearing we need to unite; we need to come together. Well, for the thousands of people who spent time and hours going out to be part of this process, who feel disenfranchised, who don’t feel like there was transparency, we can’t do that unless we search out all these irregularities.

Even one instance—even one instance—of voter fraud should be too many for all of us. We intend to ensure that every lawful voter has their vote counted in accordance with the law, that observers are granted the access they are due under state law, and that any irregularities that have occurred, whether by malicious intent or incompetence, are investigated to the fullest extent allowed under the law.

She said that, on Tuesday, two new lawsuits were filed, by a Detroit city worker and a whistleblower. I think we’ll let Viva Frei cover those details. But first I want to share McEnany’s final mic drop. After all that about affidavits and votes counted without allowing observation, and challenged votes being thrown back into the regular piles, the press asks their mantra question:

Do you have any evidence you can show us today that shows illegal votes were counted?

McEnany says,

Let me say one final thing. There were 682,479 counted in Philadelphia, in Allegheny County, that there were no poll watchers allowed to watch. It’s the job of the media to ask the question why. Because all we are asking for is truth, transparency, and sunlight, here. That is all we are asking for. And, sadly, we are asking the questions many of you should.

 

Viva Frei Vlawg on Michigan Lawsuit 

David Frei of Viva Frei Vlawg. Yes, he films in his car.
(The T-shirt reads "Politics Ruins Everything.")
screenshot from here

Frei starts with this description of the overall situation:

I think in 20 years’ time, we are all going to remember the 2020 elections. But, as of today, November 10, 2020, the only thing people are talking about is the US presidential elections… and the fact that the outcome is so hotly contested. On the one hand you have roughly half of America saying, “Something smells a little fishy here.” And on the other hand, you have the other half of America, with the support of the mainstream media saying, “Nothing to see here. Everything was good. Let’s transition into a Biden presidency.”

On the one hand, you have the mainstream media saying, “There is no evidence of any fraud.” On the other hand, you have the mainstream media saying, “There isn't any widespread fraud.” On the other hand, you have the mainstream media saying, “Where they find glitches, they have reversed them.” [background graphic, “yes, that is 3 hands”]

It is something of a moving target, but the underlying sentiment, and the underlying mantra of the mainstream media is that there is no evidence of fraud.

Much of the vlog covers reading portions of the actual lawsuit, which you can read here. 

Spoiler alert. He says,

And I’ve got to tell you, after reading the Michigan lawsuit, I don’t think anybody can credibly say that the accusations and the allegations are not themselves credible.

Here’s some of what’s in it. Numerous instances of fraud (starting 3a on page 3; some rewording for brevity):

a.       Ballots were processed when voters did not appear in the Qualified Voter File (were not legally registered voters).

b.       Defendants instructed election workers to not verify signatures on absentee ballots, to backdate absentee ballots, and to process such ballots regardless of their validity.

c.       After announcement that all ballots had been received, another batch of unsecured and unsealed ballots, without envelopes, arrived in trays at the TCF Center. There were tens of thousands of these absentee ballots, and apparently every ballot was counted and attributed only to Democratic candidates.

d.       Election workers were instructed to process ballots that appeared after the election deadline and to falsely report that those ballots had been received prior to November 3, 2020 deadline.

e.       Defendants systematically used false information to process ballots. Many, for example, were assigned the birthdate of 1/1/1900.

f.        Election workers campaigned and coached voters to vote for Biden and Democrats.

g.       Unsecured ballots were accepted and added to be counted.

h.       Defendant election officials and workers refused to record challenges to their processes and removed challengers from the site if they politely voiced a challenge.

i.         Following challenges, poll watchers were ejected from the room and prevented from watching.

j.         Defendants permitted thousands of ballots to be filled out by hand and duplicated on site without oversight from poll challengers.

Frei points out that evidence isn’t accepted as fact, or even evidence, until a judge accepts it as such. But he also says,

All of these allegations are supported by seven sworn affidavits with firsthand knowledge of that which they include in their affidavits. There may be, and in fact is, some hearsay in their affidavits, but at the very least sworn affidavits are firsthand knowledge of what they were told and what they in fact did.

