By way of
review, among other sources, I’ve been looking at endorsements from several
sources. CCHC is the Conservative
Coalition of Harris County, and is a self-funded grassroots group, including several
people I know personally; they try hard to get to know the candidates and share
what they find. They do a silent ballot, and offer the percentage of the vote;
70% or more means endorsement. TFR
stands for Texans for Fiscal Responsibility, which gives scrutiny to taxes and
other fiscal issues. TCR stands for
Texas Conservative Review, and HRBC
stands for Houston Realty Business Coalition. These both claim conservative
credentials. I vary in how much I agree with them, but they give me additional
data. I also have personal resources: DA
stands for a couple of friends in the DA’s office who share their inside opinions
on judicial races with friends who ask. PC
is a neighboring precinct chair with quite a lot of experience, so I add her
endorsements to the data.
Texas is set
up with a two-part Supreme Court, consisting of the Supreme Court, which
handles mainly civil cases, and the Criminal Court of Appeals, which is the “supreme
court” for criminal cases.
going through the avalanche of info |
In Harris
County (which includes the Greater Houston Area), the courts are divided into
district courts, with numbers based on whatever number came up when the
division was made. Different courts typically have a specific assignment, like
criminal courts, or family courts.
Usually when
there’s a primary challenger, it’s because there’s an open seat: a judge has
retired or been appointed to another court. Candidates don’t necessarily know
who their challengers are prior to signing up to run. So sometimes we find a
number of really good people in one race. We’ll eventually get to a couple of
those.
Chief Justice, Texas Supreme Court:
I am
struggling to make a decision here. Nathan Hecht is the incumbent, recently
appointed by Governor Perry. He has been a justice on the court since 1988. Among
my sources, DA, TFR, and HRBC support Hecht. His opponent is Robert Talton, whom
I became aware of during his tenure as a Texas representative. He was a brave
standard-bearer of conservative causes. He left the Texas House to run for US
House, a race he didn’t win. Because I recognized his name, my first reaction
was to lean toward him. He also gets 60% support from CCHC, as well as support
from TCR and PC. However, there ought to be a good reason to take out an
incumbent. Last time around, David Medina had come to our Tea Party and talked
about his position on the Supreme Court. He had been appointed by the governor
as well. I liked him. I thought he was the better candidate, from what I could
find. But he lost—because he’d been appointed rather than elected to the
position. While I don’t think appointments just need to be rubber stamped, I
think judges need to be taken on their actual merits. I can’t find a
significant reason for removing Hecht, who has served well as an elected
Supreme Court Justice for so long. So I am inclined, right now, to vote for Nathan Hecht.
Supreme Court Justice, Place 6:
The two
choices are Joe Pool and Jeff Brown.
CCHC gives Brown 100% support. He also gets support from all of my other
sources. No one gives anything positive about Pool. I can’t add any additional
knowledge to this race. So I’m voting for Jeff Brown.
Supreme Court Justice, Place 8:
Phil Johnson
gets 100% support from CCHC, plus support from TFR, HRBC, DA, and BC. Only TCR
supports Sharon McCally. I am inclined to go with Phil Johnson.
Court of Criminal Appeals 3:
Bert Richardson
gets 85% support from CCHC, plus DA, TCR, and HRBC support. PC supports Barbara
Walther. I haven’t met either one, but I think I’ll go with Bert Richardson.
Court of Criminal Appeals 4:
This is an
open seat with three people running: Richard Dean Davis, Kevin Patrick Yeary,
and Jani Jo Wood. All of my sources support Yeary, with CCHC giving him 100%
support. Incidentally, the Houston Chronicle thinks Yeary is a nice guy but
prefers Wood. I don’t know what criteria they use, but I seldom agree with
them, so an endorsement might be a point against. I think I’ll vote for Kevin Yeary.
Court of Criminal Appeals 9:
David Newell
and W. C. “Bud” Kirkendall are running for this position. I met David Newell at
a judicial candidate forum recently and found him quite impressive. I haven’t
met his opponent. David Newell gets 90% support from CCHC, plus support from
DA, HRBC, and TCR. PC goes for Kirkendall. I think I’ll go with my personal
opinion and go for David Newell.
That
finishes the statewide races. Now we’ll go to more local/regional.
State Senate District 7:
This
position opened up when Dan Patrick decided to run for Lieutenant Governor.
Paul Bettencourt and James Wilson are running for the position. Paul
Bettencourt, former Harris County Tax Assessor, was nicknamed the Tax Man, and
was known for going out of his way to inform people on how to get their property
assessments lowered. Locally, we’ve liked him a long time, and he has name
recognition. James Wilson used to work with the legendary Phil Gramm. He seems
like a nice guy. But he doesn’t have the fire to overcome Bettencourt’s name. I
hope he’ll do some other good work in the future. But I’m voting for Paul Bettencourt—who also got 100%
support from CCHC, plus HRBC, PC, and TCR.
State Representative District 150:
I’m not in
this district, and wouldn’t comment, except that I want to give a good word for
Representative Debbie Riddle, who
has been a treasure.
It’s hard to overstate how
hard-working she has been, and responsive to the very issues important to us
grassroots conservatives. Her opponent, Tony Noun, was scheduled to speak at a
recent Tea Party meeting and didn’t show. I can’t figure out why he’s running.
State Representative District 132:
I’m not in
this district either, but it’s close to mine. I have a lot of friends in this
district. It’s an open seat, because of the retirement of Bill Callegari. Of
the four candidates, I think I like Michael Franks best, a lawyer, very logical
and well spoken. However, I think the leading candidates are Justin Perryman and Mike
Schofield. People feel strongly positive about both; Schofield is new to the
district, but has been active nearby for a long time. Perryman has a resume that
looks like a character on NCIS—varied and talented, with some military, some
business, some out-of-country experience. There may be some family challenges
going on there, however. All I can say is, good luck deciding.
County Treasurer:
The
incumbent is Orlando Sanchez. He has
been quietly effective as a conservative in liberal-run Houston for many years.
I know very little about his opponent, Arnold Hinojosa. Sanchez gets the support
of all my sources (100% CCHC), and my support as well.
District Clerk:
Chris Daniel
came from among us in the grassroots. I think he was a law student his first
time as a state delegate, the same time I was. I think he’s done a good job as
District Clerk. I like his opponent, Court Koenning, who offers suggestions for
technological improvements. However, most of those improvements are already
underway, within the constraints of the actual budget, but making what looks to
me like real progress. So I’m going to stay with Chris Daniel. All of my sources agree (82% from CCHC), except PC,
who likes both and won’t endorse.
OK, we’ve
gotten through the statewide judicial races and most of the local non-judicial
races. But the interesting races, the ones, I’ve wanted to write about in order
to think through them fully, are still to come. There are some additional
county judicial races as well, but I need one more post to cover the 247th
Family Court, the 311th Family Court, and the Justice of the Peace
Precinct 4 Place 2 race. And after all those, I’ll render my decision about the
County Republican Chair. I don’t usually post on Saturdays (or Fridays either,
this year), but it’s a long ballot, and now is the time, if it’s going to be
useful to people getting ready to vote. So stay tuned for Part III.
I talked with my son Political Sphere this weekend, and he said he's glad I came to the conclusion that Nathan Hecht was the right choice for chief justice of the Texas Supreme Court. He has read actual briefs the justice has written, likes him a lot. And others do as well, sometimes referring to him as "the Scalia of the Texas Supreme Court." So, that's a strong endorsement.
ReplyDelete