Leeper Day has nothing to do with Leap Year Day. It’s the
day the Texas Supreme Court gave the final word declaring homeschools to be
private schools, and therefore legal, in Texas. Which led to much of our homeschool
freedom across the country.
Where to start the story? Let’s briefly go back to 1915. At that
point, the state legislature enacted compulsory attendance laws, which included
either public schools or private schools. At that time, a majority of Texas
students were educated in small, unaccredited private schools or at home. Only
10% attended public schools.
Move ahead a few decades, and public schools have overtaken
private schools as the common experience. But all along there continued to be
people who educated their children at home.
The more public schools monopolized education—along with
more one-size-must-fit-all rules and regulations—more parents looked for
alternatives. There have always been parochial and private schools. But for
families with multiple children—who are already paying ever increasing taxes
for education—the tuition can be daunting.
And then there are these reasons: lack of religious and
moral education in public schools, bad socialization in public schools, lack of
individualized attention for different learners running the gamut from Down’s
Syndrome, to learning disorders, through gifted students. Plus there are other
reasons—families wanting to spend more time together, families wanting to
travel together, families with students specializing in various talents and
skills.
So, in the 1970s and 1980s, there were families who
homeschooled—but they were seen as iconoclastic pioneers in an era of
factory-modeled public schools. These pioneers were mainly dedicated,
hardworking families who valued education and were willing to sacrifice to give
their children what they thought was best. But public school officials saw them
as a threat and began prosecuting them for truancy. Starting in 1981 the Texas
Education Association (TEA) changed its language to declare that home educated
students were not exempt from compulsory attendance at public schools.
Daughter Social Sphere, ctitizen lobbying at the state capitol, one of our homeschool adventures |
The courts were mixed in their decisions: sometimes school
districts won, sometimes homeschooling families.
Families started working together and learning how to lobby
the legislature in hopes that writing clarifying laws, guaranteeing parental
rights, might help. And they got better at that—but the legislative route, in a
state that was at that time staunchly democrat with the big government that
goes with that, was not making progress. [Homeschoolers are still among the
best citizen lobbyists in Texas, forever working to restore and maintain
parental rights. Because, as they say, “When the legislature is in session, no
one’s freedoms are safe.”]
Shelby Sharpe, attorney in the Leeper v. Arlington case photo from THSC.org |
Then, in March 1985, a lawyer named Shelby Sharpe decided to
go about things in a different way. He filed a lawsuit on behalf of all home
educators in Texas, at the request of a number of homeschool families and
curriculum suppliers, against all the school districts in Texas. The Leeper
family became the title of the case, against their school district, Arlington
ISD (independent school district). The lawsuit asked for a declaratory judgment
on whether or not the legislature had intended the term “private schools” to
include homeschools, back in that 1915 statute on compulsory education.
This case turned things around, from defense to offense.
Instead of individual families one-by-one defending their right to homeschool,
homeschooling families together charged 1063 individual public school districts
to prove that homeschoolers hadn’t been following the law all along.
Besides the lawyer, who was extraordinary during the years
this case went through the courts, there were some other figures who stand out.
One is expert witness Dr. R. J. Rushdoony, who knew Texas law, and testified in
homeschooling cases across the country. The opposition couldn’t refute the
facts he brought with him.
Additionally, there were the families that were represented
in the case, the Leeper family and others. The opposition had tried to portray
homeschooling families in various negative ways. They claimed they were
bigoted, and they pulled their kids out of school after integration because
they didn’t want to mix—but the families were a broad mix, including black and
Hispanic families, who were as welcome in homeschool communities and anyone
else.
The opposition claimed they were just using their older
children to babysit younger children while they went to work—but they were
never able to find even a single such family anywhere in the state.
