What is truth? Is it real? Or is it relative—whatever each
different person perceives it to be?
I’m a believer that there is a truth; it exists outside of ourselves. Our
perceptions of it may be different, but if we are seekers of truth, we question
our perceptions, and look for what is real.
sketch of a Grecian Urn, by John Keats, who wrote the poem "Ode on a Grecian Urn," which makes the claim "Beauty is truth, truth beauty" image from Wikipedia |
There is a contingent of modern thinkers who claim that
truth is relative. You can have your truth; I can have mine. We must accept
that what may be true for you, might not be true for your neighbor.
This sounds open-minded and tolerant. But there are problems
that come up when you can’t agree on “what is
is.” How do we live together with irreconcilable differences on certain things?
For example, if I believe I own a piece of property, and you
come along and decide you own that same piece of property, who gets to enjoy
the benefits of property ownership? In the non-philosophical world, where we
have laws to settle just such disagreements, it would be the person with the
deed to the property. The deed is a proof, or evidence of a truth: right of
ownership.
Suppose you believe that marriage is a certain thing—a permanent
contract between a man and a woman, obligating them to one another, forming a
permanent family in which to bring up their offspring, and to financially and socially
sustain one another. Suppose someone else believes marriage is any two people
announcing they are in a sexual relationship for the time being. Those are not
the same things. It is possible for two people to define a word differently, but
the thing they define can’t be the two incompatible different things at the
same time.
Can the two people hold these different views at the same
time and go their separate ways? That was what the Supreme Court ruling in 2015
claimed they could do. But they have not been allowed to. Believers in the
permanent-contract-between-a-man-and-a-woman have been told they must accept
the any-two-people-in-a-current-relationship as equivalent, even when theirs is
a deeply held religious belief. And thus we have bakers, florists, and
photographers being coerced to use their artistic skills for purposes that, to
them, deny truth.
Suppose you believe that male and female are the only
two sexes for human beings, and that your DNA and physiology define which one
you are. This has been the truth for all of the millennia of human history. But
there are others in our time who believe that there is a plethora of sexes for
human beings, and that a person is whatever the individual decides to be,
regardless of physiology.
Can the two different people hold these different views at
the same time and let the other live their own way? In a tolerant world that
could happen. But there is a huge amount of pressure right now to enforce a
belief that doesn’t coincide with reality, science, truth as we have historically
known it, or as nearly all of us can perceive it to be.
We’re seeing this enforcement of “my relative truth is the
one you have to believe” play out with the militantly dogmatic LGBT community
(add letters at will to LGBT). But it also exists in politics, economics,
academia, entertainment, and just about everywhere you look.
It isn’t actually true that the earth would be better off
without humans on it, and that we ought to return to pre-industrial-age
technology to atone for being here. Nor is it true that you love pollution if
you don’t buy into that humans-are-evil perception.
It isn’t actually true that setting a higher minimum wage
for low-skilled workers will make the lives of enter-level workers better. It
is more likely to prevent entry-level workers from getting the first jobs that
give them experience along with a little bit of income.
It isn’t actually true that government intervention shows
that government cares. Government can’t actually care at all; it is simply power. What is actually true is that
government interference causes unintended consequences, usually exactly the
opposite of the stated goal of the interference. By the way, it isn’t true that
government-require purchased health insurance means better health care for all;
in the real world it means higher costs and lower quality health care for all.
It isn’t actually true that abstract art, or pushing the
envelope, leads to more beauty. Art within constraints has always led to more
beauty and innovation than meaningless shapes or purposely vile depictions.
It isn’t actually true that Democrats are the good guys to
minorities, especially Blacks. In the provable reality, Democrats have historically been anti-Black, and their policies have proven harmful to Blacks
more so other demographics. But perception has overridden verifiable reality
for over 90% of Black voters.
It isn’t actually true that centrally standardized
government institutional education means better education; in the real world
this often means education is deficient for all but the few whose needs match
up with the factory-style approach. Maybe not even for them. But even bringing
up the idea of alternative choices leads to a howling about not caring about
children.
Here’s the problem I see with the philosophical belief that
truth is relative: those who claim to believe this are the least likely to
tolerate differences from their view of truth. If truth is relative, then the
rule must be that you cannot impose your truth on someone else. So there should
be zero pressure on the population to conform to their alternative, personal “truths.”
In a world where reality, like gravity, is not to be
ignored, we are better off doing certain things:
·
Be open to new information, in case your
perception of what is true isn’t accurate.
·
Be tolerant of others who have different
beliefs; give the benefit of the doubt that they are searching for truth just
as you are. You might just be at a different place in the truth search journey right
now.
·
But when you have enough data to be quite sure
of a truth, and the other side has no convincing evidence on their side, don’t
let them bully you into submission. Stand firm even when the pressure is huge,
and growing, and intimidating. Maybe especially then.
Maybe this is why Captain America is my favorite Marvel superhero. image from here |
No comments:
Post a Comment