Frei adds this,

Bear in mind that exhibit B is a sworn affidavit from the employee of the city, an employee who had been working for the City of Detroit for decades. That is not to say that it is infallible proven fact. That is only to say that someone with a lot to lose is saying something under penalty of perjury, and it is a very serious allegation of firsthand knowledge.

Some of the allegations refer to actual fraud—very serious charges. Some refer to irregularities that imply possibilities of fraud. Frei acknowledges this span and suggests an audit could go a long way toward resolving any questions of legitimacy of the election.

Here are the listed charges:

·         Forging ballots on the Qualified Voter List (numbers 14-30, pp. 5-8)

·         Illegal Voter Coaching and Identification Issues (numbers 31-32, pp. 8-9)

·         Changing Dates on Ballots (numbers 33-34, p. 9)

·         Illegal Double Voting (number 35-37, p. 9)

·         Two Rounds of New Ballots (numbers 38-49, pp. 10-11)

·         Denied Access to Observers (numbers 50-51, p. 11)

·         Inputting Voter Names in the QVF after Voting (numbers 52-55, pp. 11-12)

·         Absentee Ballot Signatures not used for validation as required by law (numbers 56-59, p. 12)

·         Unsecured Ballots (numbers 60-62, p. 12)

Then come the list of laws that were alleged to be violated, which I’ll let you go through for your reading pleasure. (Again, that's here.)

What’s presented in the lawsuit is pretty damning. Nevertheless, it’s still early in the process. Frei ends with this:

It may never be able to be proved in a court of law. The affidavits might be “full of malarkey,” to use someone’s expression. Come to your own conclusions. At least now you have a better idea of the facts to do so.

At the very least, the next time you hear a media person asking, “Do you have any evidence that shows illegal votes were counted?” you’ll know they’re in denial. There’s plenty. And, by the way, Joe Biden is not president-elect. He is, at this point, just a guy who ran for president and is waiting for a vote count on that. Anyone describing him otherwise will need to be held responsible for the cognitive dissonance people face when all of this fraud inevitably comes to light.

Will the recounts be enough? Because the fraud is in enough places, I think so. Some of it depends on judges, who are human beings and, despite their oath, tend to be political. But fair-minded individuals can see the evidence and weigh it for themselves. For me, it weighs a whole lot heavier than the call for unity from the people who have called us Hitler, deplorables, racists, etc., and have been compiling lists of our names in order to punish us for our views the moment they sense they have the power to do it.

It’s not a time to give in, to make nice to get along. If the corruption is not rooted out at this moment in history, we will never have a “next time” free and fair election to vote it out.

 

More to Read

Here are some additional stories I’ve read since my last post.

·         “Georgia Will 'Audit, Recount, and Recanvass' Presidential Vote” by Megan Fox at PJ Media, Nov. 11, 2020. 

Georgia SOS announces full hand recount and audit
screenshot from here

·         “Tens of Thousands of Pennsylvania Ballots Returned Earlier Than Sent Date” by Petr Svab for The Epoch Times, Nov. 10, 2020. 

·         “Sidney Powell: 450,000 ballots voted only for Biden, left the rest blank” Ken Webster, Jr., for the Michael Berry Show, KTRH Radio, includes a Fox video clip of Sidney Powell listing charges. 

·         “Official Says Optimism Growing That Trump Wins Arizona,” by Bowen Xiao for The Epoch Times, Nov. 10 (updated Nov. 11), 2020 

·         “County received mail-in ballot from Nevada woman who died in 2017; state investigating 2 allegations” by David Charns for 8NewsNow Las Vegas, 

·          “Sorry, Nancy, House Democrats Had Another BAD Day in the Races That Have Yet to Be Called” by Matt Vespa for Townhall, Nov. 11, 2020. 

·         “Arizona Congresswoman Says Trump Should Not Concede” by Bowen Xiao for The Epoch Times, Nov. 12, 2020. 

·         “Rudy Giuliani Confirms “Dominion”Whistleblowers Are Coming Forward (Video)” News BBT, Nov. 11, 2020. 

·         Kyle Becker Twitter thread, with video, claiming Dominion machinery has the ability to add marks to a ballot after the voter last touches it. Every county that used it may need to be recounted by hand.