We’ll take them individually.
Benghazi
You might be living under tyranny if your government scours
the internet to find an American citizen to serve as scapegoat, to cover up its
relationship with Islamist terrorists. We covered this in more detail Monday,
specifically about that search for a scapegoat and the continued lying about it—with
the hint that the purpose must be to cover up something much worse, which we
don’t know about yet. I did link speculation by Glenn Beck from last October.
Here’s a second, shorter clip (5th one down in this collection) from that same week in October 2012. In addition,
Geraldo Rivera let slip that his sources currently corroborate what Beck has
been saying (to the sound of crickets) for half a year.
I don’t know what Benghazi was really about. I do know that
the tyrannists we are currently subject to went to great lengths to lie about
what they were doing, about what happened, and why. They use obfuscation,
repeated lies, and eventually claim, “That happened so long ago; what
difference does it make now?”—a pattern we can count on. And there’s not much
from these tyrants that one can count on.
IRS Thuggery
You might be living under tyranny if the most powerful
collection agency in the world creates an enemies list—and if you love your
country, you’re on it.
I’ve been aware of the IRS enemies list for some time. I
couldn’t locate the date in my notes, but it seems like within the last year
that King Street Patriots let us know, at one of the Monday meetings, what was
happening to them, which sounds very much like other stories this week. (King
Street Patriots was mentioned on Rush Limbaugh’s Tuesday show; they’re
definitely on this list of targets.) The amount of information required by the
IRS was impossible to obtain, and ridiculously short-time-limited. They were
getting the help of lawyers to help with the effort, in addition to the various
other lawsuits they suffer pretty continually.
King Street and other groups were given impossible
requirements, including having to provide copies of every email, text, tweet,
or post given out or received, since inception of the organization; list of
speakers, detailed subjects (including transcripts of what was spoken in some cases, as if anyone hoping to become
qualified for tax exempt status already has transcribing technology at the
ready), and lists of participants, and in some cases the affiliations of family
members of participants. It was horrendously intrusive, impossible to provide,
and intended (I believe, as do many others) to intimidate and extinguish voices
at odds with this administration.
What we know is that high level officials in the IRS, which is the collection arm of the executive
branch (the Obama administration), sent the directive to flag for extra
scrutiny any organization applying for tax exempt status if they had certain
characteristics: the words tea party, patriot, or had as a purpose educating
about the Constitution, or showing disagreement with the current government.
Hmmm.
And that is not all.
Oh, no, that is not all. Besides harassment based on patriotism and good
citizenship, the IRS also provided the application materials—private documents—to
enemy organizations.
The president is shocked, SHOCKED! After leadership in his
executive branch has come out and apologized (claiming it was rogue underlings,
which they’ve since had to walk back), so the actual deed is known and admitted
to, the president says, if the allegations turn out to be true, that would be
outrageous. But let’s be cautious and not assume they’re true just because the
executive branch has already come out and said so (possibly to do damage
control for what would be worse revelations if they waited?)
And Jim Carney, his spokesperson, also claimed the president was unaware and
therefore guilt-free. But he was certain, if it turns out to be true, the president
will be appropriately outraged. So the president, while cautiously not outraged
yet, is preparing to be so if the need arises. And then appropriate action will
be taken. Rest assured. (For some reason, I’m not resting well on that
assurance.)
If you think targeting political enemies is unconscionable,
if might not be comforting to learn your political enemies have a totally
different moral take on it: Former NAACP chair, for example.
Media Control
You might be living under tyranny if the government has an unusual
number of incestuous relationships with members of the media, but feels the
need to place secret wiretaps on wide swaths of major media organizations, in
case something is said they don’t like.
These relationships were pointed out as reasons the mediahas hesitated to cover Benghazi:
·
CNN president is married to Hillary Clinton’s deputy
secretary.
·
CBS president is the brother of Obama adviser on
Benghazi.
·
ABC president is the brother of a top Obama
adviser/speech writer.
·
Senior ABC correspondent Claire Shipman is
married to WH Press Secretary Jay Carney. (She also happens to substitute
anchor on Good Morning America and World News Tonight, and shows up on ABC News’
This Week with Christiane Amanpour, and previous worked as a White House
correspondent for NBC News.)
But the administration didn’t think it had enough control,
so it claimed, supposedly, that in order to find a leak of some possibly
classified information (you know, like the New
York Times used to print regularly to endanger our troops during the Bush
administration), they needed all correspondence for two months of some 20 AP
reporters and editors, not just anyone related to actually leaked material, and
not just office phones, but private cell phones, emails, texts—you know, just
in case.
Carl Bernstein, who helped take down Nixon, wasn’t moved by
Benghazi, or the IRS scandal. But this! This is outrageous!
National Journal’s
Ron Fournier, once the AP Washington bureau chief, finally sees the situation with clarity, not that it has hit home:
One common thing with Benghazi and the
IRS scandal, is were being misled every day. We were lied to on Benghazi, on
the talking points behind Benghazi, for months. We were lied to by the IRS for
months. And now they’re sending a clear message to our sources: Don’t embarrass
the administration, or we’re coming after you.
The president’s response is, “Don’t ask
me; that’s up to the Department of Justice” (which is particularly ill-named
right now).
The list isn’t complete. Scandals are
coming fast and furious (yes, pun intended). The question is, now that we know
we’re living under tyranny, is recognition the first step toward changing
course? Will the tyrants be held accountable? We’ll see.
I came across this list of 100 reasons
the president could be impeached. I haven’t been through them all, but you
might want to take a look for yourself anyway. Personally, I don’t see
impeachment as a likely outcome.
I’m thinking of The Princess Bride, near the end, where Westley decides to leave
Prince Humperdinck intact but alone his cowardice (instead of wallowing in freakish misery
as previously threatened). Self-disgust with no more power over the people—that
would be a just end to the long list of injustices perpetrated against a
Constitutionally free people.
No comments:
Post a Comment