I trust there are still enough people with a desire for
self-reservation, that this won’t become widespread here. [Although the tiny
conspiracy-theory side of me glanced at the idea that spreading ebola in Texas
was a pretty efficient way to take down the strongest economy in the nation, by
someone who’s resentful of it.] What I’d like to look at is the proper role of
government, in this context.
Saturday, October 4, Houston Chronicle front page story |
Conservatives aren’t, as maligned, against all government.
We are for limited government with enumerated purposes. (Read my posts Role of Government and Proper Role of Government--Again.)
So, what does the Constitution say about Ebola? Nothing
specifically. But generally, we can assume that a widespread death threat to
Americans is something we have this federal government for: common defence (defense for the whole
United States), general Welfare (pertaining
to the well-being of all Americans at the same time), and securing the Blessings of Liberty, which are defined
in the Declaration of Independence as “life, liberty, and the pursuit of
happiness,” (the third of which is a more general way of saying “property”
without limiting that to real estate property, and expands it also to what has
not yet been acquired but is being worked for).
Key here is life.
We retain, as individuals, the right to protect our own
lives. Our states also retain the right and responsibility to protect people
within the state. The federal government has the responsibility to protect from
dangers between and among states (example: a murderer who flees from one state
to another), and to protect from dangers threatening to come across our
borders.
Ebola is such a threat. Until a month ago, there had never
been anyone sick with this hemorrhagic fever virus inside our borders. We have
the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, which is meant, quite rightly,
to offer common defense. It has a mission to protect public health and safety
through the control and prevention of disease, injury, and disability. Part of
this is the Communicable Disease Center (CDC), which has been around since
1946, when it was part of an effort to overcome malaria. (It was renamed in
1970 as the Center for Disease Control, still CDC for short.)
In our day, ebola has been a rare but important target of
the CDC. It did research, and without a cure so far, has informed infected
parts of the world on prevention and containment. In short, African villages
with outbreaks have been quarantined until the disease ran its course.
Sometimes with everyone in the village dying—but at least not spreading beyond.
For unknown reasons (unknown to me), the outbreak that began February 2014
was not contained as previous outbreaks. The places where it has broken out
face some major challenges without First World help. They may not have running
water, hospital isolation units, hazmat gear, or other basics of containment.
It could be argued that we are not responsible for stepping in and controlling
the disease in other countries. But if we don’t, the other option is to
quarantine those places from the rest of the world—as a matter of life and
death.
The outbreak has grown in Africa. And this summer, among
those health workers trying to contain it were two Americans. They were given
an experimental vaccine (untried on humans, and very limited prototype quantity,
since used on others without success). Both were returned to the US, in
contained air travel and placed into contained hospital quarters. So we were
assured there was no chance of it getting out. I am glad they recovered; they
were worth trying to save, since their efforts had been to bravely fight the
outbreak in the first place. Nevertheless, they became the first cases of ebola
ever on US soil. (News today was that the man is back in the hospital, but they think the new infection is unrelated.)
Still, the current head of the CDC, Thomas Frieden, assured
that an outbreak in the US was extremely unlikely. Just days before the first
loose cannon case arrived. A Liberian man, Thomas Eric Duncan, who knew he had
been exposed to ebola, suddenly quit his job as a UPS driver and flew to Texas,
it is now assumed to give himself the best chance of receiving successful
treatment. He lied in Liberia to get his travel visa; Liberia says, if he
survives, he is subject to prosecution, which will make him a refugee who
cannot return to his home country. But that does nothing to discourage others
from following his path.
He went to the hospital when he began showing symptoms. He
mentioned that he had recently arrived from Liberia. It was in the nurse’s
notes, but for some reason those weren’t easily visible to the doctor who
looked at his information on the computer system. It appears he did not admit
to exposure to ebola during that hospital visit. He was sent home with an
antibiotic. Two days later, after having spread bodily fluids around the
apartment he was staying in, and on the sidewalk, and in the ambulance, and in
the hospital—he began to be treated for ebola. He continues at this writing in
critical condition. We are told the disease kills from 50%-90% of victims. Today
it was announced he was being given yet another experimental anti-viral drug,
no results yet.
We can assume, somewhat safely, that the hospital has taken
adequate precautions to protect personnel and patients. However, there’s the
rest of the circle of his influence. Supposedly he couldn’t spread the disease
until he started showing symptoms. But we know that was at least two days
before his ultimate hospitalization. In that time, he was in his apartment, his
girlsfriend’s family’s apartment, came into contact with her and anyone else
who may have lived or visited there.
Eventually the apartment and whoever had been there were
moved out and quarantined (where they must remain for up to three weeks,
assuming symptoms do not appear). A hazmat team cleaned out the Dallas apartment.
Done.
Not quite. The list of people who may have come in contact
with Duncan is now at 50—that we know of, with 10 considered at high risk of
contracting the disease because of close contact. Again, that we know of.
