I got this Norman Rockwell painting on a magnet as a reminder of the day I got to pin the Eagle badge on my son. |
This isn’t going to be pretty. It involves talking math, and
unfortunately also discussion of pedophilia. My apologies. There are also footnotes worth following. (If you look up the references, some of them will lead to additional references, which I do not list.)
The number of children who undergo molestation is not
precisely known, but can be estimated, as has been done in a number of studies.
Logic tells us there are four combinations possible: male molester/female child
victim; female molester/female child victim; male molester/male child victim;
female molester/male child victim. For our question about the Boy Scouts, we
can delete female victims for both male and female predators, simply because
girls don’t belong to the Boy Scouts.[i]
Homosexuals make up about 1.5% of the population, according
to careful research. Frequently this number is cited as 3%. The homosexual community
often makes the unsupported claim that they make up 10% of the population. Some
of the data I’m about to present uses the generous percentage of 2%. So, using
that compromise, we can logically assume that heterosexual molestation comes
from the 98% of heterosexual population. Same-sex molestation, therefore, comes from 2% of the
population.
About 17% of young men in America are sexually abused before
adulthood. Only a small percentage of these are female molester/male victim
cases. For comparison, some estimates are that one in four girls (25%) will be
molested (which goes up to one in three for females during their lifetime), the
vast majority are male molester/female victim cases—in other words, coming from
the 98% heterosexual population. The male abuser/male victim cases, then, come
from the 2% of the population that are homosexual.
Note that the data does not imply that all homosexuals are
predators; that is certainly not the case. However, the risk of someone in that
demographic being a predator is much much higher than in the population at
large. And at this point we don’t have a way for a “safe” homosexual to certify
that they are one of the harmless ones.
Here are a couple of summaries from those who have done the
math. This first one is from Steve Baldwin in “Child Molestation and the
Homosexual Movement”[ii] :
Family Research Institute founder and psychologist Paul Cameron,
reviewing more than nineteen different academic reports and peer reviewed
studies in a 1985 Psychological Reports
article, found that homosexuals account for between 25% and 40% of all child
molestation. Sex researhers Freund, Heasman, Racansky, and Glancy, for example,
in a 1984 Journal of Sex and Marital
Therapy article, put the number at 36%. Erickson, Walbek, Sely, in a 1988 Archives
of Sexual Behavior article, places it at 86% when the children being
molested are male.
However, it should be noted that homosexuals account for only
2% of the population which statistically means that a child molester is ten to
twenty times more likely to be homosexual than heterosexual. In other words,
heterosexual molestations proportionally are a fraction compared to homosexual
molestations. More recent studies confirm this statistic. In 2000, the Archives
of Sexual Behavior published an article by seven sex researchers concluding
that ‘‘around 25-40% of men attracted to children prefer boys. Thus the rate of
homosexual attraction is 6-20 times higher among pedophiles."
There are additional versions of the research. One study by
homosexual activists and researchers revealed that 73% of homosexuals surveyed
had sex with boys sixteen to nineteen years of age or younger.[iii]
Additional studies compare female and male targets as well as homosexual vs.
heterosexual predators, such as this one: “Child molestation, by comparison,
was a relatively infrequent crime occurring from an average of 23.2 times by a
pedophile (nonincest) with female targets to an average of 281.7 times by a
pedophile (nonincest) whose targets were males.”[iv]
Baldwin makes specific references to pedophilia infiltration
within the Boy Scouts:
When a California family sued the Scouts in 1993 for exposing
their son to a Scout leader who molested him, the Scouts were ordered to turn over
25,000 pages of documents to the plaintiff.
This unprecedented glimpse into the world of Scout pedophiles revealed
that thousands of boys had been molested by Scout leaders and other volunteers
between 1971 and 1991 resulting in the expulsion of over 1,800 Scout volunteers
for pedophile activity. The documents show that some Scout leaders molested
over forty boys before getting caught, and that many, once caught, simply moved
to a different Scout troop and continued abusing boys.
Gay activists have spun the Scout molestation epidemic as a
heterosexual problem. Examination of many of the higher profile cases, however,
reveals that Scout molesters are attracted exclusively to boys and many lead
mainstream gay lifestyles. John Hemstreet is a typical example. Hemstreet is a
convicted child molester, former Boy Scout leader, and currently the President
of the Toledo, Ohio, chapter of Parents and Friends of Lesbians and Gays
(PFLAG). PFLAG is one of the groups leading the nationwide attack on the Boy
Scouts of America.