The opposition claimed that they weren’t educated well
enough to teach their own children. Even Teas Attorney General Jim Mattox
publicly made this claim. Here the opposition seriously failed to do its
homework. There was a particular family from near Houston, a black family. The
mother had worked at NASA. The opposition attorneys probably thought she had
been on the cleaning crew. But she was in fact an engineer—who had been offered
the opportunity to be the first woman, and the first black, astronaut; she had
turned down the opportunity for the sake of her family.
I re-watched a documentary on this homeschooling story—Taking a Stand in Texas: The Battle for Home
School Freedom, produced in 2007 for Texas Home School Coalition. In the
video, Shelby Sharpe tears up still, twenty years later, at the touching sacrifice
of this woman. I believe he mentioned her name, but I missed it. He had known
she was an engineer, but he hadn’t known she gave up being an astronaut; she
had been private about that. But her testimony convinced the judge that, a) she
was educated far beyond necessity for teaching her own children, b) the family
cared deeply about the children, and c) clearly racism had nothing to do with
it.
The video documentary by THSC,org (no longer available) |
In April 1987 Judge Charles J. Murray issued a decision in
Tarrant County District Court, binding on all the state’s school districts,
ruling that homeschools are private schools for the purpose of compulsory
attendance, completely validating the rights of parents to educate their
children at home anywhere in Texas.
While all the districts were involved, there were three main
school districts representing them in the case: Arlington, Katy (near Houston),
and another in, I believe, San Antonio. The superintendents in all three agreed
with the ruling and were willing to abide by the decision—no longer prosecuting
homeschoolers as truant. However, the State Board of Education (remember, this
is back when Texas was still mainly democrat) insisted on appealing.
The appeal took from September 4, 1987, to November 27,
1991, going through the same testimony. And the same decision. The Second
District Court of Appeals upheld the lower court’s ruling—completely, and
without changes.
The SBOE appealed again. Apparently believing that
homeschooling was some sort of threat to them. But finally, on June 9, 1994,
the Texas Supreme Court ruled unanimously (9-0) to confirm the lower court’s
decision.
As Sharpe describes it afterward, “After the victory that
God gave us in that case, the prosecutions [of homeschoolers] stopped in all
the other forty-nine states.”
Homeschoolers were taking a risk with the case. If they hadn’t
won, they had very little recourse.
But it is a God-given right for parents to see to the care
and upbringing of their children. That means it is not a right granted by
government when government sees fit; government interference is an attempt to
usurp authority from the parents.
So we have these pioneer homeschooling heroes to thank. By
the time our family started homeschooling in 2000, we were still a bit odd, but
everybody knew some homeschoolers. We were able to join with other homeschoolers
locally. We had resources at various levels to turn to. And curriculum
alternatives—including online resources, many of which are free or low cost—were already growing exponentially.
The homeschooling victory shows us a pattern. Individuals who valued education
had been seeing to the education of their children for centuries—millennia.
Government, whose purpose is to secure our rights of life, liberty, and
property, does the typical human thing and tries to usurp power, claiming it is
for the good of all. They skew a basic interest such as, “An educated populace
is necessary for a self-governing people,” into, “Government knows how best to
educate, and all people must submit.”
It’s scary how successful that tyrannical line has been for
well over a century so far. But people who say, “No, I have an inalienable right, and I
don’t submit to your control,” can eventually break through. And then everyone
benefits.
Not only are families free to homeschool if they choose, families
are gaining more and more alternatives to the government institutional
monopoly. Charter schools, private schools, education savings accounts, part-time
private schools combined with homeschooling, private tutors, online programs,
special needs programs, specialized lessons—the variety is growing. The free
market is doing its inventive thing to meet the growing demand.
So, even though we face tyranny from so many directions
around us—marriage laws, sexual-predator-accessible bathroom and locker room
facilities, religious discrimination, speech discrimination, and threats to so
many of our liberties—we have seen an example of success against tyranny.
Thank you, homeschooling pioneers, for teaching us that we
can win back our freedom.
No comments:
Post a Comment