First, let’s catalog a bit of the evidence (at this point
reported and under investigation but not publicly verified), to establish
reasons for this personal belief. That will fill the post for today (it could
fill up several, but I’m just touching the surface). Then we’ll take on the “remedy.”
As I said, the catalog of fraud is more than I can easily
cover here and still talk about the overall issue. But here are a few lists:
This piece from RedState is from a month before
the election, outlining the likely tactics based on holes in the system and
current and past practices. Turned out this was prescient. The list includes:
· The SOS Project (Secretaries of State were put
in place, by election or appointment, with George Soros approval, because they
are ultimately the vote counters).
· SEIU shenanigans (ACORN and Project Vote are
additional names; there are many).
· 11 million illegal immigrants.
· Fake ID industry, and inability of acting on
information of info mismatches.
· Voter Registration system flaws.
· Union GOTV strategies.
· Early Voting.
This collection, ObamaVoterFraud blog, was put
together in the few days following the election. With links for each included
in the piece, here are just a few of the many claims:
· 10 counties in Colorado report from 104% to 140%
voter turnout.
·
Philadelphia polling stations that kicked out
legal poll observers had 90% voter turnout and 99% of vote going to Obama.
(Overall turnout in Philadelphia was a realistic 60%.)
· 70,000 reports of observed fraud turned in by
end of Election Day.
· Voter fraud reported in Wisconsin.
·
Obama won dozens of Cleveland districts with
100% of the vote.
· Ohio residents show up at polls only to be told
they already voted (someone illegally voted in their name).
· Boston reports 129% voter turnout.
· Nevada unions are registering illegals and
forcing them to vote.
This piece from World Net Daily lists several additional evidences (20% of Ohio
registered voters are ineligible, for example) and concentrates on illegal
foreign donations as something to follow up on. But the author, Joseph Farah, a
former liberal radical himself, reveals some of the philosophy that leads our
enemy in power to justify their cheating, which I think is germane:
If anyone has a balanced approach to the realities of
political life in America, it’s me. I’ve looked at life from both sides. I know
the arguments of the other side and can still spout them before most of today’s
practitioners of so-called “progressive” thought can.
I also know that the reigning ethos of this movement
represented so ably today by Obama is this: “By any means necessary …” It was
first articulated by Jean Paul Sartre in his play, “Dirty Hands.” But it became
popularized as a slogan of the revolutionary left by Malcolm X.
What it means, in short, is that the ends justify the means.
It means violence is fine in achieving a worthwhile objective. It means lying,
stealing, cheating and all those other bourgeoisie “sins” are appropriate means
of furthering the cause.
Is there any doubt in your mind today that this is now the
reigning ethos of the Democratic Party and its various tentacles and allies?
There is no doubt in my mind.
And that’s why stealing the vote is not only an acceptable
practice by these people, it is a moral imperative in their twisted worldview.
This collection tries to summarize, as of a week after
Election Day, the litany of evidences. Additional reports I didn’t list above
include:
· Voting machines in several states reported “flipping”
ballots to Obama during early voting. While much of this was probably user
error, there was video evidence of the repeated problem in Pennsylvania, and
machines did indeed “flip” to a default Obama vote.
· In Cuyahoga County, Ohio, 50 precincts showed
Romney receiving 2 votes or less, and in 100 precincts, Obama received 99 or
more votes for every Romney vote.
· In Broward County, Florida, Obama received 99%
of the vote in many precincts.
· Wood County, Ohio, has a voting age population
of 98, 213 (not all necessarily eligible to register as voters), but on
Election Day they somehow had 106, 258 registered voters.
· In Wisconsin there were reports of people being
bussed in from Chicago to vote. The link for this unbelievable (anecdotal
Facebook) story is here,
and here’s an excerpt:
The Democrats stationed a self described “BIG Chicago pro
bono attorney” as one of their two observers at this small polling place. He
remained at the polling place from 7:00 a.m. until well after 8:p.m. …..A high
priced CHICAGO attorney, sitting in a Sheboygan WISCONSIN polling place,
observing wards comprised of 1500 voters? …. WHY???
Why would someone from Chicago be observing in Sheboygan
Wisconsin? And WHY at such a small polling place? Finally, isn’t it interesting
that this would occur at the VERY polling place in which all of the above
described events ALSO occurred? AGAIN WHY WOULD A CHICAGO ATTORNEY BE OBSERVING
AN ELECTION POLLING PLACE WITH FEWER THAN 1500 VOTERS IN IT, IN SHEBOYGAN
WISCONSIN? Of all the places where there has been suspected voting
irregularities, and OUTRIGHT FRAUD throughout the ENTIRE United States, WHY
HERE? WHY SHEBOYGAN? WHY THIS SMALL WARD?
This lawyer spent the day running in and out making, and
taking calls, which coincidentally then coincided with influxes of groups of
individuals by the van and bus loads, coming in to register, AND VOTE, using
what appeared to be copied Allient energy bills. These individuals often did
not have photo I.D.’s, could not remember their own addresses without looking
at the paper, and became easily tripped, confused and annoyed when questioned.
Many of these same individuals, just so happened to be
dressed in/wearing CHICAGO BEARS apparel, and whom openly discussed “catching
busses back to Chicago” with each other, with poll workers, via their cell
phones in the lobby area just outside the polling place, as well as in the
parking lot, both before and AFTER registering and voting.
One woman was dressed head to toe in CHICAGO BEARS apparel
including perfectly manicured BEARS fake fingernails!
She complained because registering was taking too long and
she had to hurry up to catch her bus back to Chicago.
We have photos of these people in vehicles with plates from
different states, photos of them leaving the polls, and other irregularities.
Let’s not forget about the military (as the federal
government apparently did), with military absentee ballots reportedly down by70%:
The conservative-leaning military vote has decreased
drastically since 2010 due to the so-called Military Voter Protection Act that
was enacted into law the year before. It has made it so difficult for overseas
military personnel to obtain absentee ballots that in Virginia and Ohio there
has been a 70% decrease in requests for ballots since 2008. In Virginia, almost
30,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots than in 2008. In Ohio,
more than 20,000 fewer overseas military voters requested ballots. This is
significant considering Obama won in both states by a little over 100,000
votes.
If you follow some of the links within the above lists, you’ll find Project Veritas
videos—James O’Keefe, who seems to never fail, even though they should see him
coming by now. Also, I left out reports of 140% voter turnout in Florida, as
reported early on. It turns out Florida is yet again incapable of voting and
counting votes as humanly expected. They had a two-page ballot; instead of
reporting how many ballots were reported, they reported how many pages, in
other words two pages per vote. When the 140% was cut in half, the turnout was
a more believable (but still high) 70%.
Remember 2000, when Democrats claimed Al Gore had been robbed
of the presidency—because attempts to cheat in Florida failed to put him over
the top in every count, so they just kept counting and changing the count—recounting
only counties that had already gone heavily in his favor but had not guaranteed
his win as expected? Remember the outrage of the left? Just imagine (actually
you can’t imagine, because it doesn’t happen) if conservatives were guilty of
so many evidences of fraud? The opposition would simply take to the streets and refuse to
accept the legitimacy of the presidency. In fact, even when Bush clearly won,
they spent eight years claiming he was a usurper (actually not using that word;
they don’t have the vocabulary).
Conservatives are genuinely upset. But I see no riots
forthcoming, nor would I favor such a response. Next post the question is,
Given massive voter fraud and an illegitimate presidency, what do
freedom-loving conservatives do in response?
No comments:
Post a Comment