Incredibly, the pro-pedophile group North American Man Boy
Love Association (NAMBLA), which calls itself a homosexual group, wrote a
letter to the national Scout office urging “the Boy Scouts of America to cease
its discrimination against openly gay or lesbian persons in the appointment of
its scout masters and its scouters and in its membership. This will permit
scouts to be exposed to a variety of life styles and will permit more of those
individuals who genuinely wish to serve boys to do so.”
NAMBLA used to make even other homosexual groups
uncomfortable. But in the last couple of decades they have been embraced as
part of the movement. You will find them represented at any gay parade or bookstore;
they have been mainstreamed. NAMBLA has actually published information
instructing pedophiles on how to become Boy Scout leaders, and other ways to
profile, lure, befriend, and rape a child, then avoid detection and prosecution.[v]
People who think the argument is about eliminating
discrimination against a harmless, helpful segment of the population are being
duped.
Boy Scouts of America (BSA) has responded by improving and increasing sexual molestation prevention training; I have been through it, more than once. Even volunteers at a Cub Scout day camp must have received the training and must abide by safety policies, such as two-deep leadership.
I know in Scout troops we have been involved in, sponsored by our church (and Latter-day Saints sponsor more troops in the US than any other sponsor), do not allow youth to be led by anyone of any sexual orientation that engages in sex outside of marriage. There is no discrimination against a segment of the population; there is discrimination against behaviors that do not qualify as moral to religious people. And the Boy Scouts is a tool for raising boys into moral men. It is not the only such tool, but it has been a good one.
I know in Scout troops we have been involved in, sponsored by our church (and Latter-day Saints sponsor more troops in the US than any other sponsor), do not allow youth to be led by anyone of any sexual orientation that engages in sex outside of marriage. There is no discrimination against a segment of the population; there is discrimination against behaviors that do not qualify as moral to religious people. And the Boy Scouts is a tool for raising boys into moral men. It is not the only such tool, but it has been a good one.
If the Boy Scouts fail to remain true to their long stated mission, they will be less useful as a tool. If they stand strong, they may
lose funding because of the pressure from the homosexual community on donating
corporations. If the Boy Scouts give in, they may lose sponsorship by most of their
individual troop sponsors. (I can’t say for certain that will happen, or when,
but it does appear to me to be a likely eventuality.[vi])
What I can say for certain is that allowing homosexual
leadership will have two certain outcomes: First, teaching boys to be “morally
straight,” i.e., sexually pure, will be more difficult. Second, more boys will
be exposed to the risk of sexual predators. Resisting the pro-homosexual pressure is the only way for the the Boy Scouts to meet their mission for boys.
[i] In
some Explorer level troops, girls do participate. The number is so small
compared to the general population of the Boy Scouts that I do not include them
in the equation. Likewise, there are women leaders, in Cub Scouts as well as
some peripheral leadership positions in regular Scout troops, but not as Scout
Masters, and never as leadership during overnight activities without male
leadership present. So, while female predators cannot be 100% eliminated, they
are clearly not part of the question about allowing homosexual leaders.
[ii] See
Baldwin, Steve, “Child Molestation and the Homosexual Movement” and associated
notes: http://mail.famguardian.org/Subjects/SexualImmorality/Pedophilia/14_2baldwin.pdf
[iii] K.
Jay et al, The Gay Report: Lesbians and Gays Speak Out About Sexual
Experiences and Lifestyles 275 (1979).
[iv] Eugene
Abel et al., “Self-Reported Sex Crimes of Nonincarcerated Pedophiliacs, 2 Journal of Interpersonal Violence 3, 5
(1987). See also R. Blanchard et al, “Fraternal Order and Sexual Orientation in
Pedophiles,” 29 Archives Sexual Behav.
464 (2000); K. Freund & R I. Watson, “The Proportions of Heterosexual and
Homosexual Pedophiles Among Sex Offenders Against Children: An Exploratory Study,” 18 Journal of Sex & Marital Therapy 34,
34-43 (1992).
[v] Jeffery
Curley, age 10, was raped and murdered Oct. 1 1997. The perpetrators had in
their possession NAMBLA materials, as well as a book, “Rape and Escape,”
published by NAMBLA. They used an idea from the NAMBLA materials to lure the
boy. The family sued NAMBLA for its contribution to the murder of their son;
the ACLU defended NAMBLA pro bono, claiming NAMBLA has 1st amendment
rights to free speech; ironically, the ACLU requested a gag order against the
prosecution and asked for witnesses who testified in the Curley case concerning
the NAMBLA information to be disallowed.
No comments:
Post a Comment