Dallas County Judge Clay Jenkins, Breitbart News reported, went
into the apartment the day before the hazmat team cleaned it out, several
times, transported some of the quarantined people a 45-minute drive, and then
went home to his family. We don’t know that he touched any of the infected
matter inside the apartment, but he was in the apartment where such matter
existed, and he was in contact with people who had been in contact with such
matter. Jenkins is not under quarantine for the next three weeks. Nor are the
members of his family—including at least one school child.
Meanwhile, news announcements of additional cases of ebola in the US show up--at five as of this writing.
I remember, with some chagrin, the last day of son Political
Sphere’s second grade year. A next-door neighbor had chicken pox, so we had an
expectation that, probably within a couple of weeks, he would get chicken pox
too. But he wanted to attend the festivities on the last day of school. So I
checked him carefully before sending him off on the bus. He had no symptoms: no
fever, no headache, and most importantly no little red dots.
When he came home, he was itching. And the spots were there.
And he had just exposed the entire second-grade class. Oops! We were
self-quarantined for much of the summer. There were the weeks Political Sphere
was sick, joined by son Economic Sphere a couple of weeks later—even worse. And
three-month-old Social Sphere also got them, but fortunately only a mild case,
at an age when she was too little to scratch them. She got off easy.
The next-door neighbors all got it; that’s where we’d gotten
it from. So the kids got to play together once they felt well enough. I don’t
know what happened with the rest of the second grade. My intentions had been
good. I thought I had been diligent enough. Most importantly, no death threat
was involved. Later in our public school experience, notice was given of a
child undergoing cancer treatment, who was dangerously susceptible to chicken
pox, but this was not the case when our kids contracted it. There is also now a
vaccine. But, back then we just did the best we could to protect ourselves.
I don’t know whether the CDC has done enough to protect us.
Today they're saying a "major outbreak" in the US is highly unlikely; but after their last prediction, it's hard to trust their assurances.
The federal government has a number of specific tasks it has refused to do.
First, no one should be allowed into the country coming from an outbreak
country—unless they have gone through a three-week quarantine to guarantee
their safety. This should preferably take place before getting on a plane. Next
best, and possibly in addition, would be undergoing quarantine upon arrival, before being allowed to move
about the country.
This isn’t an extreme or unusual measure. When relatives
moved to Singapore, some decades ago, their dog underwent a month-long
quarantine before being allowed to rejoin the family. Missionaries going to
various places around the world must get a list of vaccines first. Mr.
Spherical Model had to update certain vaccinations before being able to travel
to Angola a year ago.
Ebola has no vaccine yet. Prevention and containment are
essential. Prevention and containment are included in the proper role of government. But our president will not
prevent flights in from infected places—because that would be rude?
If someone comes to your door and says, “Help me! I think I
have ebola,” and then throws up on your porch, do you invite them in, expose
your family, and then call 911? No. You close the door, and then make the
phonecall. And arrange for decontamination of your porch. No one would think
you were rude for closing the door. Rudeness, when the life of your family is
at stake, is the least of your concerns.
So what is going on here? Some speculation is that it has to
do with the president’s open border agenda. He can’t close the border to
possible ebola victims without admitting harmful elements can come in through
our open borders. And he has an agenda for opening the borders and offering
amnesty—and eventual citizenship, preferably tied to voting for his party.
Is it possible that his “open border” policy can take
precedence over the life of Americans? Only if the person(s) with that agenda
believe he can “think” reality into something he wants it to be, regardless of
evidence. Picture a child, plugging his ears, saying, “la la la I can’t hear
you.”
But the president isn’t doing nothing. He is deploying our military. He is sending around 4000
trained killers to… To what? I’m uncertain. One could picture them being placed
around infected villages and shooting anyone who tries to break quarantine. But
I don’t think that is the purpose to which they are being put.
One could, with a stretch, picture them building temporary
hospital containment facilities. Why trained military would be used for this
purpose, I don’t know. But they have some experience putting up and taking down
temporary courtroom facilities at Guantanamo, for example. There are among them
those trained to build bridges over which heavy trucks or tanks can travel.
(The military may also have skills in blowing up such bridges to prevent
enemies from transporting their materiel.)
I don’t know what it is these thousands of our soldiers are
being tasked to do. There are many scenarios in which the president might place
our military in harm’s way for a security purpose. Securing an ebola outbreak
can be construed as a worthwhile mission. But it doesn’t appear, without
explanation, to be an appropriate use of our military. And it does appear to be
an unnecessary risk to their lives—and to the lives of anyone they may come in
contact with during and after.
I cannot read the mind of our president, or his
administration. But it is very difficult to trust someone who prioritizes keep
our borders open—even if it means letting in a possible pandemic—so we don’t
look rude.
I hope there are enough real workers—scientists, health
workers, security personnel—state and local in the absence of federal—who will
overcome the president’s blindness and return us to some health safety.
No comments:
Post a Comment